Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: South Carolina GOP Presidential Debate on CNN 8 P.M. EST
Thursday, January 19, 2011 | Kristinn

Posted on 01/19/2012 4:09:17 PM PST by kristinn

And then there were three and a half minds left campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul.

Link to CNN livestream page.

Hosted by CNN's John King at the North Charleston Coliseum.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; cnnscprimarydebate; gingrich; gopdebate; gopscprimarydebate; lautenberg; newt; newtgingrich; santorum; scprimarydebate; southcarolina; worstprimaryever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,261-1,2801,281-1,3001,301-1,320 ... 1,461-1,471 next last
To: Kenny; mylife

That’s alright. Our handsome Texas governor did us proud.


1,281 posted on 01/19/2012 8:08:24 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1224 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Post Debate analysis ... I'm sorry I didn't add anything during the debate, but I was schooling my teenage daughters.

The clear break: And then there were four, or two groups of two. It was clear from audience reaction and I agree with the audience, Newt and Mitt are in one group and Rick and Ron are in the other.

I can not vote for Mitt in the primary. Paul was great, but there was zero foreign policy in the debate. Rick suffered from first person syndrome (FPS). Michelle had the same problem ... “I did this”, “ I did that” ... “I, I, I.” Newt dealt with ideas, and we assume they are his ideas, but it wasn't “I, I, I.” Most likely, a good chunk of those ideas are from some policy analyst. We know Newt reads, not a bad thing. However, the speak coming from Rick was sophomoric. (a good moment for schooling my elder daughter who will be going to states for mock trial in Pa. She's a junior by the way, not a sophomore..) Rick was not presidential in my estimation. I saw little evidence that Rick could debate Obama effectively.

Despite Mitt's stuttering, replay the video, it is there, I'd have to say he is in line for 2nd or 3rd place in the debate. Since the debate did not deal with foreign policy, it was a major advantage for Ron. I found myself asking for Ron Paul answers to questions, knowing what they would be. We know how Ron is weak beyond our borders. Given that knowledge, Ron did not improve his position in my eyes. Based on debate performance, Ron came in second place to Newt, close to Mitt. Based on knowledge, Ron is in third place, ahead of Rick. I do not think Rick can lead, I do know Ron will not screw up fiscally.

So that leaves the final tally: Newt won. Mitt is hanging in the top tier. Then Ron, followed by Rick. I'd vote for any of the over the occupant in the white hut. Newt was the clear winner. Rick needs to drop out next week. Paul should do the same, but most likely won't. Mitt is toast. Let him waste money and further prove that Republican Party leaders down to the state and county level need to shut their traps and let conservatives vote without interference.

1,282 posted on 01/19/2012 8:08:32 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (Maxine, I'll see you there. I'm not changing my ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

Uh, if folks like you continue to spittle the lies rather than cite the truth of the matter, then yes, it will not bode well for America. But then some folks find more solace in gutter play than in standing up for what is right, and spreading the lies spewed by the media is not ‘what is right’.


1,283 posted on 01/19/2012 8:08:45 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I had that over Thanksgiving. Hot tea with brandy and honey helped alot! xoxo


1,284 posted on 01/19/2012 8:09:15 PM PST by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1277 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Yeah, he just comes across as a kid among the grown-ups, itching for a fight.


1,285 posted on 01/19/2012 8:10:42 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1190 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

LOL!

Holy Carp!


1,286 posted on 01/19/2012 8:10:48 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1270 | View Replies]

To: Poser

I thought they all did well. Paul did very well on domestic issues as usual but of course has that pre ww2 military mindset. Santorum scored points as easily the biggest social conservative, made good working class arguenys on manufacturing and exceeded expectations. Newt has the opening salvo but then focused on how government creates jobs. Mitt was the one being attacked and held his own and defended private sector job creation.


1,287 posted on 01/19/2012 8:11:23 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 992 | View Replies]

To: llandres

Thank you for that detail. I only hope they do not play editing games the way they have in the past on replays of significant things. I’m putting the kettle on ... no popcorn on this newly root canaled tooth.


1,288 posted on 01/19/2012 8:11:32 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1269 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

True. The difference is, and I was never one of them, but for some odd reason, a lot of women though Clinton was good-looking and charming. Women are a lot more forgiving of a good-looking, charming man.

That said, Newt is still our best choice at this time. I’d rather lose with Newt than lose with Romney.


1,289 posted on 01/19/2012 8:11:32 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1212 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; newzjunkey

Just google, single women obama 2012”
They loved him in ‘08, but percentages were even in ‘10.
Recent info, makes it look even worse for hussein with the ladies. Funny how they get that “used” feeling.


1,290 posted on 01/19/2012 8:12:34 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: j.argese

I have a lot of Catholic relatives. I don’t see where that comes into it.


1,291 posted on 01/19/2012 8:12:52 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Please stop the ridiculous overblown Rick S talking points from the Paul bots !
Rick S is way
More conservative than Mittens and just as conservative as Newt !
Newt gave is the disasters like Motor voter law which increased
Dem voter fraud .
Newt stupid tax revisions Mae more people free of federal taxes !

Newt and global warming bs.
Spare us the Rick S hysteria


1,292 posted on 01/19/2012 8:13:06 PM PST by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

I think your insights are right on the mark.


1,293 posted on 01/19/2012 8:14:19 PM PST by JPG (Matters at which the foolish laugh and at whose consequences the prudent weep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

I’ve always like Santorum, but he did one thing tonight that I thought was pretty low....well several, but this one stuck in my craw.

He and Newt were certainly partners in the GOP takeover in 1994. But not only did he give Newt no credit (when he clearly deserves most of it), but he talked about behind-closed-doors discussions. Really low-rent.

I’d like to see just one person ask this qustion of one of the backstabbers who served with Newt back then:

“If Newt is so unstable, erratic, and undisciplined, how did he even GET to be Speaker over 250 other candidates?”

I now view Santorum pretty much as a scumbag.

Hank


1,294 posted on 01/19/2012 8:14:47 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Take care, you know the lay of the land now.
I missed Perry in the debate......


1,295 posted on 01/19/2012 8:14:52 PM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ Having the right to be angry does not give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1263 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

This is the best hope we have moving forward.

Good for Newt. Good for Perry.

Work DC from the inside and the outside


1,296 posted on 01/19/2012 8:15:23 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1272 | View Replies]

To: show
Might as well ban me now then. I'll be supporting the conservative candidate, while you'll be lying about who Sarah Palin really supports. Be sure you let Jim know.

And if so-called 'conservatives' [sic] continue to support a moderate like Noot to the point he wins the nomination, then enjoy another four years of Obama. I won't be here, because I will have been banned for supporting the conservative.

1,297 posted on 01/19/2012 8:15:34 PM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1275 | View Replies]

To: gswilder
6 years in HIS WIFEs bed (not a motel or someplace else).

The fact is Newt and his ex-wife were seperated for 6 yrs. living apart. They agreed each other could date during that time...Newt attempted a reconciliation after that but it flopped majorly. He filed for divorce and she knew well this was coming for years.

Hopefully the truth of the events will come out...but it appears the news organizations aren't interested in talking with those who can dispute Newt's ex-wifes attacks.

I looked into this further today...went way back in history to see what their marriage and relationship was about. IMO it was a marriage which should have never happened.

1,298 posted on 01/19/2012 8:15:38 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: gswilder

Wasn’t it inthe separation agreement filed with the court. This was all hashed out years ago. Newt and her were not living together.


1,299 posted on 01/19/2012 8:16:48 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1257 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan
...only 9 of [Romney's] 36 judicial appointments were Republicans ..."

Wow. Pretty much beats the crap out of the ol' "But but but but ... what about the Supreme Court nominations!!!"

Romney HAS TO LOSE. No matter how much Republicans wan't to believe otherwise, Romney would be as bad as Obama. In every way.

1,300 posted on 01/19/2012 8:17:42 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 972 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,261-1,2801,281-1,3001,301-1,320 ... 1,461-1,471 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson