Posted on 06/28/2014 1:44:58 PM PDT by RightGeek
Saturday at a press conference from the Rio Grande Valley, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) discussed her tour of a border holding facility and addressed the humanitarian crisis of thousands unaccompanied minors flooding across the U.S.-Mexico border, which she called a "humanitarian opportunity."[snip]
She also said she wished she could take them home with her.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What the hell is she doing in Texas? We have our own congress people, Stretch.
That idiot needs to be put out of our mystery.
Crazy talk.
It is inhumane to encourage children to walk across a desert.
It is inhumane to leave children the ravages of nature and animals.
It is inhumane to put children in peril of savages would rape them.
it is inhumane to give slavers children to prey on and sell into debasing servitude.
It is inhumane to cause a child to suffer without their parents.
It is inhumane that a child could be disfigured because their parents abandoned them.
It is inhumane the country if their birth would allow all the above to happen to a child
it is inhumane to put a child to suffering by horrible diseases which can kill them or cripple them.
it is inhumane to cause a child to be dependent upon others for their existence
It is cruel and inhumane to . . . .
Another generated crisis they have answers for. Warm up the gallows
LOL!
All According to Plan.
Pelosi on the Border: We Have to Use This 'Crisis' as an 'Opportunity' (Video)
.
(The Cloward–Piven strategy involves draining and overloading the system, in order to get the political change they want.)
When California joins Aztlán, those kids will need representation in el Distrito Federal. They must be trained now, now I say, to vote early and often. They must learn that their loyal votes will be rewarded, too. Nancy will give them any treasures the gringos have left.
"¡Niños mios, bienvenidos, el gobierno os ama!"
She is an idiot.
My intro to Cloward-Piven was the Sept. 28, 2008 article by Jim Simpson at American Thinker, Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis. I about fell out of my chair when I read this. I sent it to everyone I knew and hoped it would somehow spread to everyone's email in box. It didn't. He got elected. . .
Jim Simpson's series of article on Cloward-Piven can be found here: James Simpson’s Cloward-Piven, Manufactured Crisis Articles Real eye openers. Hat tip to Gulag Bound.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy Chart. Very interesting connections.
All part of the planned socialist destruction of America.
I would love to ask Nancy Pelosi what she knows about the Cloward-Piven strategy. The denial and non-verbal would be priceless.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts
The link is to a long article called “The Revolution Was”, written in 1938 by Garet Garrett about The New Deal. FDR was using similar tactics as Cloward-Piven, just as tyrants had before him. And if you read the entire article, it is amazing how close obama is in following FDR’s path.
An excerpt from the beginning:
There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs to freedom.
There are those who have never ceased to say very earnestly, “Something is going to happen to the American form of government if we don’t watch out.”
These were the innocent disarmers. Their trust was in words. They had forgotten their Aristotle. More than 2,000 years ago he wrote of what can happen within the form, when “one thing takes the place of another, so that the ancient laws will remain, while the power will be in the hands of those who have brought about revolution in the state.”
Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.
But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.
The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake.
The test came in the first one hundred days.
No matter how carefully a revolution may have been planned there is bound to be a crucial time. That comes when the actual seizure of power is taking place. In this case certain steps were necessary. They were difficult and daring steps.
But more than that, they had to be taken in a certain sequence, with forethought and precision of timing. One out of place might have been fatal. What happened was that one followed another in exactly the right order, not one out of time or out of place.
Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.
The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.
The end held constantly in view was power.
In a revolutionary situation mistakes and failures are not what they seem. They are scaffolding. Error is not repealed. It is compounded by a longer law, by more decrees and regulations, by further extensions of the administrative hand.
As deLawd said in The Green Pastures, that when you have passed a miracle you have to pass another one to take care of it, so it was with the New Deal. Every miracle it passed, whether it went right or wrong, had one result. Executive power over the social and economic life of the nation was increased. Draw a curve to represent the rise of executive power and look there for the mistakes. You will not find them. The curve is consistent.
From Wilson, to FDR, the Clintons and now Obama, the juggernaut presses ahead. Getting this information to people is our main obstacle. Education is the key.
“We are all Americans — north and south in this hemisphere,”
I once said this to some Canadians. They disagreed stridently. “We’re NOT Americans. We’re Canadians.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.