Skip to comments.
Gingrich: Congress can send Capitol Police to arrest rogue judges
The Hill ^
| December 18, 2011
| Alexander Bolton
Posted on 12/18/2011 12:34:01 PM PST by EveningStar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-317 next last
To: ProtectOurFreedom
.
I support newt one-hundred percenton this ...
Newt's proposal to NOT to arrest judges Nazi-Style ... but only if they have been Constitutionally FIRED by BOTH the Congress and the President ...
On one has ever said this (to my knowledge) ... BUT ... why do so many "conservative" judges go bad ?
Perhaps ... because of the STUPID life-long appoimtment, they have been successfully black-mailed ...
Just a thought ...
.
To: montag813
I think he’s a helluva lot smarter than you in these matters. If you’re going to impeach a rogue judge you’ll probably have to subpoena him. And if he refuses the subpoena you may have to compel him to appear. Who you gonna call?
42
posted on
12/18/2011 1:00:19 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: ez
Newt loves this country, has studied it intensely and he’s ready to take it back of long years of ignoring our foundation. No other conservative candidate has done that. Nothing against them but they don’t have what it takes, it’s as simple as that. Each one should bow out, IMO. IF they are truly conservative, it should be about our country first, not them.
Who could say he’s not conservative with a straight face? LOL! He’s the most conservative - he’s aware what can be done and should be done more than any conservative does and wants to get our country on the ‘right’ track. It certainly will upset the rino elite country club and their liberal counterparts.
To: Sans-Culotte
Nobody on FR will argue about activist judges being plenty and wrong. But, the remedy proposed is extra constitutional and typical of Newt. He wants to become the Czar of the United States. No thanks!!!
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Newt is a train wreck. We will get killed if e is the nominee.
45
posted on
12/18/2011 1:00:41 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: mnehring
I would like to see Dems use this power.
How is holding judges to constitutional ruling a bad thing?
Ruling strictly to the constitution is good for all. But I think you do not understand the issue.
46
posted on
12/18/2011 1:01:10 PM PST
by
wwcj
To: tennmountainman
It wasnt that long ago when the GOP held all three branches of Govt. Why wasnt it done then? When they had the power to do it, why wasnt done?They needed 60 votes in the senate.
47
posted on
12/18/2011 1:02:15 PM PST
by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
To: allendale
I see no problem with calling a Fed Judge to explain their ruling and how it complies with the US Constitution if Congress deems it to be off base.
“Because I said so” wouldn't be an acceptable answer for their nonsensical rulings like queer marriage and a number of others.
48
posted on
12/18/2011 1:02:23 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: tennmountainman
Ergo, the Tea Party was the result of these and a long host of other issues.
49
posted on
12/18/2011 1:02:31 PM PST
by
mazda77
(and I am a Native Texan)
To: allendale
Because he went through highschool back when we actually had to read the constitution.
50
posted on
12/18/2011 1:02:54 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Newt is running for Prez. He cannot subpeona judges.
Congress could vote to disestablish the entire lower court system tomorrow. It would be Constitutional. We are about 50 years late in reminding the lower courts that they exist at the pleasure of Congress.
51
posted on
12/18/2011 1:03:44 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: mnehring
To: wwcj
Holding the judges to the Constitution is a good thing.
Giving congress judicial powers to arrest isn’t nor is it Constitutional. Frankly, I think the subpoena powers Congress has are also stepping over the legal line.
53
posted on
12/18/2011 1:04:03 PM PST
by
mnehring
To: Patton@Bastogne
This was in response to Schieffer’s question “What if the judge ignores the subpoena?” Schieffer was trying hard to trip him up.
54
posted on
12/18/2011 1:04:11 PM PST
by
ez
(When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
To: Old Sarge
Depends on whether its a Liberal Congress sending them out to arrest a pro-Second Amendment judge (admittedly, a very rare species) or a Conservative Congress sending marshals to arrest a judge trying to degree voting rights for illegal aliens from the bench.
All things considered, this could be recipe for civil war.
55
posted on
12/18/2011 1:04:25 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: TBBT
Or if he doesn’t appear they can remove him in absentia. No problem really.
56
posted on
12/18/2011 1:04:38 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Sans-Culotte
Giving judges term limits as well as allowing voters to recall judges would help to end activist judge activities, too.
57
posted on
12/18/2011 1:05:46 PM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: indianrightwinger
But, the remedy proposed is extra constitutional and typical of Newt. He wants to become the Czar of the United States. No thanks!!!You are an idiot who has no idea what he is talking about. You better watch the clip before you display further ignorance.
58
posted on
12/18/2011 1:05:59 PM PST
by
ez
(When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
To: montag813
HOw about reading the article and you will know what he said and in the context of how it was said. Please do not comment on a headline, especially when it is the media creating it.
59
posted on
12/18/2011 1:06:24 PM PST
by
mazda77
(and I am a Native Texan)
To: OldNavyVet
Looks like Newt has actually read the constitution, and you have only read the headline written by a left wing journalist instead of addressing what Newt actually said.
60
posted on
12/18/2011 1:06:54 PM PST
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-317 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson