Posted on 01/29/2010 11:25:34 PM PST by neverdem
How could Bummer possibly do something that sensible?
One new nuclear power plant per million in population would be my goal !
Coal is a better way to go! Oh yeah, he has to pump the unions and GE.
http://www.brayincandy.com/id206.html
Pray for Ameirca’s Freedom
He knows that the EPA won’t allow it.
France has many nuclear plants and the HDTV’s are around 1,000 euros cheaper to buy.
I was almost going to buy one and have it trucked but then I figured I would have to deal with a French person.
(Don’t Worry Be Happy, is playing on the HDTV right now - lol)
Umm because he is so confused he doesn't realize that there is no way to stop conservatives from saying "See, we've been right for 50 years" and taking every bit of the credit for nuclear power leaving the progressives with nothing to show for 50 years of obstruction?
By lying out both sides of his mouth?
The right tongue fork giveth, and the left tongue fork taketh away. Blessed be the forked tongue!
Promise this, but let OMB chop DOE’s nuke budget.
Promise this, but kill Yucca Mtn deader than it already is, so EPA can say “no havee ‘permanent’ storage, no makee waste!”
Anything and everything Obama does is the opposit of the right thing to do.
Besides it would only speak French.
Paulson: Crazy Putin Pushed China To Dump Fannie Bonds And Crush The U.S. Financial System
Ozone Hole Healing Could Cause Further Climate Warming
The ozone hole did it CFCs that caused the ozone hole also caused global warming, NOT CO2, FWIW.
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
1000 euros cheaper? Wow!
How are they managing it?
Subsidies?
Wow! I knew the French used a recycling technology for their fuel rods, but I had no idea it was so efficient. Why the hell don't we do that?
Obama got a lot of money from the nuclear power industry when he was in Illinois, and even if by some remote possibility Obama is serious about wanting more nuclear plants, he’s dreaming if he thinks the rest of the Democrat powers that be won’t skin him alive if he actually tries to get more nuclear plants.
Cause, it is the only thing that can be done efficiently (Hydro, Nuclear or Other); and as all low life politicians wanting to get out in front as if they are leading, see their chance. For the last 25 years the U.S. political class has soaked the public with non-nuclear and can no longer do so…because unless we sell the advancing countries Coal/Oil and for them to burn Coal/Oil we derive a benefit, something they do not want to do. China has committed to the biggest single Hydro-electric system to date, plus going nuclear and will be self-sufficient by 2025!
But again that makes too much sense. Who slipped the Thorazine into Bummer’s cocktail?
At least partly because or cheap efficient reliable energy.
I’m suspicious.
There were fears that terrorists or rogue states might make off with the concentrated fuel to create dirty bombs or nuclear weapons. With modern developments, it sounds like such theft would be the hard way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.