Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why This Oil Baron Thinks U.S. Oil Production Could Double
fool.com ^ | August 17, 2014 | Adam Galas

Posted on 08/17/2014 3:17:37 PM PDT by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2014 3:17:37 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney; Kennard; bestintxas; nuke rocketeer; crusty old prospector

Scott Scheffield, CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, recently made the news when he stated that he believes U.S. production could not only beat our old record, but could double from last year’s levels to 14 million bpd.

Why would the CEO of a major U.S. oil company make such grand claims? This article will explain the reasons for Mr. Sheffield’s optimism regarding U.S. oil’s continued renaissance and the ramifications for international energy markets and the U.S. economy.


2 posted on 08/17/2014 3:19:25 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

It could but it won’t.

The powers that be don’t want us to be Energy Independent.


3 posted on 08/17/2014 3:22:05 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

And OPEC, the US government and oil companies do not want oil at far under $100.


4 posted on 08/17/2014 3:24:42 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

And the USA consumes 19 million bpd.


5 posted on 08/17/2014 3:25:24 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

When was the last time someone was described as a “recycling baron” or a “green energy baron” or a “organic foods baron” do you think?


6 posted on 08/17/2014 3:26:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The USA would not be energy independent producing 14 million bpd. We would still be importing 5 million bpd.


7 posted on 08/17/2014 3:26:56 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

No but it would be a big step towards it.

You really think we cannot be Energy Independent if we wanted to be?


8 posted on 08/17/2014 3:27:52 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The price of oil would have to rise to about $150 per barrel for US production to reach 19 million bpd. Otherwise it would not be economic to pull the oil from the ground.

That is $6 per gallon gasoline.

The other way is to reduce demand.


9 posted on 08/17/2014 3:31:37 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

“The other way is to reduce demand.”

Which would lower prices and production.


10 posted on 08/17/2014 3:37:14 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

The other consideration is how long can energy independence be sustained.

How long could we produce 19 million bpd?

I have seen estimates from roughly 10-20 years.


11 posted on 08/17/2014 3:38:28 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
What is important about this is that money that presently flows out of the US economy to buy transportation fuels from abroad, would flow into the US economy putting people to work.

You can put foreign workers to work, and pay money into foreign treasuries, or you can put US workers to work and pay money into US tax bases and into the US economy.

According to analyst firm IHS, $890 billion in new energy investment through 2026 could create as many as 1.1 million new, high-paying jobs, and increase the economic growth rate by 0.75% per year.

I think that understates it. Anything approaching energy independence, at least North American energy independence, would turn this economy around so fast your head would spin.

12 posted on 08/17/2014 3:39:01 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Depends.

If we lower demand domestically but global demand rises by enough to compensate then no.


13 posted on 08/17/2014 3:41:06 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

True.


14 posted on 08/17/2014 3:43:11 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

By then we’d have another source, like fusion, sawgrass biomass, coal gasification or who knows what.


15 posted on 08/17/2014 3:46:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

We came up with the atomic bomb and put a man on the moon.

Energy independence is child’s play compared with those two. All that’s lacking is the will.


16 posted on 08/17/2014 3:47:37 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

And OPEC, the US government and oil companies do not want oil at far under $100.
...............
Agree. And this will likely help keep oil prices in the $100 range until +-2020 or so. However, high oil prices will make Sheffield’s prediction of 14 million barrel’s a day inevitable. Why? because fracking oil is high cost oil production. According to Sheffield, the only thing that stands in the way of 14 million barrel @ day US oil production is....low oil prices.

Eventually however, say after +-2020 oil prices will start to fall because of demand destruction caused by natural gas houses trains trucks and buses and electric cars.


17 posted on 08/17/2014 3:50:50 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


18 posted on 08/17/2014 3:51:09 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It could but it won’t.

The powers that be don’t want us to be Energy Independent.
................
that’s just it. the only thing that stands in the way of 14 million barrels @ day in low oil prices. ... however, the powers that be currently want high oil prices. principally because the powers that be in the oil industry are government controlled oil monopolies around the world that require high oil prices to feed their governments.


19 posted on 08/17/2014 3:53:28 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Nope, putting a man on the moon is relatively child’s play when you have the Federal governments black check and a single mission.

East European Jews figured out that the atom bomb was theoretically possible. That was the genius and difficult part. The US government figured out the specific formula by using massive dollars and man hours to figure out the exact recipe.

This is the forever war. We can’t write every energy consumer a blank check.

Maybe a genius at MIT or Cal Tech will figure it out. Put you simply can’t force genius results with a massive check and massive man hours.


20 posted on 08/17/2014 3:55:43 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson