So how’d he shoot himself in the throat?
I guess they were not taking any chances. But, I notice how the story keeps changing.
Maybe that's why the Dept. of Homeland Security has been buying millions of rounds of ammunition. Their plan for enhancing security involves shooting hundreds of rounds at unarmed people -- but never actually hitting anyone.
So much for the throat wound being self-inflicted.
I figured he didn’t, otherwise he would have shot the homeowner.
So did they recover any guns from his dead brother? I’ve been wondering about this all along. You can bet they didn’t get an assault rifle. That would have been the headline.
The way I’m getting it they killed the cop to steal his gun for Baby Bomber because he didn’t have one, but couldn’t figure how to unlock his holster. Got to wonder about the claims of several pistols and a rifle.
This e,plains why the boat-owner was not killed when he looked inside the tarp over the boat.
That would explain how the homeowner was able to peek under the tarp and survive to make the phone call...
Names. We want the names of these "officials" on the public record. Otherwise anything said is just a bunch of back stabbing hearsay.
Now we are getting stories that the younger bomber was unarmed but shot to heck when he was captured. Government officials tell us that the older brother had a “9mm semi-automatic weapon” when he was killed. I wonder.
I am starting to doubt most, if not all that I am hearing.
.....”the suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings had no firearms when he came under a barrage of police gunfire that struck the boat where he was hiding”......
...the victims on the street of Boston didn’t have any firearms on them either...when they came under a barrage of fire, flying “bullits” and smoke from this beast.. and they had no clue it was coming!
This “thing” that’s building of protecting this terrorist murderer is going to get fully out of hand.
Has anyone noticed that there seems to be a news blackout on the firearms used by the bombers.
Normally the police would have an immediate photo op for the press and call for new gun control laws. One would think they would be demanding the SENATE re vote on the AW ban.
So why the blackout? Even some web sites are wondering why we haven’t seen the firearms.
When were the infrared photos taken and who took them?
Ask anyone in Boston who spent the day holding on to a baseball bat, they were assured that gun laws work.
Better to live one day as a lion than to be eaten by one.
Sorry Benito, stole and altered your quote.
Bump.
Hmmmmm....ping!
We need to get a ping list going..too much info and different stories coming out. A what about the story that they cops were fired on and did not return fire? The Boston PD chief said that on Fox News in a presser shortly after white hat bomber was taken into custody.
wTH??
Keep changing the story enough and common people find they can’t discuss even the basic facts.
Move along...nothing to see here...
Do you think law enforcement wanted it to come out immediately that they declared martial law and ordered people out of their homes at gun point for an unarmed.
Just when you thought this mess couldn’t get worse, now you can cast aside any faith in law enforce. If boot lickers here don’t like that comment you know where you can go.