Not bad.
I know, right?
The Drudge headline had everyone in a fit.
lol
basically the NY Slimes is saying that Sarah “covered up” her baby...literally and figuratively. It’s subtle slam...about how she’s “using” her baby, and putting politics first.
Let them keep it up... When Trig is 12 years old, Sarah will be giving her last State of the Union Speech, while BHO will be back to “community organizing”
But why? She has a child that most likely her and her husband will outlive. That fact is pain enough. These miserable creatures at the Times should spend all this energy on investigating Obama.
I’m stunned! This is pretty straight-forward reporting.
-Toonces
THE BAD:
Okay, first page of article was full of snarky comments. Painted her out as somewhat sneaky and secretive as she didn’t even inform her own family and friends about her pregnancy. Further tried to depict the baby as some sort of sophisticated plan to enhance her public image. Further reinforced this idea by quoting daughter as only realizing Trig had Downs syndrome after he was born. Somehow, Sarah’s working out having the baby at 44 and as a governor was depicted slightly negative. Reporters couldn’t resist being subversive in a subtle way.
THE GOOD:
Second page of article was mostly positive. Leftist talking points on the baby and family have been nuked by NYT. Confirms she had the baby (not daughter), confirms she didn’t do anything to harm baby by traveling (sorry Alan Colmes, your hit piece is dead), confirms she handled entire situation very well as far as having the baby at 44 and as a governor of a state.
In summary, someone up high is realizing the damage they have done to Obama by the mean spirited hit pieces they have run on Sarah’s family, and they are trying to shut the nutroots up to save him from further fallout.
Oh, and Keith Olbermann looked very down and out tonight on the Sunday night football show. Why do they keep him on that show, he adds no value?