Hmm... so I’m saying the jury was completely lacking in intelligence, you’re saying they were completely lacking in ethical standards of morality/behavior (ignoring the truth in favor of punishing prosecution behavior they didn’t like.)
There’s another option: Maybe it was six of one, and half a dozen of the other.
all 12 jurors?? who happen to believe in the death penalty which points a little more to them being conservative...which points a little more to them being in a higher intelligence bracket....so what are the chances that all 12 are complete morally bankrupt idiots?? You are “stat” man and you can’t do the math there??? ;0) Come on.... I hated statistics in college, but even I know the probability of that is close to nil..... And, in my experience, those types tend to be followers of what is “conventientional”...easy...road less traveled.... why would THEY come up with this verdict if they didn’t believe it?
Hmm... so I’m saying the jury was completely lacking in intelligence, you’re saying they were completely lacking in ethical standards of morality/behavior (ignoring the truth in favor of punishing prosecution behavior they didn’t like.)
There’s another option: Maybe it was six of one, and half a dozen of the other.
******************************
I am judging here and assuming, from listening to the 14th juror as my control.
Judging from him, I say yes, they were punishing, not judging facts.
I could be just as wrong as I feel they were—but that’s my opinion. I SEE the evidence and can’t find any other reason to ignore the evidence, other than what I believe at this point.
I can’t wrap my mind around such stupidity but vengeance—yeah, sure thang...