Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitution Butchers: Stop Pelosi's Slaughter House
michellemalkin.com ^ | March 13, 2010 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/14/2010 2:56:12 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

Via Doug Ross:

In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House “deems” the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.

Thus, Slaughter is preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill “passed” once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes. Democrats would thereby avoid a direct vote on the health care bill while allowing it to become law!

Constitutional attorney Mark R. Levin asks, “They’re going to present a rule, issued by her committee as chairman, that says that the House already adopted the Senate bill when we know it didn’t?”

U.S Constitution, Article I, Section VII, Clause II.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively…

According to Levin, James Madison himself gave special care and attention to this clause in the Constitution.

Levin: And do you want to know why? Because this clause goes to the heart of this Republic.

This clause goes to the heart of how our representative body, that is Congress, makes laws. And so I want you to [observe] how particular the Framers were… They have to pass a Bill to present it to the President…

This is one of the most exacting clauses in the Constitution.

And, to the best of my knowledge, which extends over three decades, no Congress has previously tried to institute policies without actual statutes.

Here we have the President of the United States and Congressional leaders actually talking about the possibility of a brazen and open violation of one of the most fundamental aspects of our Constitution and Republic! How we actually make laws!

Let me be as clear as I know how. If this is done, this will create the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War. It would be 100 times worse than Watergate.

…It would be government by fiat… meaning there would be no law… the mere discussion by officials in this government is such a grotesque violation of the actual legislative function of Congress [that it] puts us… at the brink. At the brink.

This is why we conservatives revere the Constitution. This is why we stress the Constitution’s words have meaning and historical context and must be complied with. Because otherwise we have anarchy, which leads to tyranny.

This is a crucial lesson for those of you who… aren’t sure what your beliefs are, or if you have any beliefs. Or aren’t sure if you even care. We have an effort underway by the one of the most powerful chairmen in Congress, the woman who heads the Rules Committee, …openly discussing gutting Congress. Gutting Congress.



TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; congress; democratcongress; democratcorruption; democrats; healthcare; levin; liberalfascism; malkin; marklevin; michellemalkin; mullahnancy; mullahpelosi; nancybinpelosi; nancypelosi; obamacare; pelosi; rapeofliberty; slaughter; slaughterhouse; slaughterslaughter; slaughtersolution; socialisthealthcare; standdown; tyranny; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: BarnacleCenturion

I’m hearing a lot on the news about people opening up their mail and finding increases in their health insurance bills. Has there been any research done or any indications that the White House has made any kind of deal with the health insurance companies to raise the rates at this time in order to use the rate raises as propaganda for passing the Unhealthy Bill? It would make perfect sense, if the bill is passed and everyone is forced to have insurance who would benefit from the increased amount of customers? Why the health insurance companies, duh!!! It makes perfect sense that a behind closed doors meeting between O and the insurance companies would come up with this kind of “Chicago politics” style solution to getting his bill passed.


21 posted on 03/14/2010 3:24:52 PM PDT by harrym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Mark Levin: “This is one of the most exacting clauses in the Constitution.”

So is the natural born citizen’s clause. Malkin and Levin don’t seem to care about that one. If that one had been followed we wouldn’t be in the mess right now. Remove the usurper.


22 posted on 03/14/2010 3:25:05 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling

From listening to people talk in stores, restaurants and other places, I have the feeling that it won’t be long and there will be a repeat of the 1770’s


23 posted on 03/14/2010 3:25:09 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

Well then...its civil war. No?


24 posted on 03/14/2010 3:25:12 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

elected via election fraud.. This explains why Obama/Holder stopped the ACORN investigation prior to the Slaughter Solution tactic.. Freeing-up ACORN is the green light that ensures Obama’s re-election no matter how many unconstitutional tactics they employ.


25 posted on 03/14/2010 3:26:24 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I all respect..that would mean then that there is no constitution and we all can do whatever the hell we want.


26 posted on 03/14/2010 3:27:06 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: timetostand

Does anyone participating on FR still believe any longer that Obama is simply misguided, ill-advised, or incompetent to rationalize away that he is a socialist or Marxist ideologue with a deliberate game plan to impose a totalitarian agends on America?


27 posted on 03/14/2010 3:28:03 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
"If this is done, this will create the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War. It would be 100 times worse than Watergate.

…It would be government by fiat… meaning there would be no law…the mere discussion by officials in this government is such a grotesque violation of the actual legislative function of Congress [that it] puts us… at the brink. At the brink."

Mark Levin

------------------------------------------------------------

We are truly at the brink, folks. If Congress does this, all bets are off. The Constitution will have been not just subverted by smooth deceit or by trickery, it will have been blatantly, and overtly abrogated in the full light of day.

Should they do this, it will be the opening shot of the Second American Revolution.

28 posted on 03/14/2010 3:28:51 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Even if this is a trial baloon, we should never forget it.


29 posted on 03/14/2010 3:31:42 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Weakening McCain strengthens our borders, weakens guest worker aka amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
Stop them how? We have tried everything short of Civil War!

I'm hoping the words "Duty, Honor, Country" really mean something to a bunch of ring knockers. If not, the country is doomed to collapse and/or civil war.
30 posted on 03/14/2010 3:32:38 PM PDT by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

“But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill”

The Constitution doesn’t say the rule, it says “the bill”. This would be deemed as unconstitutional as they come without a constitutional amendment saying they can vote only on the rule.


31 posted on 03/14/2010 3:32:59 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
This is truly getting worse and worse. There is no longer a Democratic Party in this country, there is the American Fascist Party, formerly known as the Democratic Party.

After all, if the House can "deem" one bill passed, why not simply enact a rule that deems all bills passed by the Senate as, pro tanto, passed by the House? Gets rid of the need to make all those pesky House votes - more time to spend out on the town with your leftist/liberal union overlords and swilling expensive booze at taxpayer expense - and certainly streamlines the whole legislation thingy.

In fact, why not have both houses enact a procedural rule pursuant to which any bill that the president signs be "deemed" to have been passed by a majority of the House and a majority of the Senate, respectively?

The fact of the matter is, if those two scenarios seem ludicrously unconstitutional, then so is the Slaughter Rule. The fact that the fascists, I mean democrats, would even spend more than a moment's time considering such a patently unconstitutional measure should indicate to all but the willfully blind that they have chosen to follow in the footsteps of Hugo Chavez, not our Founders.


32 posted on 03/14/2010 3:33:24 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techno

He has and is following the Nazi plan to a tea. Just go on back an read how the Nazis gained power in Germany. It is exactly the way they are doing it here.

Everyone thinks of the Nazis as jack booted thugs who roamed the streets beating the hell out of everyone that stood in their way. Well. it was that way but, they gained power by legal means by making a deal with liberal democrats to obtain control of the country. Then they double crossed the liberal democrats and took over-the rest is history.

Put the blue dog democrats in the place of the German Liberal Democrats of the 30s and you have a perfect fit.

Pelosi and Obama will make a deal with the blue dogs, then double cross them and will cancel all elections. At least they will try...


33 posted on 03/14/2010 3:33:46 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

Stop them how? We have tried everything short of Civil War!


It may come to that


34 posted on 03/14/2010 3:39:01 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Soylent Green, You Tube has many more scenes...worth watching a few.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MjoPzQUKCU&NR=1

Defeat Obamacare call list: List now contains the new MAYBES culled from FR posts. Be sure to call KNOWN RINOS too.

KEEP THE CALLS UP! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE

Code Red” - House Target List on Health Care

The National Republican Congressional Committee has published a target list on health care. In addition to continuing to contact the five Tennessee Democrat Congressmen, you can go http://www.votervoice.net/link/clickthrough/ext/94697.aspx to contact some of these targets. Much of the talk following Obama’s announcement has focused on how to defeat this second bill through reconciliation, but that is misleading because the first step to defeating Obamacare is not by concentrating on defeating the “fixer” bill but by defeating the Senate bill in the House when it goes to the floor for an up-or-down vote on Thursday, March 18th.

Rep. Lincoln Davis 202-225-6831 Columbia office: 931-490-8699
Rep. Jim Cooper 202-225-4311 Nashville office: 615-736-5295
Rep. Bart Gordon 202-225-4231 Murfreesboro office: 615-896-1986
John Tanner (202) 225-4714, Union City, (731) 885-7070, Jackson Phone: (731) 423-4848, Millington (901) 873-5690 TN (MAYBE)
Rep. Steve Cohen 202-225-3265 Memphis office: 901-544-4131
Harry Mitchell (202) 225-2190 (480) 946-2411 AZ 5th District
Gabrielle Giffords (202) 225-2542 (520) 881-3588 AZ 8th District
Ann Kirkpatrick (202) 225-2315 (928) 226-6914 AZ 1st District
Jerry McNerney (202) 225-1947 925-833-0643 CA 11th District
John Salazar 202-225-4761 970-245-7107 CO 3rd District
Jim Himes (202) 225-5541 (866) 453-0028 CT 4th District
Alan Grayson (202) 225-2176 (407) 841-1757 FL 8th District
Bill Foster (202) 225-2976 630-406-1114 IL 14th District
Baron Hill 202 225 5315 812 288 3999 IN 9th District
Mark Schauer (202) 225-6276 (517) 780-9075 MI 7th District
Gary Peters (202) 225-5802 (248) 273-4227 MI 9th District
Dina Titus (202) 225-3252 702-256-DINA (3462) NV 3rd District
Carol Shea-Porter (202) 225-5456 (603) 743-4813 NH 1st District
Tim Bishop (202) 225-3826 (631) 696-6500 NY 1st District
John Hall (202) 225-5441 (845) 225-3641 x49371 NY 19th District
Bill Owens (202) 225-4611 (315) 782-3150 NY 23rd District
James Matheson Toll-Free Number 1 (877) 677-9743 (202) 225-3011Mike Arcuri (202)225-3665 (315)793-8146 NY 24th District
Dan Maffei (202) 225-3701 (315) 423-5657 NY 25th District
Earl Pomeroy (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355 ND At-Large District
Steven Driehaus (202) 225-2216 (513) 684-2723 OH 1st District
Mary Jo Kilroy (202) 225-2015 (614) 294-2196 OH 15th District
Zach Space (202) 225-6265 (330) 364-4300 OH 18th District
Kathy Dahlkemper (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038 PA 3rd District
Patrick Murphy (202) 225-4276 (215) 826-1963 PA 8th District
Christopher Carney (202) 225-3731 (570) 585-9988 PA 10th District
Paul Kanjorski (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200 PA 11th District
John Spratt (202) 225-5501 (803)327-1114 SC 5th District
Tom Perriello (202) 225-4711 (276) 656-2291 VA 5th District
Alan Mollohan (202) 225-4172 (304) 623-4422 WVA 1st District
Nick Rahall (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000 WVA 3rd District
Steve Kagen (202) 225-5665 (920) 437-1954 WI 8th District
Bart Stupak (202) 225 4735 MI (MAYBE)
Brian Baird (202) 225-3536, Vancouver, (360) 695-6292. Olympia, (360) 352-9768, (MAYBE)
senator mark begich (202) 224-3004 toll free. (877) 501 - 6275 just became a MAYBE
Jason Altmire 202-225-2565, Aliquippa, 724-378-0928,
Natrona Heights, 724-226-1304 (MAYBE)

On the Bubble (Major developments from the “yes” and “no” columns in the House)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2467046/posts

Congressional Dems on Twitter
http://www.arrghpaine.com/congressional-dems-on-twitter

And here are toll-free numbers we can use to call any Senators or Reps.
At the first number below you must wait through a tape recording urging you to tell your Rep or Senator to vote “yes” for the health care bill. Just hang on and when the recording is over, you will get the Capitol operator. Just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office. Then you will either talk to an aid or have the chance to leave a message for him/her to vote NO on the health care bill.

When you use the second number and the Capitol operator comes on, just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office. Every time I use this number I get the Rep or Senator’s answer machine, so it may be set up that way all the time...to go to their answer machine. Either way you can leave a message to vote NO on the health care bill!

We need to use these toll free numbers that have been set up for the health care/ BO supporters and illegals to use! After all they are FREE!
1-800-828-0498
1-866-220-0044


35 posted on 03/14/2010 3:39:50 PM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Some say that we need a third party. I don’t agree, we have other parties that we can support so what kind of party do those so eager want? I submit to you that it isn’t the two main political parties that have fallen by the wayside that are the problem, but it is the controlling inhabitants therein that are the problem. In 1789 an article was (I think) in the letters to an American farmer which basically read-“Woe to us if we should let lawyers into the halls of government, as they will become so numerous, like weeds in a garden, in which no-one will be able to sort out the good from the bad.” Paraphrasing.

My plea.

There stands the Banner, under who’s waving thousands have gone before to defend.

It is to OUR shame that we have allowed her glory to be stained with political immorality, greed, corruption and lust for power over those who would fight for her preservation.

It is we who shall hold her high for God, Individual and Liberty. Our charge is to be Duty, Honor and Country.
Duty, to defend her with our divinely instituted CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

With Honor, to those who have died and suffered defending life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. To go before him who holds us to our destiny to defend our country against ALL forms of tyranny. Who should enjoy liberty if we would have no allegiance to our Creator and Country?

The spirits of our founders have broken forth from their graves. They are roaming to and fro throughout this nation crying out to us and in their pleading they cry; “WE WARNED YOU! DO NOT FAIL US!”

Therefore we must go forth and oppose those who would institute such a tyranny upon this nation and we must oppose it by whatever means at hand.

Written by me April 12th 2009.


36 posted on 03/14/2010 3:40:12 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

That piece is to be used only by my graces.


37 posted on 03/14/2010 3:42:11 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

“You go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, you go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in. But we’re going to get health care reform passed for the American people.”

Pelosi wasn’t kidding. She and Slaughter both should be arrested when they try to pull this maneuver.


38 posted on 03/14/2010 3:42:21 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (STOP the Tyrananny State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harrym; ExTexasRedhead

We found a DECREASE in hubby’s Navy retirement check starting in Jan. Wait until the MEDICARE/SS/MEDICAID and TRICARE for Life (health ins for over 65 retired Military) hits.


39 posted on 03/14/2010 3:42:42 PM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: techno

“This is why I have to laugh at the folks that suggest Obama will not run for re-election.”

I laugh at the suggestion too....but only because I don’t expect he’s going to need to.


40 posted on 03/14/2010 3:43:22 PM PDT by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson