So just curious, the definition of statutory rape is: “The criminal offense of statutory rape is committed when an adult sexually penetrates a person who, under the law, is incapable of consenting to sex. Minors and physically and mentally incapacitated persons are deemed incapable of consenting to sex under rape statutes in all states. These persons are considered deserving of special protection because they are especially vulnerable due to their youth or condition.
So since I don’t know what this 18 year old girls “situation” is, I would assume she isn’t equipped with the equipment to “sexually penetrate” and therefore not capable of “sealing the deal.”
Thank God I’m not a lawyer, and if I were the underage girl’s father I would still be mad as hell. But this may not go anywhere.
A person can be raped with the use of an object. Penetration does not require a body part.
I am not a lawyer either, but even Stevie Wonder can see this.
You can "sexually penetrate" a person in many ways - fingers, inanimate objects, etc. One does not require a working penis to "seal the deal" in this case.
“I would assume she isn’t equipped with the equipment to “sexually penetrate” and therefore not capable of “sealing the deal.””
Had a gay girl tell me, “Silly! That’s what fingers are for!”