Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Gohmert: Did No One Else in Aurora Theater Have a Gun?
ABC/Yahoo ^ | 7/20/2012 | Chris Good

Posted on 07/21/2012 4:49:48 AM PDT by markomalley

The shooting could have been limited if someone else in the Aurora, Colo., movie theater had been carrying a gun, Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said today.

Gohmert reacted to the shooting, which left 12 dead, during an interview this morning on the radio program Ernest Istook Live! From The Heritage Foundation.

"Well it does make me wonder, you know with all those people in the theater, was there nobody that was carrying that could've stopped this guy more quickly?" Gohmert said. "I mean in Tyler, Texas, we had-my hometown-we had a shooter come in over a domestic matter, and just start shooting people. And it was a guy with a concealed carry-he got killed, but his shooting at this guy caused him to run and no doubt saved a lot of lives. He was a real hero."

Colorado allows residents to obtain concealed carry permits, according to the Colorado State Patrol website.

"I know that before we ever had concealed carry in Texas, there was a, just a senseless shooting years ago in Killeen, Texas, in a restaurant, and, you know, if we had had concealed carry permits at the time, there was a woman who had to leave her gun in her car, and if we'd had concealed carry the guy would've been stopped before he could've killed so many people," Gohmert said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: Colorado; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: msmnwo; propaganda; ratification; unguntreaty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: HarleyD

“Hollywood is the problem.”

AND these Hollywood executives know they are, too. They were in meetings yesterday with their heads together in some discussions of apparent conscience. - They used up Heath Ledger (the Joker) like they use anyone available for merchandise.


81 posted on 07/21/2012 8:45:11 AM PDT by Twinkie (Isaiah 53)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert

Having the weapon to fight doesn’t mean you have the will to fight lets use the internet cafe in Fla as an example. Two men come in with weapons to rob the patrons, one patron starts shooting and they start running never firing a shot. Whether to flee or whether to fight! You have to be in that situation before you’ll ever know.


82 posted on 07/21/2012 8:59:58 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
re: 100 round magazine -- not impossible. But most likely the reporters are uninformed.
83 posted on 07/21/2012 9:04:29 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Then maybe it’s time for survivors to start suing these places. If you won’t allow me to protect myself, then my safety is YOUR responsibility. YOUR policy placed my life at risk. Something along those lines... maybe it will at least get owners to think about their policy.

Personally, I don’t go places where I can’t carry, school and courthouse excluded.


84 posted on 07/21/2012 9:06:40 AM PDT by nodumbblonde ("The ladder of success is best climbed by stepping on the rungs of opportunity." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
"I believe the guy had on a lot of protective gear, tear gas and automatic weapons."

If you would be willing to put on a kevlar helmet, bullet proof vest and ballistic leggings and stand there while somebody blazed away at you, I'll let you stand by your opinion that it, "wouldn't have done much good."

Otherwise, I'm going to contend that even one shot in his direction would have, at a minimum, interrupted and distracted him. Several rounds on target, even if they didn't penetrate the kevlar, would have been like landing a couple of blows with a baseball bat.

85 posted on 07/21/2012 9:09:16 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert
If you were there with a gun, was it your duty to shoot the man?

Depends on your view of "Duty".

"Duty is a debt you owe to yourself to fulfill obligations you have assumed voluntarily." (Robert A. Heinlen)

Some of us would have felt a duty "to shoot the man", some would not.

86 posted on 07/21/2012 9:17:15 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
Head shots are pretty difficult in smoky environments

A miss would have got his attention, the wiz-crack would have taken his attention away from the slaughter.

87 posted on 07/21/2012 9:19:22 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente

When you make your donation let him know that our court system needs to send guys like this a message. When guilt is so patently obvious, give him an immediate trial, and then execute him - quickly as possibly.

The death penalty has no deterrent effect when it takes ten years or more to have final justice. By then the crime is no longer even remembered except by the victims.

I put a lot of blame on the court system for these recurring shootings - mass or otherwise on the streets. If justice is swift, it deters.

It may not stop every mentally disturbed guy, but something has to be done - especially when it is obvious for all to see who was the perpetrator. I can’t believe we have to say ‘alleged’ about this Holmes guy or the Hasan guy in the Fort Hood shootings.

I don’t even excuse mental disorders, and drunk drivers who kill should be sent to prison too. Death row should still be an option for these killers.


88 posted on 07/21/2012 9:20:00 AM PDT by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Chances are, though, it would have made him duck, regardless.”

Protective equipment serves to make taking a shot less lethal, it does not keep rounds from knocking you to your ass and taking your breath away. You take 4 or 5 rounds from a 45 into your ‘protected’ chest, you’ve knocked all momentum out of whatever the perp was intending.


89 posted on 07/21/2012 9:30:02 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
“Fish in a barrel” comes to mind.


90 posted on 07/21/2012 9:30:58 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

This SRM 1216 12 ga semi auto is fairly new to the market.

Throws a lot of lead down range very quickly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M29ewKBjCf8&feature=player_embedded

http://www.srmarms.com/


91 posted on 07/21/2012 9:32:11 AM PDT by davetex (Sick of moochers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
wouldn’t have done much good. I believe the guy had on a lot of protective gear, tear gas and automatic weapons.

He just had a vest, not body armor. A 9mm or higher to the chest will stop him long enough to fire additional head shots. If nothing else, a firing opponent would have slowed him down and allowed potential victims to escape.
Goehmert is 100% correct, but ABC News is trying to attack him because the White House ordered them to do so, because he dared to ask questions about Huma Abedin last week.

92 posted on 07/21/2012 9:33:19 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Think about the latest LED/green laser lights.

Your actions would be dictated by your location in relation to the shooter. That said, I have a Lasermax attached to my .380. I doubt I would turned it on in this situation. If you did, you would be giving up your biggest advantage for stopping the shooter, concealment.

If there was a distance, with only 7 .380 rounds, I'd expend one as quickly and as safely as possible at the shooter, to let him know that their was someone else in the theater with a weapon and gunning for him. If that didn't cause him pause and to run, I would still have the advantage of him not knowing my exact location and better able to try and take him down with the remaining six rounds. The longer he is distracted and trying to locate you, the more folks able to get out and better chance you have of help arriving.

If close, I'd commit to a surprise attack.

93 posted on 07/21/2012 9:36:06 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
I believe the guy had on a lot of protective gear, tear gas and automatic weapons.
No matter what protective gear that "cowardly-monster-James Holmes" hid within, it was

Cinemark theatre's CCW ban which resulted in it's patrons ultimate victimhood.

Another CCW patron present in that theatre would have given the targets of this "cowardly-monster-James Holmes" a fighting chance.

94 posted on 07/21/2012 9:38:00 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
Seriously??? That really is a comment I would expect from a liberal mind.

There's no need for personal insults. :O)

(MONITOR!! MONITOR!!)

I appreciate your comments-especially about the death penalty. That is something the needs to be brought back along with quick sentencing and executions.

95 posted on 07/21/2012 9:59:00 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stranger and pilgrim
The shooter did NOT have automatic weapons. He had semi-automatic weapons.

Thanks for the correction and information. I heard "automatic" weapons last night as the info was coming in.

96 posted on 07/21/2012 10:08:03 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
If you were there, had a gun and could have used it to end the rampage? Morally, yes, you had a duty to do so.

To be honest, if I had been in the theatre and had a handgun (and once I figured out the situation and realized what I would be up against), I think I would have stayed down with the goal of protecting myself and those who were with me - or maybe a "zone" of people if the guy started walking around and methodically executing. At that point - if he got closer - pop up and try to surprise him and unload into him.

Part of my logic would be that if I charged the guy and his AR-15 and got killed I wouldn't be able to protect anybody.

Just my thought while sitting safely at my computer.
97 posted on 07/21/2012 10:14:57 AM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Still, unless he’s downstage from you and visible, you have lots of innocent people upstage, in the path of fire. And the way big theaters are sloped for viewing, lots of people would probably be in your line of sight, so no shooting allowed.


98 posted on 07/21/2012 10:41:45 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“OK, so I guy walks into the theater carrying a gas mask, a Remington 870, an AR-15 and a sidearm and wearing protective gear.

How is it possible that nobody noticed this?

If he was carrying the stuff in a bag, it had to be a BIG bag.

So why didn’t anybody ask, “Hey, pal, what’s in the bag?””

Because he didn’t have all the stuff with him when he purchased the ticket. He went out the exit door, propped it open, to return with everything he used.


99 posted on 07/21/2012 10:51:45 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper ( For those who have had to fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected shall never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

The violence itself is not the problem since its a symptom of the real cause. The continuing quest by the left to remove all values and morals (the Judeo-Christian kind) from the public mind, see education, media including Hollywood but not limited, dependence on government for a handout since you don’t have to be responsible for yourself, the political class and its abhorrent behavior and corruption, and profound weakening in the belief in God. Of course those who do have morals in line with what is truly good and proper have also been affect since they have also been partially paralyzed with fear, and/or being shunned from the mainstream of society because of what I mentioned above which serves to enhance the damage as time goes on. The damage is slow and almost imperceptible at first over a generation or two, then it starts to pick up steam like it did in the 60’s and now we have a full fledged epidemic where the sick can no longer be ignored or covered up from the publics’ eyes and this has been going on for a while now.


100 posted on 07/21/2012 11:07:07 AM PDT by DarkWaters ("Deception is a state of mind --- and the mind of the state" --- James Jesus Angleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson