Skip to comments.CBS News: Roberts Was Going to Overturn ObamaCare But Changed His Mind
Posted on 07/01/2012 10:47:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
CBS News broke a huge story on Sunday's Face the Nation concerning the Supreme Court's Thursday ruling on ObamaCare.
According to Jan Crawford, CBS legal and political correspondent, Chief Justice John Roberts was initially going to strike down the individual mandate requiring citizens to buy health insurance, but changed his mind over the objections of the conservatives on the Court (video follows with transcript):
CBS News: Roberts Initially Wanted to Strike Down ObamaCare Mandate But Changed His Mind
NORAH ODONNELL, SUBSTITUTE HOST: We're going to start first with Jan because you've done some reporting. The big question was why did Chief Justice John Roberts do what he did? And you've learned some new details right?
JAN CRAWFORD, CBS LEGAL AND POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Well, that's right. What was striking about this decision was that it was the conservative Chief Justice that was providing that decisive fifth vote, joining the liberals to uphold the Presidents signature achievement. And Norah that was something that no one would have expected back in 2005 when President George W. Bush put him on the Supreme Court, and that was something that not even the conservative justices expected back in March when the Court heard arguments in this case.
I am told by two sources with specific knowledge of the Court's deliberations that Roberts initially sided with the conservatives in this case and was prepared to strike down the heart of this law, the so-called individual mandate, of course, that requires all Americans to buy insurance or pay a penalty. But Roberts, I'm told by my sources, changed his views deciding to instead join with the liberals.
And he withstood-- I'm told by my sources -- a month-long desperate campaign by the conservative justices to bring him back to the fold, and that campaign was led, ironically, by Justice Anthony Kennedy. And why that's ironic is because it was Justice Kennedy that conservatives feared would be the one most likely to defect. But their effort, of course, was unsuccessful. Roberts did not budge. The conservatives wrote that astonishing joint dissent united in opposition, and Roberts wrote the majority opinion with the four liberals to uphold the President's signature achievement.
ODONNELL: Has this there been anything like this on the Court before? I mean, that's extraordinary that the Chief Justice, according to your report about a month ago decided to do this and then was lobbied unsuccessfully.
CRAWFORD: Yes, that has happened before, and often in high-profile, controversial cases including Justice Kennedy who's changed his views in a very high-profile case involving a woman's rights on abortion back in 1992. And justices do change their mind. There is precedent for that. One justice told me that surprisingly enough it happens about once a term. But in the case of this magnitude with so much on the line, conservatives believed they had Roberts vote in this case, and there's quite a lot of anger within the hallways of the Supreme Court right now.
Those yelling for Roberts skin are no different then the mobs of yore.
Re read what I wrote when you calm down and regain some sense.
UH...The FBI is under the direction of ....Eric WIthHolder
or perhaps a girl friend!
From what I read on the other thread, it looks like boyfriend would be a more appropriate "perhaps".
Occam’s Razor....that’s it!
This was the phrase I was trying to dredge up over all the intellectual pundits’ many explanations for Roberts’ decision.
Dear Lord George Will and Charlie Krauthammer want to make him the pope!
What the hay? These guys do not speak for me. Their day is long passed, they are not anywhere near my wave length.
For Roberts simply did NOT do his job. His job, which I will write here in simple language for George Will, Krauthammer, et al....so that they get it.
A Supreme Court Justice’s job is to interpret all legislation when appealed as to whether it is in sync with our constitution.
It ain’t rocket science no matter how their august selves and Krauthammer would have you believe.
Read the constitution and is this law as being contested in compliance with it.
Roberts did not do this.
His job is NOT to re-write the law so that it’s more in compliance with the constitution. That is the job of our duly elected legislators.
His job is NOT to save the supreme court or its reputation.
His job is NOT to keep John Roberts in good with the cocktail circuit crowd.
If you or I don’t do our job we get fired.
Only we can’t fire Roberts.
Now what do we do?
The man did NOT take a stand and why should he? He can’t get fired and its not worth the bother of scorn.
So he just makes up his job duties and there you have it.
One silly, silly man afraid to take a stand. If a Supreme Court Justice don’t take a stand than who can?
“What’ll they do, have the Speaker cry all over him?”
That would do it for me!
Ah, but you forgot one thing that WILL happen if this OBamacare is not repealed.
See Romney is likely to be reaching across the aisles because while he’s all we got, we know he’s a liberal, we don’t much like him.
But he’s got four years and I predict as soon as he begins reaching across aisles and becomes a RINO, the Tea Party will be activated.
Four years will be plenty of time to form a cohesive third party, goodness we got started on it already but wisely stepped aside for our two party system to work.
We got Romney.
Still and so we’ll wait, we’ll see, Romney knows how to wave his finger to see where the wind wafts.
Come the elections of 2016 if Romney disappoints, there WILL be a third party.
Yes I know all the pitfalls of third parties but if the two parties you got are both the same, what we got to lose?
So while you’re right, the Republicans might likely do nothing about OBamacare...but I do think there will be major consequences.
Just a hunch.
And to think many were worried about Harriet Miers.
Roberts turned out to be worse - at least Harriet Miers (though unqualified) had principles!
The Supreme Court nas now joined the ranks of the 9th Circus Court.
That’s about as twisted a rationalization as the one Roberts used to rationalize his decision.
We're pissing away everything they fought for.
Do I have the answer?
No, I wish to God I did.
And I'm not taking it personally, it is a valid question
I don't know if I'd be willing, but I can honestly promise you that I would NOT take the appointment if I wasn't willing to do so.
Is that a fair answer?
So, to complete the thought, Roberts voluntarily took the appointment,so yes, I do not sympathize. He shouldnt be on the bench if hes not willing to stand up to Obamas thugs.
I would not criticize him if he said he couldn't take the appointment for fear of his family.
We might say that he “DEEMED” it a tax? Whole lot of deem-ons these days.
Probably longer odds
She bought me and a couple of other FReepers a drink. Anyway, she told us how she was in the hole for some debts, but she wanted to come to 9/12. She took a small amount of money to a casino (I think she lived in Nevada) and told herself that she would gamble that money and if it was fated she would win enough to pay the debt and get a last minute ticket to DC and 9/11. Well, she won $5K, paid the debt and hopped on a jet for DC. It was a pleasure to meet another patriot and hear her story.
So, I guess lady luck does intervene for a reason now and then. I wish I could remember the other FReepers I met there. I did meet Jim Robinson, a true patriot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.