Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Think about it: If the desire for sexual congress with children is just “another orientation”–an odious comparison, in my view–and if some children supposedly ”like it” when they voluntarily engage in sex with adults–and indeed, if it doesn’t actually hurt them–how long would the absolute rejection of cross-generation congress last? Not very. It wouldn’t be long until we saw the absolute prohibition on pedophilic sex downgraded to a mere “taboo,” which, as the last fifty years teach us, are made to be broken. NAMBLA members must be grinning ear-to-ear

Between this, the idea that a child has the right to do what she wants with her body (at least in abortion and birth control cases) and the "politically correct" prohibition on judging other cultures (including, the military's ban on criticizing pedophilia in Muslim countries) I would guess that "pedophile rights" will be enshrined at part of U.S. jurisprudence in twenty years, tops.

1 posted on 01/05/2013 2:00:55 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I would guess that "pedophile rights" will be enshrined as part of U.S. jurisprudence in twenty years, tops.

Once we accept that children, including pre-pubescent children, can legitimately engage in sexual acts ... and we have accepted this, because our age-of-consent laws are relative, not absolute ... there are no logical limits for restraint.

2 posted on 01/05/2013 2:15:26 PM PST by Tax-chick (The paint is in the basket with the skulls in there. Don't tell me you can't find it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Interesting the left is now admitting what we have been saying all along: being gay is the same as being a pedophile: deviant sexual “urges.”


3 posted on 01/05/2013 2:16:02 PM PST by freedumb2003 (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The day after 9-11-2001, I stood in a courtroom giving a victim impact to the judge against a man who had ingratiated himself into our church youth group and ended up being charged with 123 counts of sex offenses against minors (all boys). The pervert pled out and went to jail. He eventually reoffended and will again plead out this Monday. Please pray that the judge throws the book at him for this second offense and for violating his probation. I hope he dies by someone’s hand in prison.


4 posted on 01/05/2013 2:16:14 PM PST by patriotsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Good God.... From that link you posted...... Quoting....

The handbook says troops should avoid “making derogatory comments about the Taliban, advocating women’s rights, any criticism of pedophilia, directing any criticism towards Afghans, mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct” or “anything related to Islam.”

If we will discipline solidiers for merely speaking out about womens rights and in opposition to pedophilia then we can rest assured that we won't be defending those people from the assaults. And if we won't be defending young children from that sort of treatment, we are by definition evil.

It is possible for the US and the objectives of our armed forces to go from "forces of good" to being "forces of evil". Not saying we've done that yet, but if we go much farther we darn sure will have.

Discipling people for daring to verbally speak against pedophilia much less bayoneting the bastards they saw doing it. This is the sign of an organization that needs to correct its course quickly.

As to not speaking ill of the Taliban.... didn't we send the lads over there to blow them to smithereens ?
8 posted on 01/05/2013 2:25:15 PM PST by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Paedophiles may be wired differently.

So are serial killers, dictators, zoophiles, and a host of other highly undesirable sorts.

9 posted on 01/05/2013 2:38:22 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If we accept that Homosexuality is just another orientation we must also accept that pedophilia, bestiality, Necrophilia,and any other sexual preference is alson just another orientation.

When these idiot head shrinkers accepted Homosexuality as normal all of the other sick perversions became normal too. After all they are only preferences.

When you accept one sickness you have to accept the others.

I do not accpet any of them as normal they are a pack of mentally ill perverts, who are only interested in gathering more perverts to their sickness. The world today seems to be willing to accept anything if it has to do with sex.

First they must destrpy religion and those who do not believe as they do and they are well on their way to doing it.

Sodom and Gomorrah was nothing compared to what these perverts have in mind.


12 posted on 01/05/2013 2:45:57 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Pure, unadulterated, demented evil.


13 posted on 01/05/2013 2:48:51 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (we)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Slopes really are slippery!


16 posted on 01/05/2013 2:55:02 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Planned Parenthood and Marie Stopes International are already trying to put "Sexual Rights of Children" into international law.

