Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stat Man

all 12 jurors?? who happen to believe in the death penalty which points a little more to them being conservative...which points a little more to them being in a higher intelligence bracket....so what are the chances that all 12 are complete morally bankrupt idiots?? You are “stat” man and you can’t do the math there??? ;0) Come on.... I hated statistics in college, but even I know the probability of that is close to nil..... And, in my experience, those types tend to be followers of what is “conventientional”...easy...road less traveled.... why would THEY come up with this verdict if they didn’t believe it?


2,346 posted on 07/05/2011 11:36:34 PM PDT by DrewsMum (There is no other NAME whereby we may be saved....JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2332 | View Replies ]


To: DrewsMum
why would THEY come up with this verdict if they didn’t believe it?

Money, book deals.

2,348 posted on 07/05/2011 11:41:00 PM PDT by LowOiL ("Abomination" sure sounds like "ObamaNation" to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2346 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsMum

all 12 jurors?? who happen to believe in the death penalty which points a little more to them being conservative...
***************************
That is dishonest, I KNOW for a FACT that two of them were against the DP and Perry wouldn’t allow them to be dismissed.

I think you assume and paint too much with a wide brush....


2,357 posted on 07/05/2011 11:59:48 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2346 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsMum

“so what are the chances that all 12 are complete morally bankrupt idiots”

You misunderstood my post. My point was that they could be EITHER an idiot OR morally bankrupt (voting not guilty to punish the prosecution). Having “OR” as an option instead of “AND” makes an outcome MORE LIKELY, not LESS LIKELY.

“why would THEY come up with this verdict if they didn’t believe it?”
I think they did believe it. Therefore, I conclude they are “innumerate”, and have a poor understanding that a chain of unlikely events creates an impossibility. Lack of understanding this is a VERY COMMON fallacy that even otherwise intelligent people succumb to.

It was not my opinion that they were voting guilty to punish the prosecution. That was the opinion of another poster based on an interview with an alternate juror, which I did not see. In my post, I was simply pointing out that both of us could be right. While I believe most of the jurors just couldn’t do the math, maybe she’s right that one or two were just punishing the prosecution. (For what, I’m not sure. Making them miss their family’s 4th of July celebration?) I’m with you I don’t like to believe that, but I was being gracious and conceding the possibility, since I didn’t see the interview that opinion was based on.


2,399 posted on 07/06/2011 4:52:13 AM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2346 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson