Skip to comments.
Federal Judge Upholds State's Tough Assault Weapons Ban (CT's Whole Anti 2nd Law Upheld)
courant.com ^
| January 30, 2014
| EDMUND H. MAHONY
Posted on 01/30/2014 6:14:50 PM PST by raybbr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: Neil E. Wright
Only 4% sheep, sounds good.
61
posted on
01/31/2014 6:56:53 AM PST
by
Eagles6
(Valley Forge Redux)
To: raybbr
62
posted on
01/31/2014 7:08:10 AM PST
by
Faith65
(Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
To: JRandomFreeper
I'm armed. I won't be abused. I was speaking collectively Johnny. Individuals experience may vary.
63
posted on
01/31/2014 10:38:57 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
To: raybbr
so much for “strict scrutiny”, this judge ruled based on ANY interest of the government.
64
posted on
01/31/2014 10:42:21 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: deks
too much law school not enough reality.
65
posted on
01/31/2014 10:43:49 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: raybbr
The “judge” has castrated the 2nd Amendment.
To: ClayinVA
the same judge will tell us that homosexuals have a right to marry .
All we have is courts stacked with liberal activist judges
67
posted on
01/31/2014 3:53:57 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: raybbr
Robed judicial activist tyrant just invented a pile of horse manure, ignoring Heller decision, writing up nonsense that doesn’t deserve anything but ignoring.
68
posted on
01/31/2014 6:41:55 PM PST
by
TheBigJ
To: deks
Thanks for the clarification. I’ve subscribed to the blog.
69
posted on
02/01/2014 5:57:54 AM PST
by
Postman
(Flies get too litle credit. They know!!!)
To: All
Today CCDL and the other litigants in Shew v Malloy filed a notice to appeal yesterdays decision.
Click for website (see links to other resources on left side). . .
Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc.
70
posted on
02/01/2014 10:10:21 AM PST
by
deks
To: raybbr
“In defending the ban, Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen argued that handguns and rifles on the state’s list of banned assault weapons were designed for killing people and should not be generally owned and used.”
71
posted on
02/09/2014 10:16:24 PM PST
by
mom.mom
To: All
For some reason the link at #44 removed the picture.
U.S. District Judge Alfred Covello
72
posted on
03/10/2014 1:45:44 PM PDT
by
deks
To: raybbr; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; Travis McGee; ...
"the government's interest in reducing gun violence." ...against jack booted thugs and their masters.
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
73
posted on
03/10/2014 2:48:19 PM PDT
by
null and void
( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
To: kvanbrunt2
I believe this stupid judge may have actually acted in the “government’s interest in INCREASING gun violence.” May the blood of all be on his hands.
To: null and void
75
posted on
03/10/2014 3:43:36 PM PDT
by
OwenKellogg
(Fundamental transformation leads to Crimea.)
To: OwenKellogg
76
posted on
03/10/2014 3:51:27 PM PDT
by
null and void
( Obama is Law-Less because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!)
To: OwenKellogg
Notg Uilty.
I think it’s a Ukrainian name.
77
posted on
03/10/2014 4:50:34 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: raybbr
calling it a constitutionally valid means of balancing gun rights and the government's interest in reducing gun violence.UFB!!
Steam emanating from ears......
78
posted on
03/10/2014 5:19:53 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
To: Tzimisce
If you don’t mind, Padre, I’m gonna borrow that!
79
posted on
03/10/2014 5:22:39 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
To: raybbr
"While the act burdens the plaintiffs' Second Amendment rights..."Just wow. Doesn't that mean the act is unconstitutional right there?
This is a judge speaking?
80
posted on
03/10/2014 5:56:32 PM PDT
by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson