=====================================================
Posted on 08/28/2014 4:59:07 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
.
August 28, 2014
Newt Gingrich : What Would Reagan Do?
=====================================================
Instead of criticizing President Barack Obama's lack of an effective national security policy as the terrorist threat of the Islamic State grows in Syria and Iraq, it might be helpful to imagine the speech President Ronald Reagan would have given in response to the videotaped beheading of James Foley.
There are many things a great power can do if it has leadership.
This fictional speech is an effort to describe a Reagan-like grand strategy, clarity of moral purpose and emphasis on effective actions. This is not a speech President Reagan could have delivered in the 1980s.
We set his speech at Naval Air Station Point Mugu, near the Reagan Ranch where he would be vacationing. This was also the site of his address to the nation after the Soviet Union shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007 in 1983 with a U.S. congressman aboard.
President Reagan entered office when the Soviet Union was the great threat. He saw Moscow as the center of evil in the world. He was determined to defeat and not merely contain the Soviet Union.
Through moral persuasion, a powerful military buildup, a grand anti-communist coalition, and an intense focus on a series of economic, diplomatic and psychological strategies, Reagan defeated the Soviet empire and it disappeared.
This was one of the most extraordinary grand strategic achievements in history. It took enormous discipline and focus.
In that era, terrorism was always a secondary or even tertiary issue. President Reagan sought to contain and minimize terrorism with minimum diversion of attention, energy and resources from the great campaign to defeat the Soviet empire.
So, this speech is designed to illustrate an alternate U.S. approach and strategy toward this threat if Reagan were president in today's very different world.
Text of Reagan address
My fellow Americans:
We have all been saddened and outraged by the vicious videotape of Islamic State terrorists beheading an American journalist. Our hearts go out to James Foley's family.
However, anger and sympathy are not solutions.
We, the American people, must come together in a righteous determination to defend freedom and civilization from barbarism, savagery and terrorism.
We must calmly, methodically and with the same grim determination we brought to winning World War II, implement strategies that eliminate the growing worldwide threat of radical Islamists prepared to kill us as individuals and our values as a civilization.
Some will suggest this exaggerates the threat from the Islamic State.
Let me remind them of some hard facts.
There are now an estimated 12,000 terrorists from over 50 countries in Islamic State-controlled parts of Iraq and Syria. Great Britain estimates more than 500 British citizens have joined the Islamic State. Our government estimates roughly 100 Americans are now engaged in enemy activities.
When we remember the death and destruction 19 terrorists achieved on 9/11, we have to take very seriously the threat from more than 12,000 terrorists.
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, has warned that the Islamic State "has an apocalyptic end of days strategic vision that will eventually have to be defeated."
He has expanded on the danger, saying their vision of a fundamentalist caliphate could "fundamentally alter the face of the Middle East and create a security environment that would certainly threaten us in many ways."
Furthermore, Gen. Dempsey has warned that the Islamic State cannot be defeated only in Iraq. He asserted, "Can they be defeated without addressing that part of the organization that resides in Syria? The answer is no."
In fact the very existence of terrorists from over 50 countries means that we must be thinking in terms of a global campaign to eradicate the virus of Islamic Extremism and the spirit of terrorism and barbarism that it is fostering. This is fully as grave a threat to our survival as was Nazism or communism. With appropriate strategies and consistent policies executed energetically we can defeat and eliminate the Islamic State and its various allied factions.
The Islamic State and its worldwide terrorist allies have become the focus of evil in the modern world.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel warned that we must take the Islamic State seriously when he said, "They are tremendously well funded. This is beyond anything we have seen. ...They marry ideology and a sophistication of strategic and tactical military prowess."
They must be defeated.
Yet defeating terrorists and blackmailers is nothing new in American history.
In the very first years of the new American Republic, then-Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson sent Thomas Barclay, American consul to Morocco, on May 13, 1791, a letter of instructions for a new treaty with Morocco that noted it is "lastly our determination to prefer war in all cases to tribute under any form, and to any people whatever."
Jefferson hated war and loved peace. He also understood that there were times when vicious opponents give peace-loving people no choice but to engage in just war. As president, he sent the Navy and the Marine Corps in 1801 to the shores of Tripoli to reject blackmail, defeat piracy and establish that even a young America could project power in defense of principle and its citizens.
We were saddened but not surprised by the vicious, barbaric video of the killing of James Foley. Back in January we noted that the Islamic State leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, gave a speech in which he warned America, "Soon we'll be in direct confrontation, so watch out for us, for we are with you, watching." They have promised to raise their black flag over the White House.
Because I take very seriously the security of the United States and believe that my highest obligation as president is to protect America, I responded to this direct challenge with a series of quiet steps.
We moved intelligence assets and began monitoring potential Islamic State targets throughout Iraq and Syria.
We began re-establishing ties with both the Sunni tribes in Western Iraq and the Kurdish allies with whom America has worked for decades.
We created an anti--Islamic-State intelligence network working with Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.
We informed the weak, chaotic government in Baghdad that defeating the Islamic State is our highest priority and we will arm, train and coordinate with them and with any effective group prepared to help defeat the Islamic State.
We moved strategic assets including B-1 and B-2 bombers into position to be prepared to respond decisively to any Islamic State outrage.
In response to the deliberately vicious and barbaric killing of James Foley, we began hitting Islamic State targets in both Syria and Iraq. In the last hour over 200 targets have been hit.
The air campaign in coordination with Kurdish, Sunni Arab and Iraqi ground forces will continue until the Islamic State disintegrates and is incapable of holding territory.
The 12,000 terrorists from over 50 countries should understand that they can surrender or we will hunt them down. Terrorists who videotape beheadings operate outside the rule of law and in the tradition of eliminating piracy they will be dealt with as outlaws.
We will coordinate with Great Britain, Egypt, Jordan and every willing partner to develop a strategy and a set of operating principles for the destruction of extremist terrorism.
When Congress returns, I will work directly with its leaders in a bipartisan effort to establish rules for protecting America and defeating this growing cancer of barbarism.
With the bipartisan help of Congress and our allies, we will pursue our campaign to destroy the Islamic State with the four principles I outlined immediately after Beirut. We will have a clear plan to win. We will develop overwhelming forces among the combined civilized world. We will report to you regularly and work every day to keep the support of the American people for the campaign to destroy terrorism. We will define clearly who the enemy is and they will have no sanctuaries.
In confronting an evil that seeks to kill us and destroy our civilization, our goal must be complete and decisive victory.
The Foley family needs your prayers in this difficult time.
America and the forces of freedom need your prayers in this daunting campaign.
Together, civilization will prevail and barbarism will return to the dustbin of history.
Thank you and good night.
Your Friend, ~Newt Gingrich, 2012
Newt
Sign Up for Newt Gingrich's E-Newsletter
Newt Gingrich 2012 Speech – Constitutional Removal of Radical-Liberal Federal Judges
=====================================================
"We have to frankly break the back of the secular-socialist machine, elect people committed to representing the American people, and then methodically rip the system apart."
=====================================================
====== NEWT GINGRICH'S GREAT 2012 CAMPAIGN SPEECHES ======
CPAC 2012 Speech -- Newt Gingrich, U.S. President Elect
CPAC 2012 Speech -- Sarah Palin, U.S. Vice President Elect
Nancy Reagan (1995) : Ronnie turned that Torch over to Newt
NRA Second Amendent Speech -- Newt Gingrich
U.S. Energy Independence in 2012 -- Speech
U.S. Energy Independence in 2012 -- Newt Gingrich
"America's Space Renaissance" in Florida !
Newt Gingrich -- Vision for America in Space Again
Why is Newt Gingrich So Angry ?
Newt Gingrich : South Carolina Victory Speech (2012-01-21)
Newt Gingrich : Christmas Day in 1776 George Washington's "Victory or Death"
Newt Stoutly Defends the Second Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)
Newt Gingrich – Constitutional Removal of Radial-Liberal Federal Judges
Newt Slams an "Increasingly Radical" EPA
Newt Defends Israel and Shows how the Palestinians are an "Invented" people !
Newt Warns against the Proposed 9-11 NYC Islamic Mosque and Islamic Sharia Law
Gingrich Compares Radical-Isalmics Muslims To Nazis
Newt Gingrich On The Threat Of Radical Islam
Newt Gingrich – America’s Defense of Judea-Christian Ideals and Defense against Islamic Fascism
Gingrich: Aggressive Prosecution of Radical-Militant U.S. Muslim Groups
Newt Gingrich: Response to CNN’s John King “Divorce Question”
Newt Gingrich to Juan Williams: Americans Want Paychecks, Not Food Stamps
Gingrich BLASTS Chris Wallace for his "Gotcha" Questions at Iowa Debate
Newt Destroys Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Vis-à-Vis Killing Osama bin Laden
Gingrich: My Credential Is 4.2% Unemployment
Newt Slams Obama's Stupidity on the Keystone Pipeline
Gingrich attacks Federal Reserve (Bernanke and Geitner) Deception and Corruption
Newt Discusses Job Creation and Dismantling Federal (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac)
Newt: No American President Should Bow to a Saudi King
Newt Gingrich: Super PAC Committee Is Washington's Dumbest Idea
=============================================
.
He did not help his cause when he suggested we had to move past Reagan.
Reagan would send over 200 Marines to a hotel as peacekeepers and then maybe give a speech about their deaths.
I do not consider Mrs. Reagan authoritative on such things.
Reagan was correct to not let that change his strategic foreign policy agenda.
Do you know what his administration was doing at the moment that guy killed those 241 Marines?
should I check the archives? Why didn’t he do anything after? Have things escalated since then?
This should be interesting.
Yeah, you should check and see if we brought down the Soviet Empire and ended the Cold War.
At the time that guy blew up the Marines in garrison, the invasion of Grenada had already started, within 47 hours the Army was engaged in ground combat.
People don’t seem to remember, or to even know, that Reagan had a massive military operation against the the Soviets already started during that bombing.
You know Romney isn’t running, right?
Strawmen are pointless on our side and downright pathetic ehrn they have no meaningful context.
I hope he has the grace and good sense for the 2016 presidential race to adopt Reagan's wisdom and drop caring who gets the credit (Reagan's little slogan in his office, "You can accomplish anything if you don't care who gets the credit"). I pray Gingrich puts his talents to better use, because they are needed. I'll bet a lot of people here have zero clue as to the great methodical approach and philosophy he put forth during the last primary for reducing the scope of government in education. One's heart thrilled to read it.
But we need ... to break away from the Republican party, Patton, I'm sorry to say that I am really thinking that for the presidential at least it will be necessary. The Republican party is truly a party for idiots, when that party asks its members to vote for a representative who fully embraces the same government model as the opposition party.
People understand and resent that they're being offered a shallow choice between More Government Crap 1 (Democrat), or More Government Crap 2 (Republican). People know that they want less government and more freedom, and that neither party offers it.
We need a Second Party, at least for the presidential race, and Gingrich would do his best work if he helped make it happen with the right candidate, whoever it is, but it's not Newt. I hope he graciously applies his efforts elsewhere to achieving the same goal: of helping limited government representation find its way into American government.
So they were prepared and let Hezbollah go?
Ronald Reagan would do the exact opposite of Barack Obama.
So no real response to post 9.
Haven’t read the archives. Will check into it though. My son is a 1/8 Marine and his wife is the granddaughter of a survivor. I will find out what I can.
I love Ronald Reagan as much as the next conservative. He is one of my heroes. But he was president 30 years ago. I love listening to his and Margaret Thatcher’s speeches. But I know when I do it that I am indulging in nostalgia. “What would Reagan do” is a bit of a fantasy. We have to figure out what we should do now, based on the people we have leading us now.
That’s good, winning the Cold War and removing the daily threat of total nuclear annihilation and the end of civilization and perhaps almost all of humanity, was a pretty big deal, at least at the time.
The wall came down 6 years later. I’m doing a lot of reading. I remember some of the news and watching some of the Iran-Contra hearings. No wonder my mother gave up on politics. Oh wait. Flash. My mother probably gave up when my brother died in Nam.
I hear you whining throughout the thread, but all I can make out is, that you are an unhappy person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.