Oh good Lord no.
Dammit! Why?!
No more retreads!
She’s reading from the latest book by Rick Santorum, “How to Make a Fortune as a Perpetual Presidential Candidate, Even If You Don’t Stand a Chance”
Nooooooooooooooooo.
No Romney
No Bachmann
No Huckabee
No Ron Paul
No Newt
They day that she announces you’ll see Jon Stewart, Steven Colbert, and Bill Maher doing the happy dance.
give it up
I have no problem with Michelle Bachmann at all. A solid conservative. Far better than Romchristibush. Perhaps better than Rand Paul. And would completely neutralize the ‘first woman president’ label that is Hillary!’s only selling point.
But she doesn’t stand a chance. She’s been out of the game too long.
The last thing the GOP needs is a side show whereby the media can twist words to cast republicans as boobs.
She needs to reconsider.
Bad idea. We need one and ONLY ONE conservative.
Anything else splits the primary vote and we end up with a Romney.
Interesting comments. Just for myself, I thought Bachmann looked rather promising Certainly better than several of the other names we keep getting fed. Remember also that Bachman ( and a couple other candidates) were pretty much targeted by huge leftist money to cripple her last candidacy. I, for one, would welcome hearing more from her I think she may add positively to the GOP nomination discourse. And we’ll see ....
*****************************
That's decidedly unpresidential. Bachmann should retire.
“Running” for president must be a big money maker why else do the same people, who must know they are never going to win, keep running?
I’d vote for Michelle in a heartbeat. She is as conservative as they come, which is more than I can say about most of the posers, er, posters, on this thread.
NO!
Her voice is too high, and she piled onto Romney—along with Gingrich and others—for “vulture capitalism,” which I thought was opportunistic and vicious.