Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

90% Tax? Now We Really ARE Screwed (Populist Rage Tax - on AIG Bonuses)
Businessinsider.com ^ | Mar. 19, 2009, 10:01 PM | Henry Blodget

Posted on 03/20/2009 1:00:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

The frantic passage of the Populist Rage Tax was a new low in the US government's response to this crisis.  It shows just how likely we are to doom ourselves to a decade or more of misery--by choking our markets, closing our borders, turning our banks into tools of social policy, and wrecking what's left of our economy.

In case you've been too outraged by AIG (justifiably) to notice what happened, here's a recap:

If the "TARP bonus" bill the House passed today becomes law, any of the hundreds of thousands of people who work for Citigroup, Bank of America, AIG, and nine other major US corporations will have to fork over 90 cents of every bonus dollar that puts their household income over $250,000.

That's household income, not individual income.  If you're married and filing singly, you'll have to surrender anything over $125,000.  Indefinitely.*  [See the comments below for a discussion of the mechanics of this.]

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; aig; economy; obama; populistragetax; taxincrease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2009 1:00:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

More accurately: ‘Mob Rule Tax’.


2 posted on 03/20/2009 1:01:59 PM PDT by DGHoodini (God's gonna getcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I heard the Senate put the kibosh on the bill.


3 posted on 03/20/2009 1:02:50 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How long until they expand the 90% tax to anyone making over a certain threshold figure? And then continue moving down the income charts until they completely collapse the economy?

Slippery slopes...


4 posted on 03/20/2009 1:03:07 PM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

That might be the plan...for Ayers and crew...I doubt he would be upset.


5 posted on 03/20/2009 1:06:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (What happened to my IRAs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“every bonus dollar that puts their household income over $250,000.”

I’d venture to say that a lot of them make over $250,000 in regular salary. So anyone getting any bonus, not just these top guys, would get screwed by this bill for any amount of bonus. This isn’t just targeting a few guys at the top.


6 posted on 03/20/2009 1:08:18 PM PDT by Marmolade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Just saw this thread:

How The Socialists [Marxists, Keynesians] Are Destroying America From Within

7 posted on 03/20/2009 1:08:29 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (What happened to my IRAs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

How about a 90% tax on anyone that served in Government that becomes a multy millionaire while serving or after.
Anything over $250K will be taxed at 90%.

Anyone in Hollywood that is paid over $250k for a movie will be taxed at a 90% rate...


8 posted on 03/20/2009 1:08:46 PM PDT by Holicheese (Gimme Gimme Gimme!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

Politicians who accept bribes in the form of book advances or futures market profits should be taxed at a 90% rate.


9 posted on 03/20/2009 1:13:44 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Demagoguery is NOT populism.
10 posted on 03/20/2009 1:14:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This has went on far too long.


11 posted on 03/20/2009 1:15:39 PM PDT by Maelstorm ("I don't want them punished with a baby," -Barack Obama on Daughter's getting pregnant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Bolsheviks started with the Kulaks. Then they redifined the word until anyone who had the money to buy enough food was a Kulak.


12 posted on 03/20/2009 1:16:53 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
If the "TARP bonus" bill the House passed today becomes law, any of the hundreds of thousands of people who work for Citigroup, Bank of America, AIG, and nine other major US corporations will have to fork over 90 cents of every bonus dollar that puts their household income over $250,000. That's household income, not individual income. If you're married and filing singly, you'll have to surrender anything over $125,000. Indefinitely.
Thanks Ernest. Wrap the body in a TARP and bury it at sea.
13 posted on 03/20/2009 1:22:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That's household income, not individual income. If you're married and filing singly, you'll have to surrender anything over $125,000. Indefinitely.*

Well, its only indefinite... if the company plans to take government bailout money indefinitely.

It does not apply to companies *not* suckling on the government's teat.

That said, I think it's stupid to penalize the successful employees of a bailed-out company. After all, these bonuses are meant to reward those that actually earned the companies' some profit. Those that cost the companies' their money probably aren't getting anything.

Which means there is no incentive to go the extra mile anyone. Which'll prolong the length of time these companies will require bailout money.

Which is stupid.

14 posted on 03/20/2009 1:26:17 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Well, its only indefinite... if the company plans to take government bailout money indefinitely.

It does not apply to companies *not* suckling on the government’s teat.


YET


15 posted on 03/20/2009 1:28:31 PM PDT by boxerblues (Party like its 1773)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The law of unintended consequences bits hard.

The Gov people are not smart enough to catch and keep rich folks money. There will always be loopholes and a way to keep WHAT IS THEIRS.


16 posted on 03/20/2009 1:31:00 PM PDT by BillT (New Executive Order to abolish the WS Constitution to be signed to save the US Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I thought the Congressional followers of the Liberal Messiah didn’t read the Constitution. Now I realize they are reading it in order to find ever more creative ways to violate it.


17 posted on 03/20/2009 1:40:46 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

See the link at post #7...


18 posted on 03/20/2009 1:43:35 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (What happened to my IRAs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If this works that way, they should have written the tax as a surcharge on the large bonuses.


19 posted on 03/20/2009 1:58:15 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
YET

Uh, huh. Tomorrow, and tomorrow and tomorrow...a little less than four glorious years of tomorrows at this point.

20 posted on 03/20/2009 2:01:09 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson