Posted on 03/19/2014 4:25:04 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
Colorado ping
They actually like Chickenlooper?
Rasmussen Reports is posting very similar numbers. Udall has more than Obamacare to deal with. There are charges that he tried to bully a state insurance official to lie about the number of policy cancellations. There are also rumors that he revealed classified information during a Senate committee hearing.
City slicker demoRats like socialist Chickenpooper. He had been mayor of Denver. He has done several laws against energy production endearing him to the Econazies.
Ditch BOTH Chickenlooper AND Udall!
So why is chickenpooper so wildly popular?
Can someone translate this?
Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
I guess if you are from Colorado this means something? I live in Hawaii and don’t know any of those names and being there is NO D or R after any of there names, useless info.
They are both DemoRats that need replacing for the good of the state and nation (in the case of Udall).
Second paragraph helps a bit with the Udall/Gardner explanation.
But, to help out, Udall = ultra liberal democrat; Gardner is a moderately conservative Republican representative.
Hickenlooper is the democrat Governor, governing over the ultra liberal democrat legislature that has done things like pass the most absurd gun control laws, election laws, and done things like pass energy policy that cripples Colorado’s rural population.
Beauprez for Governor or Gessler?
Beauprez isn’t running much stronger.
I don’t sense a magic candidate here. To be honest, maybe Jane Norton could be drafted. :-P
Thank you for taking the time to explain. Aloha
Is that some kind of running gag or do people really want to draft Norton?
I never understood what was so thoroughly objectionable about her when she ran for the Senate. She’d be in that seat today had she been the nominee. Of course, the CO GOP has put up more than a few duds as Senate candidates since 1980.
I was only semi-serious about her candidacy for Governor. I don’t know what Tancredo’s game was in luring Beauprez into the race unless it was to deliberately divide the field to give him the win. In hindsight, Beauprez would’ve been better off remaining in the 7th.
I would surmise that what was “wrong” with her is the same thing that’s “wrong” with Pat Roberts, she was running against the self-appointed “tea party candidate”.
Ayyway, the primary poll FWIW shows it’s now a close 3-way race, where as before, Tancredo was crushing Gessler.
Obviously, Jane Norton is far better than Gale Norton and in hindsight would have probably won while that idiot Buck lost. But my position at the time was that Norton was simply the lesser of two evils, and I don't think it's changed much. I would have held my nose for Norton to stop crappy "Tea Party" candidate Buck from winning. (like I just did in yesterday's gubernatorial candidate when we had to pick from 3 mediocre "not Rauner's" to try and stop Rauner from getting it)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.