Give credit where credit is due. Bloomberg got something right! Planned Parenthood's angle escapes me.
1 posted on
03/13/2013 8:33:23 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Yep that is true. He did get it right on this issue. But the media won't see it that way. This statement {not even a law} rather than his acts of tyranny {Unconstitutional laws} will be attacked with a vengeance.
2 posted on
03/13/2013 8:43:15 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
(Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
To: neverdem
“Planned Parenthood of New York put out a press release blasting the ads for “stigmatizing” teen parents.”
Duh! That’s the point! Funny how illegitimacy rates were low back when they were stigmatized.
Not that PP cares about their feelings. Less teen parents means less panicked trips to get abortions, and less money for them.
3 posted on
03/13/2013 8:45:06 PM PDT by
Shadow44
To: neverdem
The intelligentsia gets all worked up over self-righteous signs published for themselves and an imaginary audience, while teens everywhere are too stupid to read those signs due to the intelligentsia’s inability to recognize what constitutes a solid family, solid education, and a resultant civil society.
4 posted on
03/13/2013 8:47:25 PM PDT by
Fester Chugabrew
(double trouble, here we come)
To: neverdem
what did he do right?
These posters are not pro-abstinance
To stop teen pregnancy, stay away from poverty they say
5 posted on
03/13/2013 8:49:20 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: neverdem
Everything Bloomie touches turns to crap.
But that’s what you get when the king wants to micromanage every aspect of the peasants’ lives.
6 posted on
03/13/2013 8:50:17 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: neverdem
Where in the brief description does it say that Nanny Bloomberg opposes teen ABORTION? He only wants them not to deliver the baby. No stats on what happens to teenagers who abort their children (drugs, psychological problems, STDs, etc).
To: neverdem
A good first step would be to stop providing financial incentives to unwed mothers.
15 posted on
03/14/2013 4:05:18 AM PDT by
GP100
To: neverdem
[Bloomberg got something right!]
...right after he got ruled against on his soda war...now he has to get his (r)epublican mojo back.
16 posted on
03/14/2013 4:58:09 AM PDT by
RetSignman
("...a Republic if you can keep it")
To: neverdem
Finally. Something I can get behind him on. Of course, the race baiters and government parasites won’t see it that way.
18 posted on
03/14/2013 5:44:39 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: neverdem
‘Hurting and shaming communities is not what’s going to bring teen pregnancy rates down,’ she added.”
But abortions will - right Haydee from Planned Parenthood?
These people are scum.
19 posted on
03/14/2013 5:55:54 AM PDT by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: neverdem
You subsidize something, you get more of it. You also get the skimmers who rake off a little for themselves in the process of the wealth transfer.
Poverty pimps is an apt names for the skimmers.
21 posted on
03/14/2013 6:50:15 AM PDT by
randita
To: neverdem
24 posted on
03/16/2013 7:23:17 AM PDT by
dervish
(either the vote was corrupt or the electorate is)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson