So she was running away, shot in the back and fell in the alley. Then he walks up to her and as she pleads for her life he shoots her twice??!! He’ll be in prison for the rest of his sorry life.
Autopsies will have to confirm entry points AND pregnancy, if any. Also, presence of weapons on the non-breathing participants.
Yep. She was a thief, but he is a murderer.
However, one is reminded of that scene from the film "Gran Torino" in which Clint Eastwood says, "You know how every now and then you run into somebody you shouldn't have fxxxxd with? That's me."
Only if the jury votes to convict.
Yes, the man was wrong in his actions, to most people’s opinion. He was born in 1934, and grew up in a nation that is different from today’s. Different social mores, different laws, and different attitudes. Did he serve in the Korean War? Was he an infantry man? I have no idea either, but that is possible. We do not know. He may well have continued to believe his life was in danger. He was eliminating his perceived threat. I would like to be on that jury.
BTW, you have a wonderful home page. The results were well worth the efforts. Thank you
His sorry life?
Put yourself in his situation jackass.
Some more information: She was not pregnant. He probably fired the first shots in his house.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3185135/posts
“McDonnell would not say whether Miller was shot in the back as Greer said. He also declined to say how many shots were fired and whether either of the suspects was hit inside the house before fleeing.”