Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Got Served
American Thinker ^ | February 1, 2012 | Cindy Simpson

Posted on 02/01/2012 7:17:02 PM PST by Sallyven

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 681-693 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: map
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.”

To repeat, for emphasis:

For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

Minor expressly refused to give an authoritative definition of NBC.

122 posted on 02/01/2012 8:58:39 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
“Natural Born Citizen” has ALWAYS meant “Citizen at the Moment of Birth”

Oh, you're a sneaky snake, aren't you!
You are right, a natural born citizen is always going to be a citizen at birth.

A simple test for you - a man and a woman immigrate to the US. They both become citizens of the US through the naturalization process. They then have a child in one of the several States of the US.

Is that child a citizen or a natural born citizen?

123 posted on 02/01/2012 8:58:58 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

baloney they are afraid to rock the boat. if they agreed with you why were there so many attempts to change the NBC requirement?


124 posted on 02/01/2012 8:59:22 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
If I were in your same shoes, I would pass this evidence to the Israels for safe keeping.

But then, they may already have it.

125 posted on 02/01/2012 9:00:06 PM PST by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
"“Natural Born Citizen” has ALWAYS meant “Citizen at the Moment of Birth”

NO IT HASN'T. When I was in school and CIVICS was being taught we were taught that a Natural Born Citizen was one born of two citizen parents.

126 posted on 02/01/2012 9:00:21 PM PST by Spunky (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

I know exactly what I am talking about.

You clearly do not understand what you are talking about.

I suggest you study the definition of the word “ignorant” before you use that term, again.


127 posted on 02/01/2012 9:01:16 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sallyven
IMOM = International Man of Mystery

128 posted on 02/01/2012 9:02:44 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

A capias warrant is a warrant issued by a civil court to compel someone to perform an action.


129 posted on 02/01/2012 9:03:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Sallyven; All

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal
on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity
are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup.
The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated
only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because
they see that none of their leaders are doing
anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.


130 posted on 02/01/2012 9:03:20 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From Here. Liberty Legal Foundation.

Minor Court’s Definition of Natural Born Citizen Under Article II2

The United States Supreme Court defined the term “natural born citizen” in Minor v. Happersett. 88 U.S. at 167. The Minor Court established that “it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

It is clear that the Minor Court was referring to the term “natural born citizen,” as it appears in article II of the Constitution because, in the paragraph preceding the definition quoted here, that Court quoted the article II requirement that the President must be a “natural born citizen.”

The Minor Court definition of natural born citizen is immediately followed by a statement that “there have been doubts” about the broader class of people identified as “citizens.” However, this statement is immediately followed by the clarification that there have “never been doubts” as to the narrower class of natural born citizens.

This understanding of the Minor Court statement is supported by its extensive discussion of the broader term “citizen” at the beginning of the Court's opinion. The Court concludes its discussion of the term citizen by stating, “When used in this sense it is understood as conveying the idea of membership of a nation, and nothing more.”

The Court, therefore, clearly established that the term “citizen” in its opinion was to be understood to be very broad. Nothing in this opinion should be read as an attempt to independently construe the United States Constitution.

To the contrary, this section and the following section of this opinion are intended to show that this Court is simply applying the construction established by United States Supreme Court precedent.

Court's statement is unambiguous: it established two distinct classes of people, citizens and natural born citizens; “citizen” is a broad term that is inclusive of all “natural born citizens”; as to the outer limits of the term “citizen” there are doubts; and as to the definition of “natural born citizen” there have “never been doubts”.

The Minor Court's definition of the term natural born citizen uses the term “parents.” This is the plural form of the term “parent.” Had the Court intended to indicate natural born citizen status could be conferred upon an individual with one citizen parent, the Court could have used the term “parent” instead of “parents.” The Court could also have identified a specific parent using the terms “father” or “mother.” It did not use the terms “mother,” “father,” or “parent.” Instead it chose to use the plural term “parents.” The plain language meaning of this term indicates a requirement for both parents to be citizens.

131 posted on 02/01/2012 9:03:20 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
You are wrong.
you do not care that you are wrong.

Sometimes, it is not worth it to argue with crazy “birthers” but in defense of Rubio, it is now well worth the time.

132 posted on 02/01/2012 9:05:02 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

so according to law a foundling of unknown parentage is a citizen at birth thus a NBC....yeah and Bin Laden or Prince Charles’ illegitimate baby born to a visitor in the US can be President! Were our founders that stupid?


133 posted on 02/01/2012 9:07:42 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You sound like alsore with his “no controlling legal authority” meme when he got caught soliciting campaign money from a religious nunnery some years ago.

JC


134 posted on 02/01/2012 9:08:28 PM PST by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

Fascinating - does anyone have any idea, specifically, who did this? Is it being corrected?


135 posted on 02/01/2012 9:08:33 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

ROFL!

Do you have delusions of grandeur, too?


136 posted on 02/01/2012 9:09:21 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
It's a "gotcha" statement. Look at it closer.
A natural born citizen is always going to be a citizen at birth. That follows natural law.
However, a "citizen at birth" isn't always a natural born citizen. That follows statutory law.
137 posted on 02/01/2012 9:10:51 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

If she was naturalized BEFORE you were born here and your father was also a citizen at that time, then you’re good to go!

JC


138 posted on 02/01/2012 9:11:29 PM PST by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
I know exactly what I am talking about.

Nonsense.

ig·no·rant adj \ˈig-n(ə-)rənt\

1 a: destitute of knowledge or education ; also: lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified
b: resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence

2 : unaware, uninformed

— ig·no·rant·ly adverb
— ig·no·rant·ness noun
139 posted on 02/01/2012 9:12:39 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You and Obama both make really good [fer nuthing ] obsfucating lawyer types [ cept for the fact that no one is allowed to see any credentials ].

You puked up this same bile 4 years ago and now your time is almost up. Even IL joined the group of 7 so far to review Obama qualifications to be on the ballot.

buh bah!


140 posted on 02/01/2012 9:13:13 PM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 681-693 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson