Check out this comment from your link:
Of course legal experts say that this has little chance of succeeding. They have made careers and became wealthy from the negation the Constitution.
Furthermore, why would the SCOTUS stand up for the Constitution. They have been raping it for decades. Find things in it that aren’t there. And, not finding things in it that are there.
Even Scalia is as two-faced as the rest of those ingrates.
While all of this is legitimate as far as I am concerned, those frauds in black robes won’t do what is right and just. They will go through the motions—proffer loads of swamp gas and that will be it. Another part of the Constitution destroyed.
8 posted on Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:22:38 PM by Parmy
Well, let’s just say that four of the justices currently on the Supreme Court are liberal activists, who give less than a damn what the Constitution says.
Four of them do give a damn, I think. And one, Stevens, is a swing vote, who tends to vote the way that will make him most popular on the DC cocktail circuit, but actually not quite all of the time. I think possibly Stevens still has a conscience.
I think the article is in error on one point, however. Others have said that it only takes 4 votes to put it on the docket, not 5. Although once on the docket, it will take 5 votes for the Court to act.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QdyLOUHz-A&feature=related
I expect that the Axelrod goonsquad will be sending their army out over the weekend to try and create the image that this is kookery ... astroturfing of the worst kind don'tchaknow. criminal bastards