Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices poised to strike down entire healthcare law
Fox43 ^ | March 28, 2012 | By David G. Savage

Posted on 03/28/2012 9:44:18 AM PDT by Bill Buckner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-323 next last
To: newgeezer

Clinton keeps destroying the U.S.A with that Marxist Ginsburg it put on the supreme Court.And how many other marxist judges did it put on the supreme court and federal courts? Clinton also let illegals reach critical mass and did the China free trade deal that sent all our factorie and jobs to china, NAFTA etc.

Ditto for Obama and the 2 Marxists it put on the Supreme Court


61 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:17 AM PDT by rurgan (Make all laws have an expiration date of 3 years. too many laws is the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

See #10.
The Obama already humiliated the Court.
Don’t think they’re worried about returning the favor.


62 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:36 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I remember it well: the signs, the march down to the capitol, the crowds so thick that it seemed like every conservative in the country showed up. I met some great patriots that day.

I still have audio of all the speeches I could record on my Youtube channel.


63 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:46 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]



SHOW ME THE MONEY!


64 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:46 AM PDT by devolve (- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - you can*t do that with a WebTV - - - - - - - - - - - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Clinton keeps destroying the U.S.A with that Marxist Ginsburg it put on the supreme Court.And how many other marxist judges did it put on the supreme court and federal courts? Clinton also let illegals reach critical mass and did the China free trade deal that sent all our factorie and jobs to china, NAFTA etc.

Ditto for Obama and the 2 Marxists it put on the Supreme Court


65 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:58 AM PDT by rurgan (Make all laws have an expiration date of 3 years. too many laws is the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

when Ginsberg states do a salvage job she is saying “I know it is not constitutional and it might not pass but come on please save some of it for us and our agenda”


66 posted on 03/28/2012 10:15:58 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner

Ginsburg’s statement should become part of a commercial to point out the danger of activist judges.

How does and individual get to be on the Supreme Court who A) Thinks the constitution is outdated and not relevant and B) Thinks the SC is there to “help” in the interpretation and now the construction of laws.


67 posted on 03/28/2012 10:16:12 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner

Believe it when you see it.


68 posted on 03/28/2012 10:17:16 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I think we ought to listen to Alinsky." - Governor. G. Romney (R), father of Bishop Willard Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner

That will teach zippy to show disrespect to the supreme court during a state of the union address.......

One can hope.

Tough cases make bad case law....
When did it officially become the government’s jog to look after my health?

Cheers,


69 posted on 03/28/2012 10:17:41 AM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavour survives an excess of "adult supervision" (hence the American experiment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner

Preserving the remainder of the bill while removing the “individual mandate” is akin to preserving the rest of a high-rise building while removing the entire ground floor.


70 posted on 03/28/2012 10:18:11 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“I don’t know if I would go that far in saying how the Justices would rule based on questioning. I’ve seen these dudes look like they were going to go one direction and the ruling go the other way. I’ll pop the champagne cork when the actual ruling comes down.”

Yup.


71 posted on 03/28/2012 10:18:20 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I think we ought to listen to Alinsky." - Governor. G. Romney (R), father of Bishop Willard Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner
Due to the momentous impact, I think the judges may try to avoid a 5-4 decision.

They could strike down the mandate, but throw a few bones to the liberals to get a stronger majority opinion. Platitudes about "caring" and "the most needy" would likely draw in a couple votes.

Clearly, the law is unconstitutional and even the libs know it, but it will hurt them to say it out loud.

72 posted on 03/28/2012 10:18:27 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Ginsburg said the court should do a “salvage job,”


That topic was directly addressed by Judge Vinson, when he said that it is not the Court’s job to edit, line by line, all 2700 pages. Remember the discussions of how obscure and impenetrable the text of the law is.

A happy consequence of deleting the law in its entirity is that it deletes the funding for all of the Obamacrats which have so far pumped out 10,000 pages of health care regulations which are to support Obamacare.


73 posted on 03/28/2012 10:19:31 AM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Pardon my skepticism but I will believe it when I see it.


74 posted on 03/28/2012 10:19:31 AM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner
"One way or another, Congress will have to revisit it in toto," said Justice Antonin Scalia.


"Start cleaning up Dorothy, we're having company!"

75 posted on 03/28/2012 10:19:34 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Okieshooter
“2.5 million of them would be thrown off the insurance rolls,” said Edwin Kneedler.”

  This is the sort of thing that could actually cause insurance rates to drop. Horrors!! What will the Democrat party do when people can afford their own insurance?
76 posted on 03/28/2012 10:20:03 AM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservativesister

Yesterday, someone on another thread said that he had argued in front of Scotus and often you feel that their questions are leaning in your favor and bingo they rule against you.


77 posted on 03/28/2012 10:21:26 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

Yes, Baby Bush’s SCOTUS appointments really salvaged his presidency in my eyes. Thanks to shooting down Hariett Miers.


78 posted on 03/28/2012 10:21:39 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (REPEAL OBAMACARE. Nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner

I hope they do, but I am not going to hold my breath nor bet the house on it.


79 posted on 03/28/2012 10:21:43 AM PDT by b4its2late (Patience is not a virtue, it is a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bill Buckner
This is BS. No way it gets struck down. Here is the headline when I logon to Yahoo: SOME JUSTICES SEEM OPEN TO SAVING PARTS OF LAW.

I'd love to see it declared unconstitutional; but I can't see 5 justices voting that way.

80 posted on 03/28/2012 10:23:01 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson