Ron Paul: Rand Will Get Hit with Disadvantages in Presidential Bid for Being My Son

Breitbart News ^ | April 16, 2014 | Breitbart TV

[This Just In]

Wednesday on Fox News Channel's "Your World" with Neil Cavuto former Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) discussed the IRS targeting his organization when Cavuto asked, "Well, i don't want to be cynical Congressman, do you think any of this might have a thing or two to do with your son possibly running for president? "

[ansel12]

Who knows what you are trying to say, it sure isn’t Rand Paul’s campaigning on gay marriage.

[HiTech RedNeck]

That’s Paul’s general idea.

Call him mad, call him bad, call him sad, but he’s the only one I’ve seen who wants to take the bloat by the horns. Could it be he’s wiser than the rest, although having difficulty explaining how?

[HiTech RedNeck]

He says he wants to leave it ALONE. With your two dimensional thinking you contort that into beckoning it on.

[ansel12]

Only months after the Romney/Obama election, and you are already using the hail Mary ‘the rino/libertarian is better than the democrat’ argument.

We are years away from that weird form of promoting Paul, making any sense.

There is no reason for any conservative to be doing anything other than dismissing the incoherent Paul at this moment.

[ansel12]

He says he wants to leave it ALONE.

He is running for president, now that Obama just created gay marriage at the federal level, Paul "wants to leave it alone", that means that he and you are pro-gay marriage.

Let's oppose gay marriage, not support it.

[Kit cat]

Rand Paul would be fine with me as a matter of fact I WOULD WALK OVER HOT COALS TO VOTE FOR HIM AFTER HAVING SEEN HOW
QUICKLY OUR REPUBLIC HAS FALLEN!!! I for one am NO LONGER
looking for the PERFECT CANDIDATE I just want someone TO SHRINK
THIS DAMNED MONSTROSITY OF A GOVERNMENT!!!!

[ansel12]

I FIRMLY believe can get our country A MUCH SMALLER government the social issues will take care of themselves!!!

The problem is one man, one vote, social liberalism creates more big government voters.

Social conservatism breeds more conservative, limited government voters.

[Kit cat]

Social issues at this time NEED TO BE PUT ON THE BACK BURNER,!!
Government is OUT OF CONTROL!!!! WAY OUT OF CONTROL!!!!
WE should ALL be concerned with shrinking this BEAST above EVERYTHING else!!! Social issues will follow!!!! STATES should be taking
control of SOCIAL issues!!! If you choose to live in a liberal cesspool you
can move to one NO PROBLEM!!!! FEDS should ge out of our lives!!!!

[Kit cat]

ge=be

[ansel12]

Social liberalism is how the government got so big and so much control, the only people voting against liberalism and big government, are the social conservatives.

The more society breaks down, the more people want to vote for more government and more welfare and short term gains.

If you want government control and the feds in your life, then keep fighting against social conservatism, it has worked for the left for 50 years.

[Kit cat]

Rand Paul IS NOT a social conservative, HE IS a small government
conservative!!! All I am saying is if he IS our choice I WILL happily vote
for him younger voters seem to like him he is ALL about individual freedoms end of story!!! All of our MAJOR social issues will correct with
SMALLER GOVERNMENT!!!!

[ansel12]

What I'm trying to tell you, is that social liberalism doesn't make people start voting for small government, it makes them vote for MORE big government, more welfare, more social programs, the left has known that for 50 years, it is why they love social liberalism, it creates more of their kind of voters and it REDUCES the number of limited government voters.

Rand Paul can claim to for small government, but he supports politics that increase the size of government.

Have you seen this voting chart on how people vote left or right?

It is the social conservatives/religious who are the old fashioned, limited government, traditional American voters, not social liberals, social liberalism creates liberal voters.

[SoConPubbie]

And he also won this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference’s straw poll.

The same way every Paul has won the CPAC poll and online poll, by stuffing the ballot box in an attempt to distort the picture concerning their popularity.

[SoConPubbie]

See #12. The ACU disagrees. Maybe you are not a real conservative.

Yea, the ACU calls a lot of people conservative that aren't conservative. They are the least reliable "conservative" polling organization out there in spite of their name as evidenced by weekly comparisons done by cotton.

[SoConPubbie]

But he has the ‘leave it to the states’ position that most have adopted on gay marriage, which is...tolerable.

How is that tolerable?

It's a sham and a scam!

It's a scam because Rand Paul, and every politician pushing this ploy, knows that position is handily defeated by the "Equal Protection Clause" of the 14th Amendment which is being used RIGHT NOW by Federal Courts everywhere to overturn State Level Constitutional Amendments against Gay Marriage.

[SoConPubbie]

“undying love for illegal aliens”

Nonsense. Get a grip.

Here are the links, from last year, where Rand Paul clearly lays out his own Amnesty plan for 2 million illegals per year, based on a "Certification" from a Pro-Amnesty congress that the border is "secure". No Fence, No E-Verify, No punishments for ID Fraud, and all the other misdemeanors and felonies committed by the Undocumented Democrats he wants to pardon.

Sen. Rand Paul: Trust but verify on immigration reform (Feburary 8th, 2013)

Rand Paul’s “Undocumented Citizens” Path to Legality (and Citizenship) (March 20, 2013)

Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform (March 19, 2013 Article)

Rand Paul's presence-and-jobs amnesty -- WITHOUT E-Verify


No, America Does Not Have “De Facto Amnesty”

GOP's Rand Paul, Dems' Luis Gutierrez in step on immigration reform

Rand Paul: Pathway To Citizenship Is Needed, E-Verify Is Not

Rand Paul On Illegals: Trust But Verify

Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul?

Paul: Republican Party in Need of Facelift

[SoConPubbie]

Would you vote for Paul if it was he against Hitlery?

The proper reply, in all such nonsense moral dilemmas, is too vote with your morals, with your principles.

When someone shows he is not trustable by doing the following:

1. Supporting policy that downplays social issues.
2. Defining a policy that is simply just Amnesty
3. Supporting the GOP-E over the Tea-Party (McConnell over Bevin)

The only course of action to an actual conservative is to do exactly what Alexander Hamilton proposed, NOT SUPPORTING someone who does not support and defend your values, A.K.A., you find another candidate that does support your values and morals and principles and you support them and vote for them, even if it is a third-party candidate.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

[BarnacleCenturion]

“stuffing the ballot box”

It must be nice to be able to just make up lies without the need to provide any evidence. It probably makes you feel good but I doubt that your vile comments are convincing anyone.

Is Cruz registering above single digits in any poll yet?

I have yet to hear your take on his comment that he is against mass deportations. Isn’t that amnesty?

[SoConPubbie]

It must be nice to be able to just make up lies without the need to provide any evidence. It probably makes you feel good but I doubt that your vile comments are convincing anyone.

Not lies, just common knowledge.

Paulbots are well-known for spamming online polls and well-known for being bussed in to overload the CPAC polls.

Ignore the truth all you want, but trying to use a CPAC poll to establish a position concerning Rand Paul's popularity is just hogwash.

[laplata]

Hitlery will win.