Posted on 03/30/2014 12:36:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t think Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Yes, his father was born in Kenya, and his brother was born in Kenya. But that doesn’t mean he himself was born in Kenya.
And yes, for 16 years he allowed his literary agent to circulate a one-paragraph bio stating that he was born in Kenya, which was revised numerous times over the years while continuing to state that he was born in Kenya. But I’m inclined to think he did that because it seemed cool and a way to sell books and not because it was true.
And yes, he refuses to release his college transcripts, as other presidents and candidates have done. But I’m guessing that’s because they show poor grades and not because they state he was a foreign student.
And yes, for many years he attended a church where the pastor sometimes exclaimed, “God damn America!” but I think he was just trying to fit in.
No, I don’t think he’s Kenyan.
But I wonder whether he’s Manchurian.
“The Manchurian Candidate” was a 2004 movie about a U.S. politician who was secretly a “sleeper agent” working to overthrow American democracy. (Manchuria is the region of Russia and China where the agent had been brainwashed into working for the other side.)
Here’s why I wonder:
When Obama came into office, he announced that he was “resetting” America’s relationship with Russia. Sure enough, he then canceled the planned defensive missiles in Poland aimed at deterring a Russian invasion. That infuriated our Polish allies and pleased the Russians. He got nothing from the Russians in return that we know of.
Vladimir Putin was then the Russian prime minister, and Dmitri Medvedev was the Russian president. Putin was the boss, and Medvedev was his handpicked puppet.
Later, Obama spoke at a seminar with Medvedev, who speaks English. Putin was not there.
During a break, Obama approached Medvedev on the stage. Thinking his microphone was off, he said privately, just one on one, “This is my last election. After my election, I’ll have more flexibility.” The context was a discussion on defense. Good puppet that he was, Medvedev promised, “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
But the microphone was not off. The exchange was captured and recorded. And the pair also were captured by a distant video camera showing Obama warmly shaking the hand of Medvedev and patting Medvedev’s knee as they completed the exchange.
Ask yourself this: Why did Obama choose an awkward in-person exchange on a stage at a seminar for delivery of this important message? Why didn’t he simply pick up the phone in the Oval Office and call Putin directly? Could it be because he didn’t want any Americans to hear it — even White House aides and interpreters?
Fast forward another two years. Russia has invaded a sovereign nation, Ukraine, and has purported to annex part of it. Obama’s response so far has been to impose “sanctions” that are so trivial that the Russians have literally laughed at them.
Putin refuses to state whether he will extend his invasion farther into Ukraine or re-invade the East European countries that were liberated by the fall of the Soviet empire in 1991 — an event that Putin has repeatedly declared was “the major geopolitical disaster of the century.”
In contrast to Putin’s poker face, Obama — without being told Putin’s next move insofar as we know — has ruled out military options. In short, Putin has refused to rule out annexing additional sovereign nations, and Obama has refused to guarantee that he’ll stop him.
In dealing with foreign dictators gassing their people as they did in Syria, threatening to “wipe Israel off the map” with a nuclear attack as Iran repeatedly has done, invading sovereign nations as Russia has now done or threatening to reduce America to “radioactive dust” as one of Putin’s apparatchiks recently did, Obama promises “resets” and “flexibility.”
On those promises, by golly, he’s delivered. He boasts that his strategy constitutes “leading from behind.” (I wonder if he imagines that Putin is “following from the front.”)
In dealing with Americans, on the other hand, he shows less flexibility, gives few “resets” and most decidedly leads from the front. The White House uses the National Security Agency to spy on Americans, uses the IRS to target Americans with whom it disagrees politically, refuses to rescue American diplomats begging for help as they’re slaughtered in Benghazi, calls the American political party that freed the slaves “hostage takers” and, most recently, uses the CIA to conduct surveillance on American senators (according to the longtime Democratic senator who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee).
One more thing: That seminar — the one where Obama made his fateful promise to the Russians that in his defense of freedom and liberty he would be flexible — was in South Korea, just a few hundred miles from Manchuria.
Born in Hawaii, raised to be anti-American. Read the following interview with Paul Kengor:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/jamie-glazov/valerie-jarretts-influence-on-obama/
It's just like the word "marriage" and means whatever you want it to.
Or like the word "Red" in politics meant "Communist" and now means "Republican".
Or "Gay" now means "homosexual" (but you can't say "homosexual" any more).
You also won't hear many self-identify as "Communist" now.
That word was changed to "liberal" for a while, but now they call themselves "progressive".
It's tricky, but I find it's helpful to read Isaiah 9 substituting "America" for any references to "Israel" and my situational awareness and understanding improves.
Brietbart was onto this and the bio was published shortly after Brietbart died (murdered). Sent a strong message for those with the info to keep quiet. He would not have said in that bio that he was born in Kenya unless he was. I recall reading that Kenyan press was bragging that “Kenyan born” Bo was set to be US Senator. Republicans and all of Congress are guilty in the cover up. Putin knows the truth and is blackmailing him in my opinion.
And the pay off was the Malaysian jet with the 20 geniuses on board who invented the cloaking technology to avoid radar. Where’s the plane? Moscow.
Any article that starts with the assumption that the myth of “Obama” is all true, isn’t worth reading.
There is no evidence to back up that his parents in his “autobiography” written by Ayers are his real parents, nor his place/date of birth, etc.
So there is no foundation for the rest of the article.
The author is just starting to wonder now?
“She” wasn’t his mother so all that is irrelevant.
Regardless of where he was born, he was obviously raised to be anti-American and is trying to destroy America.
This is odd, but I believe this one’s true.
The Manchurian Candidate (1962) - IMDb
This isn't a pass... what's being said here is if Obama's a mind control victim that's serious. We could have an enemy of the United States in the White House - UNDER THE CONTROL of Russians... or maybe the Chinese... And compared to the other stuff, he's absolutely right - this would be a horror.
If Obama's a Manchurian Candidate it's the worst thing that could happen to our country. It trumps everything else. Worse than a president lying about where he was born, worse than using drugs, worse than sitting in a church with the minister saying 'G-d Damn America', worse than using the IRS against his political enemies, worse than using the FBI against Republicans, worse than purging the military - worse than all of it together...
It might just be as simple as Vladimir, having been KGB himself (if that is fact) knows exactly who zero is, and that knowledge lets him play the man like a little violin.
That is not suprising. What IS surprising is that was published in The Aspen Times.
It is proof that the wheels are coming off the wagon.
In dealing with foreign dictators gassing their people as they did in Syria, threatening to “wipe Israel off the map” with a nuclear attack as Iran repeatedly has done, invading sovereign nations as Russia has now done - or threatening to reduce America to “radioactive dust” as one of Putin’s apparatchiks recently did, - Obama promises “resets” and “flexibility.”
On those promises, by golly, he’s delivered. He boasts that his strategy constitutes “leading from behind.” (I wonder if he imagines that Putin is “following from the front.”)
In dealing with Americans, on the other hand, he shows less flexibility, gives few “resets” and most decidedly leads from the front.
The White House uses the National Security Agency to spy on Americans,
uses the IRS to target Americans with whom it disagrees politically,
refuses to rescue American diplomats begging for help as they’re slaughtered in Benghazi,
calls the American political party that freed the slaves “hostage takers”
and, most recently, uses the CIA to conduct surveillance on American senators
(according to the longtime Democratic senator who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee).
.
Whoops, sorry about the typo GreyFriar, my fingers Fr-strayed!!
Thanks Lucy.
Victim or volunteer?
McCain was probably a victim in the Hanoi Hilton. It's one of the few things that could explain him and his behavior.
obama, otoh, acts and sounds like a long-term true believer and more likely would be a volunteer, assuming he needed the programming at all.
His rise to office, including the Nobel for nothing, was well scripted and choreographed.
The sequel should bring down the house, so to speak.
Inspector Smith arrested!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