Comment from Pedophile Action League. "Good idea. I love children."

18 posted on 01/05/2013 2:59:07 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (It must be said, "The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

These folks worked with the homo’s to normalize their perversion up until about 1978. The homo’s realized the pedophilia was hurting their cause and broke off.

There is an active movement to normalize pedophilia and they are using the same methods the homo’s used.

Now they are teaching kids as young as kindergarten to be promiscuous and engage in perversion and calling it sex ed.


19 posted on 01/05/2013 2:59:22 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Sexual stimulation of children is intrinsically harmful to them, and the so-called experts who say otherwise are lying. The phenomenon of hypersexuality is well known, or was well known, to the mental health professions many years ago. It is the generator of impulse-ridden sexual behavior among preteens and teens, which is seen daily in the more depraved and degenerate precincts of the country.
21 posted on 01/05/2013 3:02:41 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

To the deranged perverts this is simply a “P” to add to the GLBTP alliance. They have been obsessed with other people’s kids since Sodom was a kingdom.


26 posted on 01/05/2013 3:24:17 PM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The key for the promotion of sodomy is the lowering of the age of consent. Ths sodomites want those twelve year old pleasure boys.

As an aside the sodomites are not wise by claiming "they are wired" to be sodomites. If and when the healthy part of society wakes up the latter will be justified in concluding that the only way to effectively suppress the use of children for sexual gratification will be to kill the sodomites.

27 posted on 01/05/2013 3:29:18 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The key for the promotion of sodomy is the lowering of the age of consent. Ths sodomites want those twelve year old pleasure boys.

As an aside the sodomites are not wise by claiming "they are wired" to be sodomites. If and when the healthy part of society wakes up the latter will be justified in concluding that the only way to effectively supress the use of children for sexual gratification will be to kill the sodomites

28 posted on 01/05/2013 3:29:59 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

FWIW, I prosecuted hundreds of pedophile cases. It is rarely about the sex and is a definitive “mental illness”. Of the cases I prosecuted I’d say 90% were family members and about 90% were heterosexual. Again ... fwiw.


30 posted on 01/05/2013 3:36:53 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
We can help keep children safe, Goode argues, “by allowing paedophiles to be ordinary members of society, with moral standards like everyone else”, and by “respecting and valuing those paedophiles who choose self-restraint”. Only then will men tempted to abuse children “be able to be honest about their feelings, and perhaps find people around them who could support them and challenge their behaviour before children get harmed”.

Can't really argue with this, IMO.

It is perfectly obvious, at least to me, that someone is not inherently evil because of his desires or inclinations. We are seldom fully, if at all, in control of those.

He becomes evil because of his actions. Thus a man can be sexually attracted to children, but if he doesn't act on those desires he should not be considered evil. In fact, I think his self-restraint, in a society that denigrates such, should be considered admirable.

However, we won't get into what I consider appropriate treatment for those who molest kids. It would get me banned.

37 posted on 01/05/2013 4:18:30 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This is what I remembered like 20 years ago in Indiana. Some people in the state legislature wanted to pass a hate crimes law which included sexual orientation. At the time, one of my arguments against it was the slippery slope of it only applying to homosexuality today (1993) but how long before man/boy sex was going to be recognized as a sexual orientation. It would be at the point where I find a man sexually abusing a child and I beat the crap out of him and I get charged with a hate crime. Sounded far fetched then but not so much today.


39 posted on 01/05/2013 4:32:51 PM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Well, if you’re a dirty old man you can get a young girl pregnant - pay for an abortion - and voila! Free as a bird - to go on to the next little girl. Welcome to the new normal in America.


41 posted on 01/05/2013 4:46:28 PM PST by District13 (Obama scares me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I seem to remember one of Obama’s cabinet being a supporter of NAMBLA. Wasn’t it the Secretary of Education?


45 posted on 01/05/2013 5:27:09 PM PST by spaced
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I have no problem being judgmental. It is my judgment that convicted pedophiles should be executed in the public square with the execution shown live on TV.


51 posted on 01/05/2013 6:31:24 PM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson