Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bigoted, Religious [Zealots]‘: High School Senior Allegedly Expelled, Charged With Felonies Over Gay
The Blaze.com ^ | May. 20, 2013 | Billy Hallowell

Posted on 05/20/2013 11:05:57 AM PDT by Houmatt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-346 next last
To: manc
Why does the article have to make this about being homosexual , when it clearly is about a minor having sex and being molested.

Because her mother made it an issue by a)bringing it up, b)saying Kaitlyn should be free and c)referring to the younger girl's parents as "bigoted, religious zealots."

See, in the eyes of this pathetic failure of a parent, her daughter didn't do anything wrong. It is all the fault of the other girl's parents because they are homophobic.

21 posted on 05/20/2013 11:23:44 AM PDT by Houmatt (Generic tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: manc

According to the article, the relationship started when both girls were minors.


22 posted on 05/20/2013 11:23:54 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

They would if sex was involved, and the boy was above the legal age of consent.


23 posted on 05/20/2013 11:25:17 AM PDT by Houmatt (Generic tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

The girls was 17 when this started. The parents did nothing until she turned 18. I would bet if the daughter was doing the 18 year old football quarterback, the parents wouldn’t have made a peep.


24 posted on 05/20/2013 11:27:33 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

Are you sure? That doesn’t seem right. The phrase “Romeo & Juliet” usually crops up...


25 posted on 05/20/2013 11:28:42 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

As ridiculous as this will sound, by the logic postulated by the obvious pro-gay folks in the article...SOME of the cases of sex by Catholic Priest’s should be ignored...after all it was love or consensual but gay.

Like I said RIDICULOUS...Every one of those sicko priests should pay dearly, but clearly here the pro gay lifestyle folks want a dismissal of a violation of law because of the GAY element when its not even a part of the charge. This is Statutory RAPE folks....I have no pity and every fool who “signes their emoting petition” is simply being used to usurp the law...NOT uphold it...just to help the gay agenda.


26 posted on 05/20/2013 11:29:23 AM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
They’re only 3 years apart. I don’t think we’d expect all hell to break loose if a boy was dating a girl 3 years younger.

True, though all hell can break loose in situations like this where the minor's parent's don't approve of the relationship for whatever reason. That seems to be the case here - the article implies that the minor's parents disapproved because it was a homosexual relationship (that may or may not actually be the case), but regardless of their reason, it looks like the only reason the school and authorities became involved is because the minor's parents complained.

27 posted on 05/20/2013 11:29:45 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

No way! Seniors date Sophmores alot, mostly the ones that have a reputation as being kinda slutty.


28 posted on 05/20/2013 11:29:45 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

Yeah and it happened to Marcus Dixon because he was black, now it happens because she’s gay. Maybe the thing the two have in common—they broke the law.

It happens to straight white folk, too. It’s the law and watch the law change...then what happens?


29 posted on 05/20/2013 11:30:00 AM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
They’re only 3 years apart. I don’t think we’d expect all hell to break loose if a boy was dating a girl 3 years younger.

If a man over age 18 (even days over that age) was having sex with my 15 y/o daughter? I imagine the loser or his next of kin could give lessons on the meaning of "all hell breaking loose" after that mistake! Going the legal route is quite gentle compared with what adults who prey on children under age 16 deserve.

30 posted on 05/20/2013 11:30:08 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

Kaitlyn Hunt... K Hunt... hmmm.


31 posted on 05/20/2013 11:31:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

And did you see where it mentioned they knew and didn’t get cops involved until after she turned 18? This is not protecting their kid it is about getting back at the other girl involved.


32 posted on 05/20/2013 11:31:47 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Kaitlyn Hunt... K Hunt... hmmm.

She's looking for her missing brother, Mike.

33 posted on 05/20/2013 11:32:19 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt; All

So just curious, the definition of statutory rape is: “The criminal offense of statutory rape is committed when an adult sexually penetrates a person who, under the law, is incapable of consenting to sex. Minors and physically and mentally incapacitated persons are deemed incapable of consenting to sex under rape statutes in all states. These persons are considered deserving of special protection because they are especially vulnerable due to their youth or condition.

So since I don’t know what this 18 year old girls “situation” is, I would assume she isn’t equipped with the equipment to “sexually penetrate” and therefore not capable of “sealing the deal.”

Thank God I’m not a lawyer, and if I were the underage girl’s father I would still be mad as hell. But this may not go anywhere.


34 posted on 05/20/2013 11:32:51 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

But they did nothing until she turned 18. The relationship started when she was 17.


35 posted on 05/20/2013 11:33:51 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

Isnt therean exception to those child protection laws for those who identity themselves as LBGT?

Well there should be..... it was just love(her mom claims) .... that is what LGBT is all about ...love....love is a conservative principle.....Obama’s conservative principle as he ‘evolved’


36 posted on 05/20/2013 11:34:45 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I am sure you sound to me like you are trying to rationalize a criminal act.

Read this very carefully: Sexual behavior between two people, if one of them is below the legal age consent, is a crime. In every state of the union, including Florida. Being a lesbian doesn't provide an exception.

If there is any part of that you cannot understand, then please delete your pro-pedophile account and go away.

Thank you.

37 posted on 05/20/2013 11:34:47 AM PDT by Houmatt (Generic tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

LOL Are you being facetious?


38 posted on 05/20/2013 11:35:23 AM PDT by Houmatt (Generic tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

It matters because the majority of lesbians and homosexuals admit to an interest in the 13-16 set. That’s called pederasty.

If you call them pedophiles they can deflect the argument by calling it hyperbole - which it is - therefore it’s important to get the terminolgy correct in order to prevent giving these degenerates a way to deflect the argument.


39 posted on 05/20/2013 11:35:55 AM PDT by MeganC (You can take my gun when you can grab it with your cold, dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

A person can be raped with the use of an object. Penetration does not require a body part.


40 posted on 05/20/2013 11:37:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson