Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush vetoes stem cell bill
MSNBC ^ | 06/20/2007 | AP

Posted on 06/20/2007 11:31:34 AM PDT by Smogger

WASHINGTON - Pushing back against the Democratic-led Congress, President Bush vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have eased restraints on federally funded embryonic stem cell research.

Democrats, who had made the stem cell legislation a top priority when they took control of the House and Senate in January, were quick to denounce the president's decision.

"This is just one example of how the president puts ideology before science, politics before the needs of our families, just one more example of how out of touch with reality he and his party have become," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., told the Take Back America conference of liberal activists Wednesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evenabrokenclock; stemcells; vetobush43
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: Smogger
Somebody must have told him that illegal immigrants have stem cells.

Immigration aside, an salute to the president for the veto.

21 posted on 06/20/2007 11:47:54 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Right Cal Gal

“just one more example of how out of touch with reality he and his party have become,” Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.”

And this quote is from a member of congress that has a disapproval rating of 71%

What this says is that the American people don’t want to use federal tax dollars for stem cell research.

What Hillary seems to be saying is that the American people are out of step with Congress because we don’t agree with her/them.

But wait — congress is supposed to be in touch with the American people. Congress is totally disconnected from those of us who are pro-life. And 71% of us disapprove with what congress is doing and how they are doing it.

I, for one, can’t wait until election day!


23 posted on 06/20/2007 11:50:03 AM PDT by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Bush vetoes stem cell bill

Praising God for this Wonderful News!

24 posted on 06/20/2007 11:51:00 AM PDT by Kitty Mittens (To God Be All Excellent Praise!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Great job, Mr. President. And good presentation, today.

Good to see you being the man we elected, for awhile.

25 posted on 06/20/2007 11:52:25 AM PDT by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UltraDude

oh yes. It’s much better to cast them into the trash bin where they belong.

</sarcasm>


26 posted on 06/20/2007 11:52:32 AM PDT by publana (Build the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Most of the stem cells they are talking about come from in vitro fertilization - a more consistent policy would be to ban in vitro fertilization.

Actually the more consistent policy would be to ban use of federal funds to pay for in vitro fertilization. There is nothing to prevent of prohibit private research funds from doing stem cell research on the cells you are talking about. Of course privately funded research sources typically expect results and thus would be more likely to focus on the areas where research has actually demonstrated some promising results.

27 posted on 06/20/2007 11:53:29 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Too bad he’s just vetoing it cuz it’s a ‘stem cell’ bill. Why not veto every one of these ‘research bills’? Politics and science mixing is no better than politics and anything else mixing..


28 posted on 06/20/2007 11:53:43 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Naaaaa......not for this one. :)

Thank you, Mr. President.


29 posted on 06/20/2007 11:54:28 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (See HiJinx's tag line....then DO it!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

So AP reports the fact of the veto and immediately quotes Democrats attacking it—without first quoting anything the President said to explain his action.


30 posted on 06/20/2007 11:55:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

>>Actually the more consistent policy would be to ban use of federal funds to pay for in vitro fertilization. There is nothing to prevent of prohibit private research funds from doing stem cell research on the cells you are talking about. Of course privately funded research sources typically expect results and thus would be more likely to focus on the areas where research has actually demonstrated some promising results.<<

You’re right. I didn’t draw the distinction in funding.


31 posted on 06/20/2007 11:56:47 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y

One of our top stem cell scientists. The Pres mentioned that this action can have no effect on research funding other than Federal.

32 posted on 06/20/2007 11:57:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Most of the stem cells they are talking about come from in vitro fertilization - a more consistent policy would be to ban in vitro fertilization.

Thereby driving millions of infertile couples into the ranks of the Democratic Party? Brilliant recipe for political suicide.

33 posted on 06/20/2007 11:58:03 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: publana

He throws his base a bone.


34 posted on 06/20/2007 11:58:28 AM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
I gotta run here come the illegal-immigrant-bush-is-the-devil zealots. ;-)

Now now. We don't think he's "the devil." Posessed by the devil lately, perhaps.

35 posted on 06/20/2007 11:59:25 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Big Media will not use the term "embryonic" stem cell in any other reporting.

They used this tactic this morning on ABC Good Morning America program to confuse the sheeple and not differenciate between embryonic and other stem cells.

36 posted on 06/20/2007 12:01:28 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

>>Thereby driving millions of infertile couples into the ranks of the Democratic Party? Brilliant recipe for political suicide.<<

Are we talking politics or principles?


37 posted on 06/20/2007 12:02:25 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

So much for Micheal J Fox’s appeal for Claire MCCaskill


38 posted on 06/20/2007 12:05:00 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Exactly. I still want that fence first but good job, Mr. President.


39 posted on 06/20/2007 12:06:37 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Kinda like their use of “a certain type of late term medical precedure” instead of “Partial Birth Abortion”


40 posted on 06/20/2007 12:08:03 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson