Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Implementing ObamaCare: Price tag higher than earlier estimates (CGI Alone 290 million)
Washington Post ^ | 24 Oct 13, 1159 am | Juliet Epstein

Posted on 10/24/2013 10:05:34 AM PDT by xzins

Edited on 10/24/2013 10:06:38 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

But under questioning Thursday, Campbell said her company, CGI

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fiasco; healthgov; obamacare; website
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: xzins

I’m not a developer by any means, but I do a lot of administrative scripting. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to re-work somebody else’s scripts that tested fine using a trivial test set and spun up and froze when confronted with actual production data.


21 posted on 10/24/2013 10:35:47 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

some one of the reps ,,at the end of the House Hearing this morning asked why no on had Apologized......for this utter fiasco.

no one had a reasonable answer.

one of the “lets not politicize this” chumps had to chime in that no one who “shutdown”....the government had yet apologized for being so mean to obama....and obamacare..

the facts are on the table and America isnt THAT stupid....

The republicans didnt write the stinking thing and that wont be overlooked when the chit really hits the fan.


22 posted on 10/24/2013 10:36:51 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( Un-Documented Journalist / Block Captain..Tyranny Response Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Everybody test markets new products.

You’d think test marketing new software would involve trying to overload it with customers.

And you think you’d discover at that point that it wouldn’t take even ONE customer.


23 posted on 10/24/2013 10:38:37 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins

right!

or say they needed 5 years of development and 2 years of testing.


24 posted on 10/24/2013 10:42:53 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford must be dying of envy.


25 posted on 10/24/2013 10:45:00 AM PDT by Gator113 ( Cruz, Palin and Lee speak for me, most everyone else is just noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Accounts I've read are that they did load test it and it failed to handle even a few hundred concurrent connections, but the went ahead with it anyway beacuse they didn't have a choice.

It's almost like the thought it would work in production because the computers wouldn't dare dissappoint The One.

26 posted on 10/24/2013 10:45:05 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Lucianne

27 posted on 10/24/2013 11:00:13 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


28 posted on 10/24/2013 11:05:46 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins

But this CGI, for a $22k campaign donation, got a $290 million no-bid contract.

Not a bad ROI.


29 posted on 10/24/2013 11:07:30 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Not a bad ROI

I need some investment tips like that.

I've seen firms advertise on the web that they'll do advanced software from scratch for your business with applications for customers, inventory, you name it, and be talking in the neighborhood of 300 grand.

The scandal is that's the way government works. This company had someone stuff their pockets with about 289 million dollars profit at a cost of 290 million dollars.

That is fraud.

And it's the reason government costs so much. It's not a new idea. It's as old as county commissioners having Uncle Zeke's Blacktop Company pave roads at a double or triple the cost bid because of "quality". Everybody shares in splitting up the overpayment.

30 posted on 10/24/2013 12:08:31 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This is like Solyndra, huge payouts for naught

was this even a contract that got bidded on?


31 posted on 10/24/2013 12:32:07 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I’ve read that it was a no-bid contract, but the only reason the military could ever do a no-bid was if there was only a sole provider.

I’m betting there are hundreds of software firms in the country.


32 posted on 10/24/2013 2:24:01 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I have seen Priceline and Travelocity, why couldn’t they just do something like that? Find the company/policy you want and then click through to secure servers to sign up?

Wouldn’t that have been so much simpler?


33 posted on 10/24/2013 2:32:02 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

There is nothing more complicated in what they wanted to do than Priceline and Travelocity. They could have bought their software and adapted it. And I bet for a whole lot less money....about 280 million less.

And my personal info is secure on those sites.


34 posted on 10/24/2013 2:35:04 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yep.

Like has been said, this was supposed to fail. All that money went to slush funds probably.


35 posted on 10/24/2013 2:42:39 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Like has been said, this was supposed to fail.

This is such an obvious huge failure that embarrasses the democrat brand that you've got to wonder if the Obama cronies aren't really this stupid. It's hard to believe they're that stupid, but it is a possibility.

If they intentionally wanted it to fail, then you've got to wonder why.

36 posted on 10/24/2013 2:49:32 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So they can push for single payer, it’s not exactly a secret that they want it


37 posted on 10/24/2013 2:53:59 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Single payer will never get past the House of Representatives. And it shouldn’t get past a Senate in which we have 46 Senators supposedly opposed to it.

The rats would have to win 60 seats in the Senate and take over the House in 2014 to turn this into single payer.


38 posted on 10/24/2013 2:56:18 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Single payer will never get past the House of Representatives

Wait until the GOPe passes amnesty and conservatives stay home in 2014.

39 posted on 10/24/2013 3:05:37 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"You’d think test marketing new software would involve trying to overload it with customers."

For about 10 years I was an Online gaming beta tester (Tested everything from Everquest to Warcraft.)

One of the main tests I was part of in every game was stress testing the servers including the login server.

There is noway this bunch of clowns actually did a valid stress test and gave this turd the go ahead to go live.

40 posted on 10/24/2013 3:05:49 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson