Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yldstrk; metmom; boatbums; caww

If you reject V2 then you fit into at least one. And by excluding any literal meaning of discipline by the “rod” then you reveal yourself to be a liberal who is conforming Scripture to your doctrine.

“Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell. “ (Proverbs 23:14)

“A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool’s back. “ (Proverbs 26:3)

And which again, physical spanking is a reluctant but sometimes necessary Biblical use, and teaches a fuller real consequence to defiant disobedience than passive measures, which also have their place.


66 posted on 11/17/2012 8:26:14 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212

suit yourself danny boy


69 posted on 11/17/2012 8:29:50 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

As best as I have been able to understand, V2 didn’t forbid Roman Catholics from continuing their extant practices. It opened up more options and more relaxed modes of religious practice. I’ve seen a lot of Catholics that think V2 opened up a bigger can of worms than it put to rest, and choose the older practices, but who are not in congregations that are dedicated to opposing it.


73 posted on 11/17/2012 8:36:00 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson