Skip to comments.
Obama Renews Challenge to Political Ads
Wall Street Journal ^
| Aug 21. 2010
| MAYA JACKSON RANDALL
Posted on 08/21/2010 9:58:31 AM PDT by SmartInsight
President Barack Obama Saturday renewed his call for legislation that would require groups to reveal funding sources for political ads, saying Americans are already being overwhelmed by "a flood of attack ads run by shadowy groups."
In his weekly radio address, Mr. Obama said a Supreme Court decision gives corporations too much sway over elections and urged Republicans to stop blocking legislation he says would add more transparency to the election process.
Business groups such as the Chamber of Commerce argue that the bill placing new limits on political ads would violate free-speech rights, and they slam it as an unfair plan to discourage corporations from funding election efforts. And recently, Senate Republicans blocked the bill known as the Disclose Act.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; constitution; elections; freespeech; obama; scotus; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: SmartInsight
.......any other President of the US make threats to the citizenry?
21
posted on
08/21/2010 10:09:53 AM PDT
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: SmartInsight
Obama is a two-faced POS. And he has no respect for us...thinks we are so stupid that we don't see through his BS. Example: Union campaign money all goes to democrats, especially those dems who play footsie with the union leadership. Anyone notice that a large portion of the funds given to democrat campaigns is now coming indirectly from taxpayers (bailouts,etc.)? Here's one way they do it: Union leadership gives money to democrat campaign funds. Whoops, surprise, surprise...unions don't have enough money remaining to honor their pension and health care commitments.....no matter, Obama and his running dogs will bail out the unions with public funds. Aren't all you conservative republicans happy to be contributing to the democrats campaign funds through your tax dollars?? Ever wonder why the most frequent visitor to Obama’s white house these past few years was the head of the SEIU (Union)? Working out payback details. Using taxpayer money for campaigning is a federal crime....why are we tolerating it? Although convoluted, its not that hard to see!!!
________________________________________
22
posted on
08/21/2010 10:16:47 AM PDT
by
nuss
To: SmartInsight
President Barack Obama Saturday renewed his call for legislation that would require groups to reveal funding sources for political ads, saying Americans are already being overwhelmed by "a flood of attack ads run by shadowy groups." The Wee Wee really meant to say was that we need legislation that would require some groups to reveal funding sources for some political ads because some Americans are overwhelmed by "a flood of some attack ads run by some shadowy groups."
Fortunately, my minions are not shadowy ... and we never run any attack ads ... because we limit ourselves to telling the truth ... as we see it.
23
posted on
08/21/2010 10:17:12 AM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Mark Steyn: We're too broke to be this stupid)
To: Doogle
Not that I know of, this guy is in a league of his own on that regard I guess.
This guy knows only one thing: campaigning. He knows nor cares nothing about consensus or even simple notions about the will of the people. He is an elitist and a devout socialist, probably even an islamist syncophant. One character flaw will bring him down, his ego.
My fear is when he sees the end of his reign is over, either by time in office or by seeing his popularity drop to woeful levels, he will become more shrill. Aided by his pack of sheep in the Congress, he may try to become a dictator for life...which he is preparing for by packing the Supreme Court with fellow socialists and marxists. Note how his administration was so angry by what happened in Central America wherein a country tried to remove a dictatorial president king, they were strongly against the constitutional removal of the president trying to vacate his constitutional term of office.
24
posted on
08/21/2010 10:21:07 AM PDT
by
Mouton
To: John W
” Anyone gets a chance to see video of this, whats with his eyes? Very glassy, particularly the left one.”
For about 1 second - because he is so physically revolting to watch.
The greenish tinged , sweaty skin, the horse teeth, the curling purple lips and the nostrils in the air .
And now his left eye looks like it’s crossed and both eyes look like they are rolling around in his head like some cartoon character .
To: SmartInsight
26
posted on
08/21/2010 10:31:07 AM PDT
by
Shady
(No more laws based on LIES!)
To: SmartInsight
In his weekly radio address, Mr. Obama said a Supreme Court decision gives corporations too much sway over elections and urged Republicans to stop blocking legislation he says would add more transparency to the election process.Everytime I see Obama and transparency used in the same sentence, I throw up a little bit in my mouth.
27
posted on
08/21/2010 10:31:23 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/)
To: nuss
Aren't all you conservative republicans happy to be contributing to the democrats campaign funds through your tax dollars?? Tickled f***ing pink! Matter of fact, I just looked in the mirror, I am red as a beet.
28
posted on
08/21/2010 10:40:16 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Get drinking water from your ditch - http://www.junglebucket.com/)
To: Minn
...or does all pending legislation die when a new congress starts? That's the right answer.
29
posted on
08/21/2010 10:42:39 AM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Artcore
“You mean like SEIU and ACORN?”
and the hundreds of little acorns that have fallen......
30
posted on
08/21/2010 10:48:02 AM PDT
by
malia
To: SmartInsight
Maybe just a coincidence, but funny how Pelosi was just talking about investigating the anti-mosque people.
31
posted on
08/21/2010 10:56:49 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
To: SmartInsight
‘flood of attack ads run by shadowy groups.”
REALLY, and tell us Zero, just what criteria do you use to come to this conclusion.
Your NOT Fuhrer YET. So cool it. Running a political comittee out of the WH is illegal, just ask Nixon. oh yeah he’s dead.
32
posted on
08/21/2010 11:12:26 AM PDT
by
Marty62
(marty60)
To: SmartInsight
What about all the offshore Saudi and indonesian money that elected him?
33
posted on
08/21/2010 11:29:21 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
To: 506Lake; AdvisorB; afraidfortherepublic; antivenom; angry elephant; Bernard; Blonde; ...
|
To be added or removed from the "The Wall Street Journal" Ping List, FReepmail GOP_Lady. |
34
posted on
08/21/2010 11:58:40 AM PDT
by
GOP_Lady
To: SmartInsight; All
To: SunTzuWu
I’d like to know the source of Dem funding and suspect much of it is US taxpayers. That said, if Null Set gooses congress into passing something, it will force for profit corporations to reveal all and the shadowy non-profits will remain as opaque as ever. Personally, I’d like a completely clear chain of funding shown for everything, but will not hold my breath.
36
posted on
08/21/2010 1:00:49 PM PDT
by
FreeStateYank
(I want my country and constitution back, now!)
To: Artcore
You mean like SEIU and ACORN? Plus the UAW and the teachers unions.
To: SmartInsight
President Barack Obama Saturday renewed his call for legislation that would require groups to reveal funding sources for political ads, saying Americans are already being overwhelmed by "a flood of attack ads run by shadowy groups." Oh yeah? Like his shadowy funding by communists and islamists from Arabia?
38
posted on
08/21/2010 2:22:38 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrates Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: SmartInsight
Tell the unions to go first. Corporations will follow if the unions lead the way. /sarcasm
39
posted on
08/21/2010 2:24:47 PM PDT
by
comps4spice
(Obama is a clear and present danger.)
To: SmartInsight
What a coward. Obama and the Rats are running scared. They are afraid of being held accountable for their record. Well, Obama can stick it where the sun doesn't shine. Americans are no longer buying the BS his socialist buddies and he are pedaling.
40
posted on
08/21/2010 2:30:51 PM PDT
by
KansasGirl
(No, I do not proofread.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson