Posted on 11/08/2011 3:43:15 PM PST by JimWayne
I will not accept the legitimacy of any candidate who is acceptable to Karl Rove. Such candidates include Newt, Santorum and Perry apart from Romney. Karl Rove, note this very well: I would rather support NOBODY than support one of the candidates acceptable to you. Why, I would rather support even Ron Paul before I support your candidates!
We know exactly where you stand. You opposed the Tea Party candidates and supported Democrats in the 2010 elections. If you want GOP to get the support of people like me, it is your duty to make sure that Cain gets the nomination. I am tired of the dirty games played by you and your stooges, Perry and Romney. And to the supporters of any of the establishment candidates I have named, just as Karl Rove prefers Dims to Tea Party candidates, I too consider the RINOs to be worse than Ron Paul or the Dims. Get it?
You're off base on that one.
I started out with Bachmann but she has taken a beating so its Cain for me.
Besides, Cain is the only man in the race who can defeat Romney here in Michigan and more important, he can defeat Obama as well.
Yep. Rove is for Romney, Romney, and Romney. Not Newt or Perry.
Obama thanks you for your vote.....
Hmmmm ..?? I see Karl a lot on Fox, and I don’t recall him trashing Perry at all. While Karl may not be supporting Perry - that’s fine with me .. Karl can support whoever he wants.
I’m supporting Perry because he stated on Hannity’s TV program that the people Perry trusted most to give him advice were: John Bolton and Liz Cheney.
I’ve not heard any other candidate choose those two people - who I consider the most qualified people on the planet.
Tell him he is welcome. I prefer Hussein to the frauds. Better a wolf in wolf's clothing than a wolf in sheep's clothing. If you want to see the defeat of Hussein, it is for you to work to see that Cain gets the nomination. Tell your candidates to stop playing dirty games and sleeping with the liberals.
Your facts about who Rove supports are erroneous
Gotcha.
If you don't get your way, you would like to throw the race to Obama.
Never mind that you can't even spell Bachmann's name correctly.
OK. We've established that you are ignorant and wish to throw the race to Obama.
Have you any other wisdom to impart?
They are not erroneous. They are part of the same gang which is why they are/were in power and got along with Rove. Don’t try to fool us again.
I’m somewhat interested in Newt, but I’m afraid that, being a consummate politician, he would place too high a value on compromise rather than confrontation, which is what this country desperately needs.
But he has the smarts and he has the experience. If Cain goes belly-up I would certainly prefer Gingrich to Romney. Perry I don’t know yet.
Newt is a Global Warmist.
My candidates were Cain or Gingrich, but Gingrich is losing me by the way he is taking advantage of the false allegations against Cain. He is joining the MSM and Establishment in demanding that Cain “come clean” about the allegations.
Gingrich is now looking like an Establishment type (which he surely was in the past) and I get the impression that he knew that this was coming down on Cain.
.
yes.
rove is for romney.
and so is faux noos. hume, kraut, pe-rino, kristol et al act as if cain does not have a right to run. only “established” people should run.
except for hannity.
Absolutely not. Rove went after Perry after the 98 election.
He told Perry NOT to run an ad that he thought would hurt Bush with the hispanics. Perry ran it anyway.
The FACT is that the ROVE/BUSH cartel did everything they could to get Kay Bailey Hutchison to unseat Perry. The Washington insiders forgot that Texans were the ones that would choose their own Governor.
Correct. Just as you have been doing to us all these years. We are not morons. We noticed how KArl Rove sabotaged Christine O'Donnell's chances, how the NV Republican leader endorsed Sharon Angle's opponent and how your leaders got Murcowski to run as an independent. Buzz off, if you prefer Hussein to Tea Party candidates, I prefer Hussein to your RINOs. No loss there since Congress will not go to the Dims.
At what point did your hatred of Karl Rove become the most important factor in determining who gets your vote. Rove is a human being. Often wrong and at this point probably supporting either Perry or Romney. SO WHAT?? I can listen to Rove (along with everyone else who seeks to opine) and still make up my own mind. By your logic, voting on the basis of "nobody Rove supports" I would have voted for Gore and Kerry and Obama. Or simply stayed home and given them my vote by default.
My understanding is that Karl Rove was responsible for the strategy of recruiting the Democrat conservatives (so-called) and got Perry to defect from the Dims.
Any GOP current candidate is better than Obama. As Michael Savage just said on his radio show, he would vote for a dogcatcher over Obama (as long as the dogcatcher showed his birth cert and SSN).
To hand Obama the election because the GOP doesn’t have “the perfect” candidate is a grave mistake. Think about 1 or 2 more commies getting on the USSC, for example. That, alone, should make any conservative think twice about not voting for the GOP next year.
At the point when the dirtbag sabotaged the chances of the Tea Party candidates and helped radical liberals win in the 2010 elections. It boiled over when his stooges attacked Cain. Ask him to join the Dims if that is what he wants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.