Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Gets It Right: Abortions Really do Require a Doctor
Townhall.com ^ | August 23, 2014 | Joanne Moudy

Posted on 08/23/2014 8:54:45 AM PDT by Kaslin

Planned Parenthood took a big hit on Tuesday after the District Court for Polk County, Iowa upheld a ban on “webcam” abortions. Judge Jeffrey Farrell’s ruling concluded that abortions – if done at all – really should be done after a complete medical exam. Better yet, Judge Ferrell ruled that the medical exam should actually be done by a physician – in person – and not via video feed. Well slap my head, imagine that.

In an effort to increase profit margins, Planned Parenthood’s management decided that their rural clinics could save money if they did abortions without having a physician present. To get around that ‘minor’ hurdle they shortcut the system and bypassed the requisite exam, altogether. Then they hired abortion doctors in neighboring cities to ‘consult’ with patients via webcam.

But the Iowa Board of Medicine didn’t take too kindly to killing babies without so much as a brief handshaking. So in August 2013, the Board ruled 8-2 that a physician had to be present when abortion drugs are administered.

As expected, Planned Parenthood challenged the Medical Board’s ruling because apparently it just cost too much to hire physicians to trek an hour out to the rural clinics to kill babies.

Before the Board’s ban, when a woman presented herself to an abortion clinic, she was given forms to fill out and queried about her pregnancy. Assuming the information the mother provided fit the gestational age requirement (and we all know how honest/accurate a teenage girl can be when she’s desperate), she was taken into an exam room where she was connected to an abortion doctor via webcam. The physician supposedly ‘consulted’ with her and then made the decision to dispense the abortion inducing drugs.

The doc pushed a button at his end and a little drawer containing two pills opened at the mother’s end. The mother took one pill at the clinic and then went home. A few days later she took the second pill and – voila – the baby died and was expelled.

Except there have been a few problems with abortifacient drugs, like deaths, strokes and sepsis caused by a total lack of concern, care and/or supervision on the part of abortion providers.

Planned Parenthood’s main argument is that forcing women to travel 60-100 miles to reach a ‘big-city’ clinic with a real doctor, constitutes cruelty and undue hardship. They feel that if a mother reaches the decision to have an elective abortion, she should be able to get it immediately, wherever she lives.

But here’s the thing. Elective abortions never constitute an emergency situation (unless it’s botched) in which case she needs to be as close to a major medical center as she can get.

Otherwise, if a mother is forced to actually plan ahead and drive an hour or two to another city to kill her baby, oh well. That’s an inconvenient sacrifice she will just have to be stuck with.

Considering that you can’t even get antibiotics for a simple ear infection without first having an exam, it’s difficult to imagine a physician risking a woman’s life in order to expedite killing an innocent human being via webcam. Except that abortion doctors and Planned Parenthood aren’t in the game to offer care and compassion, they’re in it for the money.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; prolife

1 posted on 08/23/2014 8:54:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So lemme get this straight.

The world is outraged because a POS in a black mask cuts off the head of somebody’s son, and stacks it up on his body like a little dead rag doll.

But Planned Parenthood is upset because they won’t get to do the same thing to children by remote control.

The U.S. is now certifiably insane.


2 posted on 08/23/2014 8:57:47 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No... they don’t. They require a MURDERER


3 posted on 08/23/2014 9:01:11 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I agree. I do not think it helps the prolife cause to be calling these monsters “doctors”.


4 posted on 08/23/2014 9:02:33 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Agree. Real doctors don’t stop a beating heart.


5 posted on 08/23/2014 9:06:29 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Standard Leftist logic (used loosely) on medical standards is “whatever suites their purpose”.

A gov. school cannot trust an 18-year-old to self-medicate with Advil, but the same gov. school will arrange transportation for a 13-year-old who wants an abortion.


6 posted on 08/23/2014 9:06:57 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Pro-Aborts don’t want women in back alleys using a coat hanger.

They want women in Planned Parenthood clinics using coat hangers.


7 posted on 08/23/2014 9:14:40 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

FReepers! Let's go!
Every donation counts!



September is almost here.
Please Contribute Today!

8 posted on 08/23/2014 9:31:44 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Regulator

So lemme get this straight.

The world is outraged because a POS in a black mask cuts off the head of somebody’s son, and stacks it up on his body like a little dead rag doll.

But Planned Parenthood is upset because they won’t get to do the same thing to children by remote control.

The U.S. is now certifiably insane.
_____________________________________________________

You nailed it!!


9 posted on 08/23/2014 9:36:15 AM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Iowa Gets It Right: Abortions Really do Require a Doctor

Nope; just a KILLER.

And a willing 'mother'.

10 posted on 08/23/2014 10:01:28 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

The Hippocratic Oath wouldn’t allow them to


11 posted on 08/23/2014 10:01:39 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; Artcore; Regulator; MNDude

I think the program should have been continued as it was ... After the first “mother” dies because of sepsis or because her pregnancy was ectopic and it obviously was misdiagnosed because PP thought a video connection was “good enough” I would have loved to see PP sued for $100million for gross negligence.


12 posted on 08/23/2014 10:01:48 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

We’ve been that way for 41 years now.

Surely by now the elephant in the room has crapped all over the floor by now; and broken down the couch!


13 posted on 08/23/2014 10:02:46 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I shudda read ahead...


14 posted on 08/23/2014 10:03:07 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Hippocratic Oath wouldn’t allow them to

Oath, Oath! Very few people give a rats rectum about oaths today.

15 posted on 08/24/2014 9:12:30 AM PDT by dearolddad (/i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Considering that you can’t even get antibiotics for a simple ear infection without first having an exam, it’s difficult to imagine a physician risking a woman’s life in order to expedite killing an innocent human being via webcam.

Seriously?

We're talking about someone who went through a bona fide medical education, and then decided to use that knowledge to kill innocent babies. Why is it so hard to imagine that such a ghoul would have a hard time risking a woman's life? Someone who kills babies certainly has no moral reservations about killing women. They're only restrained because of the law--they don't want to go to jail.

16 posted on 08/25/2014 4:13:34 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson