I think with your last post you have elevated sheer, absolute, black-is-white-and-white-is-black birther denialism to a brand new art form.
You said:
Dane never said Jefferson would BE a French citizen, he said he could live AS A French citizen.
A person could live AS A monkey, Jeff. That person could swing from a tree AS A monkey does, eat fruit, berries and bugs AS A monkey does and sleep in a crook of a tree AS A monkey does
but that does not MAKE that person a monkey!
Except that Nathan Dane said, quite explicitly, IN THE EXACT SAME SENTENCE THAT YOU TWIST AND MISQUOTE, that Thomas Jefferson had already BEEN MADE A FRENCH CITIZEN:
"So Mr. Jefferson was naturalized in France and there made a French citizen, and had he gone there would have been entitled to all the rights there of an adopted citizen..."
You have indeed raised birther denialism to a new level.
Blah! Blah, blah, blah ba blah, blah, blah!
-----
Answer the question, Jeff:
Where, EXACTLY, in Nathan Dane's work is found the phrase "dual citizen"?