Posted on 08/17/2014 3:17:37 PM PDT by ckilmer
August 17, 2014 | Comments (0)
America's oil production is on a roll. After peaking in November of 1970 at 10 million barrels per day (bpd) and declining for nearly 40 years to a low of just 5 million bpd in 2008, today's oil production has soared 67%. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) is expecting another 13.6% increase by 2016 to 9.5 million bpd, before production tapers off in 2020.
This miracle has been made possible by soaring shale oil production out of Texas and North Dakota, which saw their production levels jump 117% and 177%, respectively, from 2010-2013.
Source: EIA
Scott Scheffield, CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, recently made the news when he stated that he believes U.S. production could not only beat our old record, but could double from last year's levels to 14 million bpd.
Why would the CEO of a major U.S. oil company make such grand claims? This article will explain the reasons for Mr. Sheffield's optimism regarding U.S. oil's continued renaissance and the ramifications for international energy markets and the U.S. economy.
223 billion reasons to bet on the U.S.
The EIA estimates that the U.S. has 223 billion barrels of technically recoverable shale oil. Pioneer Natural Resources estimates that 75 billion barrels are located in the Permian Basin alone, in the Spraberry/Wolfcamp shale formations. That estimate is up 50% in the last year.
Source: 2014 Hart Energy Permian conference presentation.
Three catalysts for continued production growth
While the recent success of U.S. oil production and its large potential is impressive enough, there are three factors that could cause production to continue to climb much higher and longer than the EIA or even Mr. Sheffield are expecting.
The first of these is the fact that estimates of technically recoverable oil are likely to increase dramatically in the years to come. For example, in the EIA's 2011 world shale and tight oil report, the organization estimated that the world had 32 billion barrels of technically recoverable shale/tight oil reserves. By 2013, those estimates had increased nearly 11-fold to 345 billion barrels. Given the fact that the EIA estimates 3.357 trillion barrels of shale oil resources exist in the world, even today's lofty estimates are likely only scratching the surface of what future technology can accomplish.
Which brings me to the second cause for optimism, technological innovation. Steven Mueller, CEO of Southwestern Energy (one of the largest gas producers in America), recently expressed confidence that energy companies will be able to greatly increase energy production out of "all of Midland and West Texas... this is an area ripe for some huge increases."
The key to this increased production is improvements in technology such as better hydraulic fracturing, horizontal drilling, and enhanced oil recovery methods. This last technique specifically refers to CO2 injection into oil wells, which can increase shale oil recovery rates from as low as 2%-3% to 15.1%, and simultaneously help fight climate change.
While 15% recovery rates may not sound impressive, consider this: For each 1% increase in global oil recovery rates, the world gains up to an additional 88 billion barrels of economically recoverable reserves. That's enough oil to supply the world for nearly three years.
The third oil production growth catalyst is economics. The EIA expects the long-term price of oil to increase to $141/barrel from today's $104/barrel by 2040. While that 36% increase may appear steep, it only represents a 1.2% annual increase in oil prices, which is less than the current rate of inflation of 2.1%.
Slowly rising oil prices will mean oil companies can continue to increase spending on new technology and production expansion projects -- they already spend $650 billion/year -- which is likely to keep U.S. economically recoverable reserves estimates rising, right along with our production and our economy.
Jobs and global security
According to analyst firm IHS, $890 billion in new energy investment through 2026 could create as many as 1.1 million new, high-paying jobs, and increase the economic growth rate by 0.75% per year.
Besides obvious economic benefits, increasing U.S. oil production could be a boon to geopolitical stability. For example, right now, civil wars and unrest in Iraq, Syria, and Libya, and sanctions against Iran, mean that 4% of global oil supplies are off the market. The threat of oil sanctions against Russia means that number could, in a particularly dire scenario, quadruple to 16%.
A doubling of U.S. oil production would greatly help America and its allies reduce their energy dependence on hostile regimes, many who wish to undermine us or outright do us harm.
America's oil boom has been nothing short of spectacular, but there are many reasons to believe the best is yet to come. Surging U.S. oil supplies may never make the U.S. energy independent, but it can marginalize the importance of politically unstable tinder boxes like the Middle East and provide a major boost to the American economy.
Scott Scheffield, CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, recently made the news when he stated that he believes U.S. production could not only beat our old record, but could double from last year’s levels to 14 million bpd.
Why would the CEO of a major U.S. oil company make such grand claims? This article will explain the reasons for Mr. Sheffield’s optimism regarding U.S. oil’s continued renaissance and the ramifications for international energy markets and the U.S. economy.
It could but it won’t.
The powers that be don’t want us to be Energy Independent.
And OPEC, the US government and oil companies do not want oil at far under $100.
And the USA consumes 19 million bpd.
When was the last time someone was described as a “recycling baron” or a “green energy baron” or a “organic foods baron” do you think?
The USA would not be energy independent producing 14 million bpd. We would still be importing 5 million bpd.
No but it would be a big step towards it.
You really think we cannot be Energy Independent if we wanted to be?
The price of oil would have to rise to about $150 per barrel for US production to reach 19 million bpd. Otherwise it would not be economic to pull the oil from the ground.
That is $6 per gallon gasoline.
The other way is to reduce demand.
“The other way is to reduce demand.”
Which would lower prices and production.
The other consideration is how long can energy independence be sustained.
How long could we produce 19 million bpd?
I have seen estimates from roughly 10-20 years.
You can put foreign workers to work, and pay money into foreign treasuries, or you can put US workers to work and pay money into US tax bases and into the US economy.
According to analyst firm IHS, $890 billion in new energy investment through 2026 could create as many as 1.1 million new, high-paying jobs, and increase the economic growth rate by 0.75% per year.
I think that understates it. Anything approaching energy independence, at least North American energy independence, would turn this economy around so fast your head would spin.
Depends.
If we lower demand domestically but global demand rises by enough to compensate then no.
True.
By then we’d have another source, like fusion, sawgrass biomass, coal gasification or who knows what.
We came up with the atomic bomb and put a man on the moon.
Energy independence is child’s play compared with those two. All that’s lacking is the will.
And OPEC, the US government and oil companies do not want oil at far under $100.
...............
Agree. And this will likely help keep oil prices in the $100 range until +-2020 or so. However, high oil prices will make Sheffield’s prediction of 14 million barrel’s a day inevitable. Why? because fracking oil is high cost oil production. According to Sheffield, the only thing that stands in the way of 14 million barrel @ day US oil production is....low oil prices.
Eventually however, say after +-2020 oil prices will start to fall because of demand destruction caused by natural gas houses trains trucks and buses and electric cars.
.
It could but it won’t.
The powers that be don’t want us to be Energy Independent.
................
that’s just it. the only thing that stands in the way of 14 million barrels @ day in low oil prices. ... however, the powers that be currently want high oil prices. principally because the powers that be in the oil industry are government controlled oil monopolies around the world that require high oil prices to feed their governments.
Nope, putting a man on the moon is relatively child’s play when you have the Federal governments black check and a single mission.
East European Jews figured out that the atom bomb was theoretically possible. That was the genius and difficult part. The US government figured out the specific formula by using massive dollars and man hours to figure out the exact recipe.
This is the forever war. We can’t write every energy consumer a blank check.
Maybe a genius at MIT or Cal Tech will figure it out. Put you simply can’t force genius results with a massive check and massive man hours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.