Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin: GOP Should Not Alienate Ron Paul Voters
NewsMax ^ | Jan. 4, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 01/04/2012 1:16:42 PM PST by La Enchiladita

Sarah Palin said she wasn't surprised at Rick Santorum's success in Iowa, and warned that the GOP should not take Ron Paul's supporters lightly.

Speaking on Fox News before Iowa's final numbers were in, she called Santorum "spot-on" with his policies toward Iran and praised his "social conservative" positions.

Her strongest comments came for Paul, however, saying "the GOP had better not marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters after this" because "a lot of Americans are war-weary and we are broke" and Paul has reached that constituency well. She warned that the GOP "better work with them."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaign4liberty; economy; feminism; larouchies; libertarians; liebertarians; markets; nukes4iranpaul; palin; randpaul; ronpaul; sarahpalin; stealthsocialism; warweary; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-345 next last
To: marty60
Gee Sarah when did you become a racist anti-Semite?

I wonder if that is what the German people said about Hitlers thugs.

See, now that's exactly what Sarah is talking about. There are no doubt racists and anti-semites who support Paul. Some of them maybe even worked on his newsletter back in the 90s. But I have no doubt they represent a small fringe of the Paul voters. Calling all Paul voters Nazis is a great way to get them to dig in their heels and urge Paul to run third party.

201 posted on 01/04/2012 5:25:42 PM PST by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Same mistake Palin makes...you think they are rational.

moneybomb, fed, moneybomb, fed....i win the debate

They will do whatever Paul tells them to do, it’s up to Paul, because they are in the cult of personality - Paulian style.

If Paul believe in half of what he says, he’ll support the GOP nominee and help defeat Obama...then maybe he’ll get a little respect.


202 posted on 01/04/2012 5:36:41 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: DB

If Newt appointed him Fed Chairman, I think Ron Paul would be his own agent. But, since Newt says he wants to fire Beranke- and he says he wants to audit the Fed-—then there would seem to be no reason to interfere with Paul’s audit.

I think Paul is rsponsible enough that he is not going to release findings (w/o consultation) that might dramtically effect the economy— but ultimately,I think he would expect that his findings be addressed in an orderly process.

I think it would be a good thing.


203 posted on 01/04/2012 5:46:27 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Well one has to refute the Paul can't win argument with something, so I cited polls. Google Paul Obama Poll and there are plenty.

I am beginning to feel much better about Pauls' chances, still a long shot for sure but other than Newt, Paul is the only anti-establishment constitution government guy in the race. Mitt is not going to win (I hope) Santorum might, but I doubt it so that leaves Newt or Paul. I am a happy camper.

204 posted on 01/04/2012 5:49:47 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Same mistake Republicans make....you think they won’t compromise and will actually return the country to a constitutionally limited government.

Republicans can be just as “brainwashed” as Paulbots are...they follow whatever their leaders say as long as there is a “R” next to the leader’s name.

If Republicans believe in half of what they say, they’ll
nominate a true conservative instead of the typical moderate, establishment type.

Defeating Obama is definately a very valid cause, but if the alternative is a liberal like Romney then how does that really help America in the long term?


205 posted on 01/04/2012 5:53:22 PM PST by Turtlepower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

” so I cited polls.”

No. You mentioned polls. You have cited zero polls. I asked for evidence to support your assertion. I have seen no consistent polling with Paul beating Obama...if you have a few, I’d love to see them.

Only Mittens and Ginrich consistently beat Obama....and they are the only two who win all 13 key swing states vs. Obama.


206 posted on 01/04/2012 5:59:05 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Don’t forget, Palin sez we shouldn’t alienate Paul’s Stormfront ‘Itbach al-Yahood!’ folks, either!

O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!


I think I’ve fallen through the Looking-Glass, here.


207 posted on 01/04/2012 6:01:32 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Turtlepower

“Same mistake Republicans make....you think they won’t compromise and will actually return the country to a constitutionally limited government.”

That statement could be true if you consider Obama returning the country to constitutionally limited government.

Paul can’t win. He can only go Turd Party and give it to Obama...and his moron cultist would follow him off the cliff to another Obama term, a victory that will give us ObamaCare to go with Social Security...one step closer to a Socialist death.


208 posted on 01/04/2012 6:02:52 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

ha


209 posted on 01/04/2012 6:10:13 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Google Ron Paul Obama Poll
Here is the first one google returns Dec 21, 2011

New Poll: Ron Paul Betters Other GOP Candidates Vs Obama
www.infowars.com/new-poll-ron-paul-betters-other-gop-candidates-...

210 posted on 01/04/2012 6:13:18 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Ron Paul has repeatedly said he will not run as a third party candidate.


211 posted on 01/04/2012 6:16:49 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: PAConservative1

“..his nutjob positions such as not having Israel as an ally and not caring if Iran gets nukes.”

FYI:
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden/ron-paul-tells-haaretz-i-am-not-an-anti-semite-1.404208


212 posted on 01/04/2012 6:19:52 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Yep, remember the “Broken Glass Republicans”? The people who would crawl thru broken glass to get their conservative candidate elected. Who would have thought they would now be called “Paultards” on FR?

Romney’s people don’t even seem that motivated, and he actually PAYS them!


213 posted on 01/04/2012 7:09:35 PM PST by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress May 24, 2011

My friends, you don’t have to -- you don’t need to do nation- building in Israel. We’re already built.

You don’t need to export democracy to Israel. We’ve already got it.

And you don’t need to send American troops to Israel. We defend ourselves.

214 posted on 01/04/2012 7:10:31 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

215 posted on 01/04/2012 7:12:26 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Mark Levin “Ron Paul Supporters Biggest A-Holes”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNnmYGZPyfc

Mark Levin On “Crackpot” Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi19kEYcZqY

Michelle Malkin on Rush Limbaugh’s remarks about Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6yHPJl_SQc

Ron Paul Sucks. Ron Paul is Racist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxJGcF2Ykzk

Dick Morris on Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGEIdx0_eTQ

Racist Don Black Explains Why He Supports Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt0VWC7gjno

Donald Trump: Ron Paul Can’t Get Elected President
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_-0hMID67A

Donald Trump on Ron Paul and running for President
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk8jXNRtyO8


216 posted on 01/04/2012 7:24:54 PM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

You never know around here!

I never thought that I’d see the day when Ginrich would be called a conservative at FR, but with Obama as the point of comparison...


217 posted on 01/04/2012 7:27:02 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Donald Trump
Dick Morris
Michelle Malkin
Mark Levin

Are people suppose to care what these people think?

218 posted on 01/04/2012 7:29:00 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

“I’d be interested to know what chunk of our armed services support Paul, and why.”

I support him because of his respect for the constitution and his desire to reign in spending and the role of government. He is an original constructionist. Lots of neocons have a problem with that. I don’t support all of his foreign policy desires, but I support the past/current direction of our foreign policy even less. I think he would make no immediate and dramatic changes, but would incrementally change its direction in a positive way. Besides that, he would never abuse his power and overstep the authority of congress and the courts. That would go against who he is.

He is also really strong on 2A, property rights, all rights for that matter, and defunding out of control agencies.

I can’t tell you what I do, but if you knew you would be truly stunned. You would without hesitation shake my hand and buy me beer for my service.


219 posted on 01/04/2012 7:34:42 PM PST by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I disagree about Perry. Everyone else has had a surge and then faltered.

I believe Santorum will be the next to do so.

It’s time for a Perry surge and if that happens, he won’t falter.


220 posted on 01/04/2012 7:35:36 PM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

A lot of people do around here. They agree more with them on various issues.


221 posted on 01/04/2012 7:41:01 PM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Totally agree with her. Well said.


222 posted on 01/04/2012 7:47:32 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

So have many people here, about his ECONOMIC policy (note in my original post I also pointed that out). Many here said he’d be a benefit to any R admin in some economic capacity. That doesn’t mean she or anyone else here would ever vote for Paul. His economic ideas are quite sound. He did a great job passing those on to his son. Am I know a Paulbot? I think 0bama seems like a great father. That’s a compliment. However, I have nothing nice to say about him otherwise and I think he’s done more to destroy this country than any single human being in my lifetime. See how that works? For heaven’s sake is the only way someone can remain “pure” is to never, ever, ever, ever, pay a compliment to someone everyone agrees should never be elected (or whatever else one is never supposed to think as deemed by some members of fr). If that’s the way it is then someone needs to post a list of things/people one is never supposed to mention (i.e. we all know Paul is the crazy uncle in the attic so we should never express appreciation for any of his ideas economic or otherwise).

Cindie


223 posted on 01/04/2012 7:50:38 PM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Thanks for posting this. It’s an “old school” FR thread, and I really miss those. Yeah, the furniture gets tossed around, but you get some good thought-provoking comments out of the crucible. Not the typical Ron Paul thread.

For later comments....


224 posted on 01/04/2012 8:02:54 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

i find it interesting that the “old timers” here seem to be the most level-headed and educated in the Constitution. most everyone else seems to be running on emotion..


225 posted on 01/04/2012 8:24:11 PM PST by sdpatriot (Rush:" the media didn't make her, so they can't control her")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Everyone knows Sarah’s “opinions” make my head explode, just having to hear her grasp at the English language to get some dull low tier point over, but if she thinks she is in the FAUX KNOW on a third party threat, Ron Paul IS already the Third Party! He’s just hiding out in OUR party. It is becoming clear who his “supporters” are, we just don’t know how bad the number is. YET.


226 posted on 01/04/2012 8:26:24 PM PST by RitaOK (The higher you poll in Iowa, the more embarrassing it is for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

This should blow your mind. Wasn’t Sarah your first of five or so candidates you were rooting for?


227 posted on 01/04/2012 8:29:09 PM PST by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter ODonnell

Libertarians already have a guy running for president, saw him on TV tonight but don’t know his name...RP would make the 4th or 5th party...communists also run. Nader could also run on the green party....there are a lot more than 2 parties running, Nader always pulls from the democrats...


228 posted on 01/04/2012 8:33:24 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Going through your posts, you hate everyone other than Romney. Why should we take you seriously again?


229 posted on 01/04/2012 8:37:09 PM PST by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

He is running Third Party already. He’s hiding out in OUR party.


230 posted on 01/04/2012 8:37:23 PM PST by RitaOK (The higher you poll in Iowa, the more embarrassing it is for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

“but I sometimes wonder if she’s been thanked enough.”

no, she hasn’t, God bless her

thanks for your thoughtful comments.


231 posted on 01/04/2012 8:41:26 PM PST by sdpatriot (Rush:" the media didn't make her, so they can't control her")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

I’m leaning towards the thought that Paul supporters are closer to the ‘Occupy’ crowd than the ‘Tea Party’ crowd.


232 posted on 01/04/2012 8:57:09 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chicken head

You are correct, if you look at the political spectrum as running from total government on the left to zero government on the right, instead of the RNC/DNC version which goes from total government to total government, with a VERY MODEST degree of permitted liberty somewhere in the middle.


233 posted on 01/04/2012 9:36:54 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Warning! the gop establishment should quit pushing their rino candidates and alienating the Tea Party folks. Paul is absolutely insane.


234 posted on 01/04/2012 9:51:01 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I’m retired from the Marine Corps and I plan to vote for Dr. Paul. Many of my friends, also retired military, mostly Marine Corps, also plan to support and vote for him. Including a full bird Colonel whom I used to work for at Camp Pendleton. Does that help answer your question?

And no, I am no part of the weed vote, though I firmly believe we’d be far better served if the WOsD and the DEA/ATF/IRS, etc., were abolished, their agents jailed or executed and their buildings torn down and the land sown with salt.


235 posted on 01/04/2012 9:53:33 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I am awe-struck. As often as we’ve been odds before, here you go with something I am 100% with you on!


236 posted on 01/04/2012 10:05:53 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Ok, who are you and what have you done with the Colonel Kangaroo I’ve come to know and loathe??? :>)


237 posted on 01/04/2012 10:14:59 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Sorry Ms. Palin, Paul’s foreign policy alienates those who support him from those of us who’d like to see America survive and not be subjected to Iranian theocratic nuclear blackmail, or worse.

Line, sand. Paul needs to pick a side - because his “coexist” fantasy just doesn’t exist in realityland.


238 posted on 01/04/2012 10:23:05 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
I'm sure I'll be back posting something loathsome soon. :)

But beyond the atheism forum on Democratic Underground, almost nobody in our nation is politically wrong 100% of the time. I even found I could agree with Mr. Obama's decision when he pardoned the two turkeys at Thanksgiving.

239 posted on 01/04/2012 10:23:22 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: LibertyLA

Very well said... From one whose ancestors have also been here from the beginning (the Mayflower).


240 posted on 01/04/2012 10:25:30 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

I thought Ron Paul voters were already an “alien nation?”


241 posted on 01/04/2012 10:27:32 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

“I plan to vote for Dr. Paul. Many of my friends, also retired military, mostly Marine Corps, also plan to support and vote for him.”

That just proves you hand out with a bunch of loony veterans. I’m a sane veteran.

“Does that help answer your question?”

Your personal anecdote is an outlier. Most veterans support a strong military and are not big fans of appeasement on terrorism and Iran getting nukes.

So, no. You’re personal story is not inspiring but downright sad.

“we’d be far better served if the WOsD and the DEA/ATF/IRS, etc., were abolished, their agents jailed or EXECUTED”

Executed eh? Yep, you’re a RonPaul loon alright.


242 posted on 01/04/2012 10:51:29 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Which two turkeys were they, Holder and Lieberman???


243 posted on 01/04/2012 10:51:29 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Your comments are duly noted, given the respect they deserve and flushed away like yesterday’s bowel movement. Thanks for playing.


244 posted on 01/04/2012 10:54:16 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

So original.

Don’t you have some DEA agents to execute...lol

FruitLoops.


245 posted on 01/04/2012 10:55:58 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Statist. See, I can do it, too. It sure was nice of you to crawl out from under your rock and start the make-calling barbra streisand from your first post to folks who were trying to be civil. Which makes you the jerk-du-jour, I would say. Congrats, it surely is a well-earned award.


246 posted on 01/04/2012 11:03:26 PM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

So you like civility?...I see.

Unless somebody would be a DEA or ATF agent, then you want them executed.

Too blinded to see your own ignorance.

Typical Paulian zombie


247 posted on 01/04/2012 11:10:21 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Well, let's see here... Since the bozos who would work for a government agency whose "mission" is CLEARLY unconstitutional are just the sort of jackasses YOU'D befriend are doing what is patently criminal, after their trial and conviction, the death penalty should be administered immediately, preferably in a manner to suit their misdeeds... maybe the Waco killers could be burned to death, the drug cops given an OD of something, the GunWalker scum given to Mexican authorities, the ones who stomp kittens to death... well, you should get the picture.
248 posted on 01/05/2012 12:12:30 AM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Of course, maybe the Constitution isn't really on your list of things to conserve. Could THAT explain you? Hmmmm...
249 posted on 01/05/2012 12:16:15 AM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
thanks for your thoughtful comments.

It was a pleasure.

250 posted on 01/05/2012 1:55:25 AM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300301-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson