[MNJohnnie]

Sorry until you address the question put to you, it is impossible to take your campaign-bot postings seriously

Where is the Perry Presidential agenda?

Slogans, speeches full of empty platitudes, and narcissistic cult of personality worship of his supposed record in Texas are not a Presidential agenda.

[wardaddy]

Slogans, speeches full of empty platitudes, and narcissistic cult of personality worship of his supposed record in Texas are not a Presidential agenda.

We just went through an evaporation that reminds me of your post...though a bit further north. I'm not happy with any of the front runners...I see potholes and holding my nose. Damned shame considering what is at stake

[DTxAg]

This isn’t your website, and you don’t get to dictate the terms of the discussion. Rick Perry’s record in Texas has been thoroughly examined and criticized.

Now that Cain is up and coming, the spotlight is shining on his record and the things he has said. You don’t like it, which is understandable. Hearing that the guy you support considers himself black before conservative can't be easy. That sort of thing normally belongs in the liberal camp. But all of your insults, name-calling, and immature behavior can't change the fact that Herman Cain's record will be examined, and you don't get to set limits on that discussion.

You can say that I can't be taken seriously. But I'm not the one who said it is OK for towns across America to ban mosques since that doesn't discriminate against any particular religion, Cain did. I'm not the one who said opposition to TARP was based on "economic illiteracy", Cain did. I'm not the one who said I am (insert race) before conservative, Cain did. We will continue to point out these things, and there's not a thing you can do about it.