[2ndDivisionVet]

The King and Queen of CPAC.

[Linda Frances]

Rand Paul is a Mcconnell lackey. It’s those little things that tell us who you are rand.

[chris37]

What’s CPAC?

Does CPAC get my vote?

Does Rand Paul get my vote?

I’m king of my vote.

[mrsmith]

A libertarian whose number one concern isn’t the national debt is a fool.

[mulligan]

Another loser.

[Cicero]

In the first place, CPAC is doubtfully conservative. Last time around, they came out in favor of gay marriage.

As for Rand Paul, Ron Paul always used to be very popular with CPAC—because he bused in hundreds of young followers, who were mostly there because he supported legalizing pot.

I imagine it’s the same crowd again.

[Responsibility2nd]

Rand Paul Is the King of CPAC

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Who wrote this article? Rand’s press agent?

Sheesh.

[SharpRightTurn]

Rand, I like you but your support for amnesty is a deal killer.

I stand with Ted.

[SoConPubbie]

So the guy that wants to pass his own Amnesty plan is the King of CPAC?

Don't think so Tim!

Here are the links, from last year, where Rand Paul clearly lays out his own Amnesty plan for 2 million illegals per year, based on a "Certification" from a Pro-Amnesty congress that the border is "secure". No Fence, No E-Verify, No punishments for ID Fraud, and all the other misdemeanors and felonies committed by the Undocumented Democrats he wants to pardon.

Sen. Rand Paul: Trust but verify on immigration reform (Feburary 8th, 2013)

Rand Paul’s “Undocumented Citizens” Path to Legality (and Citizenship) (March 20, 2013)

Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform (March 19, 2013 Article)

Rand Paul's presence-and-jobs amnesty -- WITHOUT E-Verify


No, America Does Not Have “De Facto Amnesty”

GOP's Rand Paul, Dems' Luis Gutierrez in step on immigration reform

Rand Paul: Pathway To Citizenship Is Needed, E-Verify Is Not

Rand Paul On Illegals: Trust But Verify

Steve Deace – Et Tu, Rand Paul?

Paul: Republican Party in Need of Facelift

[firebrand]

The most important aspect of this speech: RAND PAUL SPOKE LOUD AND CLEAR ABOUT DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL.

When when when will Americans wake up to this travesty? Maybe now, but I see the article doesn’t even mention it. Everyone has always been more interested in the NSA spying issue. It’s important too, but the detention issue has been ignored.

Don’t let the brouhaha over the candidate or the speech obscure this issue. Bravo, Senator Paul. God bless you.

[Shery]

I hope it doesn’t come down to having to vote for him for president. We will all realize quite quickly that he is not all he pretends to be. That is all I will say on this for now, but I am quite hacked at his tricks.

[Cyber Liberty]

So sez “National Journal?” Pardon me while I roll my eyes to the next county....

[TomGuy]

CPAC seems to be like the Iowa caucuses — recent winners don’t seem to get very far in the primaries.

They both seem like a lot of media whoopla that ends up being rather meaningless when the actual primary season gets going.

[ncpatriot]

I’m tired of putting Senators up for president. When I was young I loved and voted for Reagan...even campaigned for him. I remember how passionate and hopeful he was. He believed in America. It was morning in America.
I think the youth of today would go for Perry.

[Fledermaus]

"I don't question President Obama's motives," Paul added,

I do Rand. And why can't you guys in DC also? Reagan would!

[BAW]

So who the hell let Little Mitchie McConnell in the CPAC door?

[Girlene]

He wants us to be lovers of liberty. Who can argue with that? At a time when our Constitution is under attack, this speech is spot on.

[Norm Lenhart]

Just amazing. Paul sides fully with the GOP’s Mitch the TEA Crusher McColnell, backs amnnesty, PRAISES OBAMA and not only are we seeing people freely make excuses, but suggesting that Perry, Mr no fence/vaccinator himself is an alternative.

Why are we screwed? I cannot imagine.

[GeronL]

Paul might rule fudge-PAC

[RKBA Democrat]

It’s way too early to pick the leading candidate in 2016. About 2 years too early.

We’ll see who emerges from the fray. I doubt that my first preference (Sarah Palin) will decide to run, so it’s up to the other candidates to demonstrate their bonafides and why they merit conservatives showing up.