Richard Dawkins Branded "Racist" Over Anti-Muslim Remarks

Arutz Sheva ^ | 9/8/13 | Ari Soffer

[Monkey Face]

They will never make any more Nobel-worthy contributions because they are focused on eliminating the Infidel. Anyone who doesn’t understand that should be forced to view an execution of an “Infidel” in a Muslim country. The late Igor was rounded up from the Souk in Al Taif, Saudi Arabia, in 1977, and forced by two menacing “policemen” to witness such an event. I have it in his own words.

He was shaken.

Such intense paranoia cannot be reasoned with or tempered with education, since most Muslim men are taught from the cradle that the Infidel is the “enemy.”

And because they sacrifice so many sons so needlessly, the women are constantly pregnant, and giving birth to sons to replace the sons, fathers, brothers and husbands that have been so needlessly killed. For what?

The Lord is coming, and He is NOT happy!

[pabianice]

It is interesting to note that, for their number, Jews are several hundred times more accomplished that any other group. And that Muslims are the least accomplished.

[LibWhacker]

"...it is technically true that fewer Muslims (10) than Trinity College Cambridge members (32) have won Nobel prizes," the comparison was not a fair one since you could "insert pretty much any other group of people instead of ‘Muslims’, and the statement would be true. You are comparing a specialized academic institution to an arbitrarily chosen group of people."

You're right. It's not fair -- to Trinity College. Dawkins was actually comparing a few tens of thousands of Trinity graduates to over two billion muslims. And that's grossly unfair.

Or maybe she wants us to compare apples to apples; namely, to compare "a specialized academic institution," Trinity, to a specialized academic muslim institution... Oh, wait... There isn't one worthy of that designation. In all of 1400 years of islimic history!

The only point on which Dawkins was wrong was his implication that muslims accomplished something admirable during the Middle Ages. Those stories originate from islamic historians who were tasked with putting lipstick on a pig, and such is absolutely hideous on Mohammad and his followers.

[Gamecock]

Islam is a race?

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks p and mk.

[JimSEA]

Dawkins’ confrontational, evangelical atheism rubs me the wrong way. He wastes time and earns money by engaging in polemics, not science.

However, you have to be a skeptic of some degree to accomplish anything as a scientist. Muslims aren’t real big on skeptics.

[Larry Lucido]

LOL!!

[ZULU]

He’s not racist. He right. Muslims are murdering swine. Islam is not s religion its a death cult

[GeronL]

he is an anti-reigion zealot

The leftists loved him while he has been bashing Christians and Jews. Now they freak out because he included Muslims.