1 posted on
04/16/2014 8:57:26 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
All law making is a moral activity. All laws are an expression of some underlying moral imperative.
2 posted on
04/16/2014 9:01:06 AM PDT by
ckilmer
To: Kaslin
What next? Legalized prostitution?
3 posted on
04/16/2014 9:02:22 AM PDT by
eclectic
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: Kaslin
4 posted on
04/16/2014 9:02:27 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: Kaslin
"So why on earth is Lee co-sponsoring a bill introduced last month that would ban online gambling throughout the country, instead of letting each state decide whether to allow Internet-assisted poker?" Because Lee - like 99% of people - only believes in states' rights when it benefits issues he likes (assuming he truly believes in the concept at all).
5 posted on
04/16/2014 9:03:45 AM PDT by
gdani
(Every day, your Govt surveils you more than the day before)
To: Kaslin
I can’t decide if this article is an attack against Republicans or Tea Partiers.
Probably both since it has a libertarian smell to it.
This is crap.
6 posted on
04/16/2014 9:04:49 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Kaslin
the unprincibled are the ones asking
7 posted on
04/16/2014 9:08:16 AM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: Kaslin
I think marijuana decriminalization is a smart compromise vs legalization. It wouldn’t really change anything much because few people if any go to jail for possession anyway but lots of taxpayer dollars are wasted prosecuting it.
Decriminalization vs legalization won’t lead to growth of government because a small fine for getting caught is better than paying a tax every time.
8 posted on
04/16/2014 9:08:19 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Kaslin
I think potheads are pathetic, but that’s a completely different matter than whether or not I think they should be crushed by the federal government. Justice Thomas made the right call in Gonzales v. Raich.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich#Dissenting_opinions
In a federalist system, we permit other states and people to decide how they want to live even if we disagree with them. For one thing, that means we can live together peacefully as one nation. For another, it means the states are free to experiment and maybe prove or disprove the value of a given policy, like the legalization of marijuana.
10 posted on
04/16/2014 9:09:20 AM PDT by
CitizenUSA
(Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional "rights" cherished by Democrats.)
To: Kaslin
Do-gooders exist in both parties and they would reform and control society to their own liking.
They are certainly not federalists. One could argue they also do not value the Constitution...which is, ultimately, a federal documents which leaves such decisions to the states, and the People, respectively.
11 posted on
04/16/2014 9:09:53 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Kaslin
The Republican Party can never serve as a credible opponent to the limitless expansion of government by statists - because they are statists, too.
Two generations of Americans will need to eventually relearn the old lesson that state power kills people who get in its way. Only then will a credible opposition emerge - but they won't have neat haircuts and expensive suits and polite manners.
12 posted on
04/16/2014 9:09:58 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
To: Kaslin
Go back to being for smaller government and a stronger economy, and most people won’t care about the social issues.
15 posted on
04/16/2014 9:14:50 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Kaslin
“...and that view is especially common among young voters.”
Gee, the same group that favors anal sex, abortion, and taxing the rich at 100%.
17 posted on
04/16/2014 9:20:15 AM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
To: Kaslin
Answer: Sheldon Adelson pays the bills.
21 posted on
04/16/2014 9:55:47 AM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Kaslin
So why on earth is Lee co-sponsoring a bill introduced last month that would ban online gambling throughout the country... good question for Goober Graham ,too.
24 posted on
04/16/2014 10:06:17 AM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
To: Kaslin
I don’t like pot and gambling but Republicans look old when they tell people under 30, sorry, you’re not allowed to do that on our watch.
That is what conservatism passes for these days - telling locals Washington is always right.
28 posted on
04/16/2014 10:37:55 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Right now it's all just one big uniparty called 'STATISM' as far as I am concerned. Couple of months old article.
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
52 posted on
06/14/2014 7:48:29 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Kaslin
It doesn’t feel like tyranny if you agree with it.
53 posted on
06/14/2014 7:50:36 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Kaslin
Interesting topic, but even more so is the tone. As someone who’s sympathetic to the author’s points, the abrasiveness of his writing doesn’t convince me to join him. It pushes me away.
57 posted on
06/14/2014 8:12:39 AM PDT by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson