Let us remember that this full-court press against the BSA [I was a Cub Scout and Boy Scout] is not about suddenly changing its policy to disallow homosexuals being put in charge of children whose parents might not share their views of their sexuality.
This sanction is for NOT changing to what Our Betters have now decided is the 'correct' policy. It is punishment for non-conformance with what is first and foremost a personal value system. That certainly applies as to what is deemed appropriate behavior around other people's children.
If some people decide to found a homosexual-friendly childrens’ group, I am quite sure the BSA and their supporters would not utter a word of objection, much less try to obstruct them from associating as they see fit according to their personal values.
Why cannot those who do not want their children taught [that homosexuality is what the elites say it is] have that same choice, if we are supposed to be pro-choice. Are Americans entitled to raise their children according to their own values or is this now subject to the approval of the Collective as proclaimed by an arrogant elite?
No it means that the California bench is unworthy to have those judges serve on it.
So that whole deal about gay marriage and that amendment was just a farce?
these judges need some tar and feathers
I don’t care what side you are on, this is unconstitutional. I don’t care if it gets a 100% vote support, any law that would mandate what private groups an individual can belong to is illegal. I’m not a Boy Scouts fan after all the caving they have done, but this can’t stand.
Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics
do they have THAT TITLE of thier business cards?
BTW rumor has it that former winemaker Stu Pidaso is charing the commitee
We knew they wouldn’t be satisfied with the scouts’ acceptance of gay scouts, and that they would go for the leaders next.
Another once-great American institution bites the dust.
Judges should be banned from being members of the demonrat party, since it is a traitorous and terror-by-abortion promoting racketeering organization.
The US constitution guarantees freedom of religion and freedom of association.The government has no business regulating thought. It is absolutely bizarre that an official sworn to uphold that constitution is expected to surrender those rights if he is to hold public office as a judge. This is really an attempt by the Left to encode their bizarre politically correct thought as a prerequisite to holding public office.
Even after they let them have the Sudetenland?
My God, they’re vicious!
1st amendment Fags!!!!!
Freedom of association
Freedom of thought
Freedom of Spression
Freedom O religion
Sumpin likey that
I would care if the Boy Scouts didn’t cave in. They caved expecting love from the left...they choose poorly.
“Does this mean that judges whose religious beliefs [e.g. observant Christians, Jews, Muslims] do not comport with Secular Humanist orthodoxy are by definition unfit to serve on the bench? “
Oh, that’s DEFINITELY the idea...
I hope they live their new liberal friends after pissing off their age old support base
Christians will be official second class caste in Kalipornia
Who cares? The BSA should be disbanded. Any parent who allows his or her child to be in this organization might as well let them join NAMBLA.
This is Kalifornia. Worse than North Korea in many ways.