1. Do we have explosives chemical residue from any of the wreckage consistent with a bomb going off? Both C4 and Semtex plastique explosives leave behind a distinctive chemical residue after the explosion.
2. Do we have any warhead fragmentation pattern consistent with the explosion of the warhead from a MANPAD portable surface-to-air missile?
If these clues are not found, that rules out an act of terrorism in the loss of Flight 800.
Yes, there was residue found in the wreckage. The ‘official story’ at the time was that flight 800 just so HAPPENED to have been used to train bomb sniffing dogs just prior to the flight.
Yes. Really.
2. Do we have any warhead fragmentation pattern consistent with the explosion of the warhead from a MANPAD portable surface-to-air missile?
I know a guy who knows a guy who was an FAA crash investigator on this event. He obviously was in legal jeopardy for speaking at all but ‘intimated’ that it wasn’t a fuel tank explosion.
Yes, but not of those particular explosives. We had a chemical residue trail analyspzed as rocket fuel residue on the backs of specific seats. . And yes, strange round shrapnel recovered from multiple bodies that is a signature of certain anti-aircraft missiles. . But they were covered up. There was overwhelming evidence that a missile struck that plane. The math did not permit the time required for the "zoom climb" scenarios of either the CIA or the NTSB cartoons. (see Swordmaker's detailed timelines — do a search of FR for it) The only scenario that fits with the location of the debris fields (including the anomalous debris field 90° away from the vector of flight) is the strike of a missile and a ballistic fall without power of both the nose and main body of the plane . . . and the debris ejected by the missile transecting the plane and carrying parts with it that landed in the anomalous 90° field. Ten there is the Mach to radar track that intersected the plane . . .
Yes, both c4 and semtex residue were found in the fuselage. It is documented in the final NTSB report. They conclude they were brought aboard by bomb sniffing dogs prior to the flight. This has been debunked. This new documentary should cover this hopefully.