Posted on 01/05/2010 8:29:59 AM PST by rhema
Our winner [of the worst person in the world gold award]: John W. Whitehead, the founder of The Rutherford Institute....Whitehead wants [Congressman Tom] Perriello to move his office to make it easier for the tea baggers to protest and threaten him....John "you-want-that-we-should-carry-your-signs-for-you-too-because-they-are-so-heavy" Whitehead of The Rutherford...Institute...today's worst person in the world.--Keith Olbermann, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann," MSNBC (Dec. 14, 2009)
Who is the worst person in the world? Keith Olbermann, host of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann, has actually named me the "worst person in the world" for coming to the defense of political protesters who believed their First Amendment rights were being restricted.
It gets better. Not only was I dubbed the so-called "worst" person in the world for defending free speech, but Olbermann actually ranked my behavior more reprehensible than that of (in his view) corrupt politicians and heartless government administrators.
What exactly did I do to deserve this dubious honor?
On December 10, 2009, I sent a letter to Congressman Tom Perriello (D-VA) voicing my concern that the location of his Charlottesville office in a downtown office complex interferes with his constituents' First Amendment rights. The issue arose after The Rutherford Institute was contacted by representatives of the Jefferson Area Tea Party and the University of Virginia College Republicans. These groups had been prohibited from engaging in peaceful petitioning activities at Perriello's office. These individuals were also informed that they would be deemed trespassers if they dared to demonstrate on political issues while in the parking lot to Perriello's office complex. The College Republicans were actually met by the police and informed that they could not have access to the parking lot.
As I pointed out in my letter, Perriello's decision to locate his office in a place where public petitioning and demonstrations may be restricted by those protecting their private property interests is at odds with his constituents' rights to peacefully protest. Thus, I urged the congressman after his lease runs out to relocate his headquarters to a location where citizens' rights to petition and demonstrate will not be squelched by private property concerns. In my mind, relocation could be a win-win for all involved. It would not only further the salutary purposes of the First Amendment but would serve to alleviate any conflict between these activities and the rights of private property owners who may be inconvenienced by the presence of demonstrations.
Incredibly, my suggestion landed me in the center of a firestorm over free speech that is raging still. It also resulted in my being honored with Olbermann's "worst person" award, which I accepted with great humility. After all, how could I take issue with being recognized for standing up for free speech?
If anyone should understand about the nature of free speech, it should be Keith Olbermann. I have watched his show on MSNBC a number of times, and he is a living, breathing--and dare I say bombastic--example of one who fully exercises his right to free speech by attacking those whose politics run counter to his own.
Unfortunately, Olbermann seems to suffer from an all-too-common malady, what I call "free-speech-for-me-but-not-for-thee syndrome." His diatribe against me, riddled with inaccuracies and partisan potshots, is emblematic of everything that is wrong with politics and, it must be said, the unpleasant and mindless noise that is television journalism today.
Olbermann, a mouthpiece for the liberal left, is not unlike his extreme right-wing counterparts in his intolerance for that which runs counter to his political beliefs. This is where the right and left converge and become almost mirror images of the same totalitarian mindset.
Increasingly, I find myself facing off against individuals who claim to champion free speech and yet see nothing wrong with silencing those with whom they disagree. The American Civil Liberties Union, that once-great champion of free speech, is a perfect example. Back in 1970, the ACLU fell under public disfavor, especially among its donors, when they defended the right of a group of Neo-Nazis to march in a town's parade. Fast forward to 2009 and the ACLU has switched sides. They are now pushing a campaign to oppose "extremism," which according to their website, seems to be anything that is promoting a Christian viewpoint in the public schools.
We would all do well to remember what the great French dissident and writer Voltaire once observed, "I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." I've been a constitutional lawyer for more than 30 years, and I can tell you that you don't have to agree with the people you defend as long as they are exercising their free speech.
Frankly, we need more--not less--people exercising their rights, because the Constitution is on life support. One by one, its vital systems are shutting down. The first to come under attack was the Fourth Amendment, which was greatly weakened by the Bush administration and continues to be undermined by the Obama administration. Yet it is the First Amendment which is being barraged by forces beyond the government, ranging from political correctness to intolerance of "extremism," whatever that is deemed to be.
The worst part of all, however, is that the American people, ignorant about their rights, are equally unaware that the document which Abraham Lincoln called "the only safeguard of our liberties" is being whittled away. I fear that if the American people don't become informed and vigorously assert their rights soon, one morning we're all going to wake up and find ourselves living in a police state.
So, to Keith Olbermann, I say thank you very much for giving me a golden opportunity to highlight what is happening to our rights and what free speech is really all about. I hope that someday you will be as avid about protecting free speech as the one to whom you conferred the gold award for the "worst person in the world."
I only pray that NBC doesn’t bring him back for Sunday night football. He really ruins it for me and I end up switching channels when he’s on.
And what does this say for the people he works for? It always goes back to the boss doesn’t it?
Keith, you are biggest of the many State Media DOUCHE-BAGGERS!
[Keith Olbermann pursues relentless quest for moronic irrelevancy]
But, he achieves that instantly every time he opens his mouth. His pursuit is long over. I suggest many years of rest in irrelevant retirement.
KO is a stinking turd.
I cannot imagine that there is ANYone who actually cares what Olberman thinks or says. He is crass and a bit insane- an observation easily seen by anyone who catches one of his diatribes on another news show (like Fox). To be called names by one such as this would, I believe, mean nothing. More than anything else, Olberman and those like him highlight the complete lack of anything commendable on the left and never fail to convince me that my right-wing viewpoints are correct.
U R too kind.....He has won the race already...
Let’s subject this to what I like to call “The Bizarro-World Test”!
To achieve this, we simply reverse the political affiliations of all of the parties involved in a given situation. For this particular case, we will now have a republican politician and liberals/leftists who wish to freely protest against him at his office.
If, in the above scenario, Keith Olbermann would STILL rate Mr. Whitehead as “the worst person in the world”, then he is NOT a hypocrite.
See! I KNEW Olbermann was a hypocrite!
So do I. I simply CANNOT watch, even if my favorite team is playing.
Yes.
In fact, he’s a stinking, Baby Ruth candy-bar-shaped turd, floating in the punch bowl of our society.
Yeah, Keith Olberman, a leftist gasbag. In his quest to get noticed he becomes increasingly shrill (if that’s possible) and even more unhinged. Keith Olberman... pffft... yeah, whatever.
Olberman has wet dreams about being the lap dog of tyrants.
And here I thought it was Chris Mathews ....
Bill Mahr for me.
Well, yeah, except that a douche bag does have a legitimate function.
Oh yeah, him too .....
Whitehead is correct, and those who so vociferously opposed Bush's "Patriot Act" now should likewise oppose this Administration's coziness with such "useful idiots" as Olberman who intimidate and belittle citizens who exercise their God-given rights of conscience and freedom of expression, as protected by their Constitution.
Whitehead's work on behalf of restoring the Founders' ideas has been going on for decades. Olberman's ignorance of those ideas, and his embrace of the counterfeit ideas of tyranny are appalling, but typical of Far Left spokespersons in the elitist media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.