Blah! Blah, blah, blah ba blah, blah, blah!
-----
Answer the question, Jeff:
Where, EXACTLY, in Nathan Dane's work is found the phrase "dual citizen"?
Ah. And now you’re engaging in the time-honored birther tradition of MOVING THE GOAL POSTS.
You’re the one who made the stupid and false assertion that Dane never said Thomas Jefferson was really a citizen of France. I showed clearly and absolutely that he did.
Okay, so having been caught in a delusion the scale of Mount Everest, you now try to squirm out of it by claiming that if Dane didn’t use the words “dual citizen,” that somehow justifies your idiocy.
Afraid not. Dane clearly stated that Jefferson had been naturalized by the French and thereby made a citizen of France. He further emphasized the real nature of that citizenship by noting that if Jefferson went to France, he would enjoy all the privileges there of an adopted (that is, naturalized citizen. Why? Because he WAS a naturalized citizen.)
Well, as far as dual citizenship goes, if Jefferson was a citizen of the United States, and simultaneously a naturalized citizen of France, what does that make him? It makes him a dual citizen, whether Dane used those specific words or not.