Posted on 12/06/2012 10:49:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Why would the House waste it’s time with the Current Senate lineup?
This is the guy who said:
“I will side with the muslims in any conflict”.
Since it is not a religion, but a violent world-domination movement cleverly disguised as a religion, this man is a traitor.
>> And why would the NYT suddenly drop this little bombshell on their boy Barry?
If “suddenly” normally takes about a month or two, then you have a good question there.
Thanks for the info,....disturbing for sure....but no surprise.
I agree. What I meant to say is, interesting timing.
I know — just having fun at the expense of the NYT.
Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam And the American Left [Paperback]
David Horowitz (Author)
The bestselling "Unholy Alliance" is now in paperback! Former Leftist radical David Horowitz blows the lid off the dangerous liaison between U.S. liberals and Islamic radicals. With America's battle against the disastrous force of terrorism at hand, Horowitz takes us behind the curtain of the unholy alliance between liberals and the enemy - a force with malevolent intentions, and one that Americans can no longer ignore.....
Fast and Furious Middle East edition.
Impeach Obama and get Johnny Eisl...I mean, Joe Biden.
Yes: The only surprise is that the New York Times is printing the story.
Gives one some thought.
I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting if I were you.
al-Zawahiri is the "current leader of the militant Islamist organization al-Qaeda."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Zawahiri
So far, 0bambi has helped Al Qaeda's font, The Muslim Brotherhood take Egypt.
0bambi helped arm Al Qaeda in Libya (with the Qataris) to overthrow Ghaddafi. Who will win that state is currently being contested.
Finally, 0bambi is apparently arming Al Qaeda in Syria with arms from Libya, and Benghazi is a cover up of that operation.
So, in each country so far, Egypt, Libya, and Syria, 0bambi is on the side of Al Qaeda.
Interesting in light of the UN Arms Treaty that was almost pushed on us. So, the states trying to disarm their citizens are running small arms and perhaps more. Hmmmmm.....
Nothing to see here, Citizen. Move along.
Wow. In the New York Times. That means there’s misdirection going on. Notice how the Times article keeps referring to Qatar. It was Qatar that was bombing Libya. Oh, no, that was us.
I think this article shows that the Democrats are afraid that this is going to blow open on them. They’re trying to put out pre-emptive excuses.
Why did Obama and Hillary feel the need to overthrow the government in Libya? And isn’t it convenient that Gadaffi died. He can’t tell anybody if him and Soros were arguing about Gadaffi’s cut in those new Libyan oil fields.
The Middle East. Oil. Soros. Obama. Hillary.
Thank you. This is as close to “aid and comfort to the enemy” as it gets. Sadly, it will be a cold day in hell before a Republican in the Senate has the guts to let those words pass his lips.
Well, when you are dealing with a political party that has no ethics or morals, their only goal is tyrannical control, did you expect otherwise?
Yeah, he already told us whose side he was on. So why did retards elect him anyway?
The even bigger news:
“NY Times Publishes Article Vaguely Critical of Obama”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.