Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

From another article:

She said that her late husband, Ronald Reagan, would have approved of a Romney presidency.

"Ronnie would have liked Gov. Romney's business background and his strong principles, and I have to say, I do, too," Mrs. Reagan said in the statement. "I believe Mitt Romney has the experience and leadership skills that our country so desperately needs, and I look forward to seeing him elected president in November."

WSJ: Nancy Reagan: 'Ronnie Would Have Liked' Romney

1 posted on 05/31/2012 9:56:57 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Romneys meet with Nancy Reagan, who offers endorsement

2 posted on 05/31/2012 10:01:06 PM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
"She said that her late husband, Ronald Reagan, would have approved of a Romney presidency."

No, he would not have.

3 posted on 05/31/2012 10:02:27 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

God Bless Mrs.Reagan,and I will take her word that her husband would have approved of Repuplicrat Romeny.

However I do not agree with the Reagan’s in this case.


14 posted on 05/31/2012 10:16:12 PM PDT by jazzo (Resistance is Futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

A Reagan quote that is very appropriate for today:

(from Oct 27, 1964)

“The Founding Fathers knew a government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. So we have come to a time for choosing.”[70] He also said, “You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man’s age-old dream - the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order - or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan#Early_political_career

Obama is taking us straight into totalitarianism and government control of individuals.

As Reagan said, today is also a “time for choosing”.


66 posted on 05/31/2012 11:15:57 PM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Everyone can breath a little easier now that we finally know who the 200 yr old Nancy Reagan will vote for.


67 posted on 05/31/2012 11:17:26 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Nancy is obviously a RINO sellout and is not a conservative...

Just so no one misses it this time, this is sarcasm

236 posted on 06/01/2012 5:17:30 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

God love her.
However, I doubt she did any Youtube searches of Willard? His liberal history. Not to mentioin the one where he says, IN HIS OWN WORDS, “i’m no Rondald Reagan”

I am hoping everything I have learned about his history is truly that..history?
Although, I havn’t seen much evidence of same.
Maybe Mrs Reagan can set me staight?


239 posted on 06/01/2012 5:29:34 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
"Nancy Reagan endorses Romney's bid for president"

Why didn't she endorse Willard BEFORE he was the nominee???What if she had endorsed Hussein or had even said "you have nothing to worry about with Obamao president"? Would you vote for him? Most of us see right through the charade.
240 posted on 06/01/2012 5:34:56 AM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Disgusting. Why can’t she not say anything....Mitt is a complete liberal and her husband would be embarrassed at how low the Republican party has gone.


245 posted on 06/01/2012 6:10:17 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

They need to time these releases better. Friday release? In a down news cycle, or one where Obama already looks bad because of the unemployment figures released today? My gosh. Sit on these people. Time ‘em.


256 posted on 06/01/2012 7:18:05 AM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

People are making way too much out of this. Nancy Reagan is a 90 year old woman. Let her endorse whoever she wants to endorse. The truth is that no one — not even her — knows who her late husband would have endorsed. But who cares if she says Ronald Reagan would have endorsed Romney? She’s 90 and not some political guru at this point in her life. Read the story and move on.


274 posted on 06/01/2012 10:54:24 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

What are the “strong principles” Nancy is referring to? Does she mean Romney’s stances on both sides of every issue? Or his claim that he learned to support abortion from his mother? Maybe she means his statement last month that “two people of the same gender in a loving relationship” should be able to adopt children.

If those are his principles-—and I have to assume they are, since they are proven by his actions, and not just platitudes mouthed to gullible crowds-—she can have them. I can’t imagine Reagan supporting that, myself, but even if he would have, I want no part of it.


280 posted on 06/01/2012 12:55:18 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Well, Geroge W. Romney did not approve of a Reagan presidency, did he?


350 posted on 06/02/2012 6:24:19 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

The true “Independent” Romney on the Reagen Presidency in his own words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pVqZzHm3Z4


357 posted on 06/02/2012 3:08:44 PM PDT by makomako
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone; SkyShot; Mozilla; SeekAndFind; rogue yam; BwanaNdege; redinIllinois; haakondahl; ...

Hey joe - you make sure you call Mrs. Reagan right up and inform her that: (a) she supports socialism, (b) she is an enemy of the Republic, and (c) she is turning her back on the American people!

Then post her response here so all us “socialism supporters” can read it.


382 posted on 06/05/2012 11:18:00 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Vote for Romney? That would be something like riding a moped or (dating) a fat girl, wouldn't it? Or this: You wouldn't want your FRiends catching you doing it.
392 posted on 06/06/2012 12:45:44 PM PDT by tumblindice (Our new, happy lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson