Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh defends Newt: Coordinated Avalanche Against Newt Doesn't Match My Memory of Reagan Years
Rush ^ | January 26, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/26/2012 11:15:49 AM PST by Kaslin


RUSH: How long's it gonna be, folks, before we start seeing billboards all over, Florida, other upcoming primary states with Rick Perry on 'em saying, "Miss me yet?" How long's that gonna be? You remember when they had the George Bush billboards, "Miss me yet?" a couple months into the regime?

Anyway, great to have you here, folks, already Thursday, fastest week in the media. Goes even faster when one of the days you spend 12 hours, ten hours, whatever it was, in an airplane, like I did? Great to have you here, as always, it really is a thrill and a delight. Telephone number if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882, and the e-mail address,

Boy, this Newt stuff. Did you know any of this Newt stuff, Snerdley? Let's go through the list. By the way, you should know, there's a blog in the Washington Post. It's called The Plum Line and it's written by a guy named Greg Sargent, and I think he used to be at Editor and Publisher back when it was in business. He was one of the guys there when it went out of business. Very, very left-leaning. He's got a post that includes this. "The New York Times reports today -- based on unclear sourcing -- that Mitt Romney has endorsed a strategy of raising doubts about Newt Gingrich’s 'emotional stability.'" And then there are others that are raising questions here about Newt and his mendacity, his forthrightness.

It is incredible. Yeah, yeah. Well, during the CNN debate with John King, he said that he had all kinds of friends that could vouch for the fact that he had never told his wife he wanted an open marriage. And so yesterday Newt in the campaign said, (paraphrasing) "Nope, nope, there aren't any friends. It's just my two daughters. What I said in the debate, that wasn't true." But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Here's the front page of Drudge. Let's give you the headlines.

Newt flashback, 1983: "Reagan Responsible For National Decay." This is Newt saying these things.

Newt 1986: "The Reagan Administration Has Failed, Is Failing."

Newt, 1988: "If Bush Runs As A Continuation Of Reaganism, He Will Lose." Now, of course, Bush ran as a continuation of Reaganism, and he won, and he soundly defeated the loser, Michael Dukakis.

Then here's the story on the debate claim. "During last Thursday’s debate, when CNN moderator John King asked about Marianne Gingrich’s interview on ABC accusing Newt Gingrich of having requested an 'open marriage,' part of Gingrich’s crowd-pleasing answer was this charge: 'Let me be quite clear. The story is false. Every personal friend I have who knew us in that period said the story was false. We offered several of them to ABC to prove it was false. They weren’t interested because they would like to attack any Republican.'

"Now, last night, King reported on his show CNN’s John King, USA that Gingrich had spoken inaccurately when he said that friends had been offered to ABC to rebut the story. 'Well, tonight, after persistent questioning by our staff, the Gingrich campaign concedes now Speaker Gingrich was wrong both in his debate answer and in our interview yesterday,' King said. 'Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond says the only people the campaign offered to ABC were the speaker’s two daughters from his first marriage.'" So he's out there, and he told John King during the debate, this is one of the answers that got a standing O. That he'd offered ABC a whole bunch of friends of his to rebut this point that he never said to his wife he wanted an open marriage. That turns out not to be true.

Then there is YouTube video in 1988: "Bush Won't Win If He Runs To Continue Reaganism." Of course, Bush 41 won in a landslide in 1988 and it was largely because the American people wanted four more years of Reagan. There are other examples of this profound criticism of Reagan. Drudge's lead headline is, "Insider: Gingrich Repeatedly Insulted Reagan." Now, when I saw all it is stuff -- and obviously it's a coordinated document dump here, opposition research dump. It's obviously coordinated. And this stuff, by the way, that's on Greg Sargent's blog, Plum Line, that's the thinly sourced stuff in the New York Times about Newt being emotionally unstable and Romney putting that out, that's why Romney is not liked by the Republicans that don't like him. It's that kind of stuff that his campaign puts out.

If you want to know, why do these people hate Romney so much? In 2008, you recall, Huckabee and McCain hated Romney. Now they both love Romney, but back then they hated Romney. It's because of stuff like this. He's doing stuff like this in ads before they had any money to run their own ads. And, I'll tell you what, the way this hit me, I told you people this before. I first heard of Newt Gingrich when he was perhaps the premiere defender of Ronald Reagan. This was in the early 1980s of course, Reagan assumed office in 1981. I was working in Kansas City. Between 1979 and 1983 I was working for the Kansas City Royals. In 1983 I left the Royals and corporate America and went back to radio. I was gonna give it one more shot because that was my passion, it's what I loved and it's what I did best. And I learned that corporate structures were not for me.

But even during those last two years, of course, I'm in my private time which there wasn't a lot of when you work for a professional baseball team, 18-hour days, during home stands and so forth. But nevertheless I was as immersed in politics then as I am now. What's funny is nobody at the Royals knew it because nobody ever talked about it. All you did was talk baseball there. If you talked about anything other than what was in the sports page, there was something wrong with you. So nobody I worked with had any idea that I had any interest whatsoever or knowledge whatsoever in politics. But I'm watching this stuff and what happened was, the moment Reagan's inaugurated, the Democrats, the media, it was as vicious an assault on a human being, on a Republican, as there is today.

Now, those of you who were not paying attention back then or who were too young to pay attention, don't doubt me, it was vicious. And Reagan did not have a media on his side. It was the three networks and CNN and the newspapers. There was no talk radio. There were no blogs, of course. There wasn't the Internet. There was no alternative media. Reagan had National Review. That was his lone ally in the media, William Buckley's National Review. That was it. And early on in the Reagan years, does the name David Stockman ring a bell? David Stockman, the first budget director for Reagan, within the first year goes rogue and says Reaganomics won't work, can't work, it was bad.

It was a total back stab. That's where the name "trickle down" actually got created I think, and became standard vernacular in the popular lexicon. That, and supply-side. And I remember the stories about Reagan taking Stockman to the woodshed. That's a quote from the story. That's how it was described, to get his mind right. But that unleashed a torrent from Tip O'Neill, from every Democrat, I mean all these people. Reagan lied, Bush was right, it is voodoo economics, oh, this is horrible. We were in a great recession at the time here. The Democrats loved what Stockman did, and the guy who self-appointed himself to stop all this was Newt. And that's where I first heard of him.

Newt Gingrich and Bob Walker and a couple of others that were members of what was called the Conservative Opportunity Society, I don't know that it had been named as such yet, but it was a bunch of young, relatively new members of the House on the Republican side who were conservatives. They had special orders every night. Once the House had finished its official business, as long as somebody shows up on the floor of the House to speak, the cameras on C-SPAN stay on. It didn't matter that nobody else was in the House chamber. They stayed on until the last person left the floor. And Newt and his guys were in there five hours a night. They were rotating, each of them would speak for an hour. They would yield to each other. They would interrupt themselves for questions and so forth. But the cameras only were focused on the well. You never knew that there was no audience there, except there was never any applause. You never knew that the House chamber was empty, unless you knew what special orders were.

And this went on for years. And it's where I heard of Newt Gingrich. And Newt had appointed himself the personal defender of Ronald Reagan and had appointed himself the singular person with his buddies to counter all of what he thought were the lies of the day being spouted by the media and the Democrats. Then I leave the Royals and I get back into radio. And I decide that I want to get this guy Gingrich on the air to have a chat with, and it was difficult. Couldn't do it. The requests that Gingrich were getting were overwhelming; he wasn't really interested in doing a lot of them. He didn't really have a whole lot of time.

The station I was working on was owned by the Mormon church, Bonneville Broadcasting. It turned out that somebody inside Bonneville Broadcasting unearthed a contact that was able to get to Newt, and I got an interview with him for about 20 or 25 minutes. I don't remember anything about the interview. These are just little details here to spice up the story. But this went on for years. These special orders went on for years, and it wasn't just the defense of Reagan. Newt Gingrich was ripping the Speaker of the House at the time, Tip O'Neill; and when Tip left and "Fort Worthless" Jim Wright came in, the assault continued.

It was everything you wish was happening today, is all I can tell you. It was everything you wish the entire Republican Party was doing today. It was let by Newt Gingrich, and what was he doing? He was defending Reagan. Now, all of this stuff that hit Drudge and everywhere else last night about Newt telling everybody the country goes to hell if they continue Reaganism and that Newt insulted Reagan and that the Reagan administration failed and Iran-Contra... I never heard any of that. I started doing this particular program in Sacramento in 1984, and I was just as immersed in national politics then as I am now, and I could honestly tell you this.

I'm not denying it happened, don't misunderstand. I just telling you, because it did happen. I've got the audio; the YouTube video is out there. Newt did say this stuff. I just don't remember it. I don't remember anybody in 1988 telling George Bush, "You're gonna lose big if you just continue Reagan," because the whole Republican Party strategy was to fool Republicans into thinking that that's what Bush was gonna do. Their whole strategy was to tell the Republicans, "Okay, I'm going to." I remember George Bush at that New Orleans convention. His theme was, "I'm gonna complete my mission," and it was based off the fact he had been shot down in World War II.

They had the video of him being rescued at sea after his plane was shot down. He had to parachute out of his plane to be shot down. Great hero story. "Complete my mission." It was all intertwined with continuing what had happened after Reagan, economically. Now, you people know that I am blessed with a pretty good memory. And I don't remember Newt Gingrich in the 1980s -- I'm not denying it happened. I'm just telling you, this stuff was a total shock to me last night when I learned that Newt had said this stuff. (interruption) I don't know. Well, we've got the audio and we'll listen to it and see whether it was off the cuff or what, 'cause Newt does... (interruption)

It's like... (interruption) Well, it's like... (interruption) He does. The latest thing he blurted out is a moon colony. We're gonna have a moon colony, get 13,000 people on the moon, and make it the 51st state. And we can have honeymoons in space, honeymoons and weddings in space. It would be really funny because of weightlessness. Wait 'til people find out how much fun you can have when you're weightless! This stuff just came rolling out yesterday. Now, here's the problem with that. Here we are in Florida and Obama has effectively killed the space program so obviously Newt says (summarized), "Hey, I got an idea for space: We'll colonize the moon!

"We'll make at it 51st state, we'll have weddings and honeymoons and weightlessness." Well, the problem with that is the other part of his campaign is focused on reducing spending and reforming entitlements and some modification in health care spending, Social Security spending. So you're in a state where that is a crucially important thing to people. I mean, you're telling them to do all that and then at the same time you're gonna go colonize the moon. It's a disconnect. But that would fall under the category of "grandiose," and it just came out of nowhere. Then National Review Online has a DEVASTATING piece on Newt.

Elliott Abrams, who was in the Reagan administration for foreign policy. Elliott Abrams is married to the daughter of Norman Podhoretz. Elliott Abrams is of impeccable, reputation and character. I think Elliott Abrams... In fact, last time he was at the White House he was walking out of the West Wing as I walked in. He's always been nice, stopped, shook my hand, thanked me for saving the country. (These guys always say that, then they smile and walk off.) But anyway, this piece by Elliott Abrams, it just slices and dices with the most harmless tone. There nothing vicious about it.

You've got another piece by Bob Tyrrell (known in public as R. Emmett Tyrrell. He started the American Spectator.) It just dumps on Newt, and Elliott Abrams' piece specifically focuses on Newt's relationship with Reagan and how there really wasn't one. So this is obviously a coordinated attack that's designed to take Newt out here in Florida. That's what's going on. It's happening. We all knew stuff like this was gonna happen. We all worry about when candidates are gonna implode and this kind of thing. My only point here is: I didn't know any of this stuff. That's the only thing I'm telling you, and I was shocked when I read it.


RUSH: You've got Nancy Reagan. People have produced, I think, either a letter or a video from Nancy Reagan saying that Newt would be the obvious inheritor of Reaganism. And you've got Michael Reagan, Ronald Reagan's son, who's endorsed Newt. This Elliott Abrams piece, though, folks, of all the stuff that's out there is probably the most devastating because Elliott Abrams' credentials are impeccable. He almost went to jail for the cause. For example, here's one thing he says about Newt: "As a new member of Congress in the Reagan years -- and I was an assistant secretary of state -- Gingrich voted with the president regularly, but equally often spewed insulting rhetoric at Reagan, his top aides and his policies to defeat communism. Gingrich was voluble and certain in predicting that Reagan's policies would fail, and in all of this he was dead wrong." That's the tone of the entire piece by Elliott Abrams. But there's more than just an opposition research document dump here going on. You have Elliott Abrams, Bob Tyrrell coming out with some of this stuff. It is overwhelming, and it happens in one day.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: elections; florida; gingrich; newt; waronnewt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Support Free Republic!

41 posted on 01/26/2012 3:30:42 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


42 posted on 01/26/2012 3:32:47 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Syncro; RedMDer; Kaslin; DJ MacWoW; TitansAFC; greyfoxx39; Lakeshark; Windflier

I listened to Rush today!

Finally, he understands the dirty politics of Romney, whose insatiable lust for power will stop at nothing to achieve its goal.

Of course the cowardly liar can’t bring himself to call obama “a socialist” but it’s -OK to lie and smear our patriot, conservative Newt Gingrich, because conservatives are Romney’s enemies along with the enemies of the GOP-E and whole damn lot of Newt haters!




43 posted on 01/26/2012 3:34:15 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer


44 posted on 01/26/2012 3:35:06 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No matter how many times I read it, that’s a VERY watery defense. :(

45 posted on 01/26/2012 3:35:41 PM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Sorry folks but all of these know nothings attacking are all shills for Romney. The Romney is inevitable crowd are playing a serious game of lies now caught big time. Don’t ask any leftist about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Reagan Nat’l Security Advisor Bud McFarlane:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Reagan Economist Art Laffer:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Reagan WH political director Jeffrey Lord:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials/Ask Reagan Policy Analyst Peter Ferrara

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan bonafides. Ask Reagan media consultant Richard Quinn:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Reagan’s Speechwriting Dir. Bently Elliott:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Reagan’s older son Michael Reagan:

Don’t ask NRO about Newt’s Reagan credentials. Ask Ronald Reagan’s beloved wife Nancy:

worth a repeat

46 posted on 01/26/2012 3:35:47 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am looking at the latest headlines

Dole assails Gingrich in plea to conservatives

ABCNEWS: Romney Failed to Disclose Swiss Bank Account Income: $1,700...

And thinking that all those that started thread after thread bashing Santorum personally and politically ought to be thankful Santorum didn’t drop out.As we never know... he may be the last one standing.

47 posted on 01/26/2012 3:39:42 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Rush is radio. I’d have to listen to it to make a final determination. But reading the transcript, it sounds awfully feeble. Not asking him to endorse, and I understand why he doesn’t. Nevertheless — he could do better if what he wants to do is advance Newt or slow down Romney.

48 posted on 01/26/2012 3:41:59 PM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Santorum, nobody is saying a negative word about. He's not under assault by anybody."

Rush obviously spends no time on FR.

49 posted on 01/26/2012 3:44:54 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

I listened to it live. It sounded to me that Rush was trying to play both sides of the fence....unlike Mark Levin, who came out blasting Romney and the Republican establishment for the despicable attacks on Newt.

50 posted on 01/26/2012 3:46:48 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gingrich did not attack capitalism.

Have you, by any chance, been going to the Ulstermans Report blog, and following what the Wall Street Insider has to say about business, international banking, and Globalism?

51 posted on 01/26/2012 3:50:22 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CASchack
I listened to it live. It sounded to me that Rush was trying to play both sides of the fence

That will not do. Mitt Romney has no business running as a Republican. Not even by Rockefeller standards. Rush Limbaugh of all people ought to know that. There simply aren't two sides of fence in play here and it is not helpful to talk as if there are. :(

52 posted on 01/26/2012 3:56:40 PM PST by Lady Lucky (A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Keep a list of the GOPEe and check it twice.

Let’s see how many back peddle before/after their coordinated attack on Newt backfires.

53 posted on 01/26/2012 4:01:50 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

True, that. :)

54 posted on 01/26/2012 4:04:01 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather


55 posted on 01/26/2012 4:32:09 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Eww I was eating dinner when I read that! :)

56 posted on 01/26/2012 4:33:05 PM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


for future reference

57 posted on 01/26/2012 4:39:55 PM PST by W. W. SMITH (Obama is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Long read, but Rush Limbaugh defends Newt!!

That's thing--if it's longer than one paragraph most people won't read it, just react to the headline.

They heard Rush read all these "articles" on air and assumed he agreed with them. He had to read them so everyone would know what he was talking about.

58 posted on 01/26/2012 4:52:29 PM PST by silent_jonny ("Behold, I will do a new thing, Now it shall spring forth; Shall you not know it?" -- Isaiah 43:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]



59 posted on 01/26/2012 4:55:18 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Mitt is doing the spear throwing and he doesn’t see Santorum as a threat.

60 posted on 01/26/2012 5:27:20 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson