Replies

Lou, because the issue is heating up now that SCOTUS will take it in conference Friday, it is good to note that the forgery posted on Obama's website has been admitted to and is now a confiremed forgery. I've been challenged a couple of times at FR to prodcue proof the document was forged and the best proof is the admission of the two who fabrciated it! Here for your files is a Youtube with links to follow which explain the facts very well and names the forgers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QdyLOUHz-A&feature=related

I expect that the Axelrod goonsquad will be sending their army out over the weekend to try and create the image that this is kookery ... astroturfing of the worst kind don'tchaknow. criminal bastards

Thank you, MHGinTN. Ping to #393:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2142619/posts?page=393#393

Adding links in case anyone missed them.

Profound comments:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2142619/posts?page=86#86

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2142619/posts?page=100#100

... and Barack Obama, Jr, was a British Citizen from his father at birth... it even says so on his website ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2142619/posts?page=285#285

From Leo's letter to ABC issued today:

The main argument of my law suit alleges that since Obama was a British citizen - at birth - a fact he admits is true, then he cannot be a “natural born citizen”. The word “born” has meaning. It deals with the status of a presidential candidate “at birth”. Obama had dual nationality at birth. The status of the candidate at the time of the election is not as relevant to the provisions of the Constitution as is his status “at birth.” If one is not “born” a natural born citizen, he can never be a natural born citizen.