Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prostitutes and Politics Why is it still illegal to pay for sex?
Reason Online ^ | May 7, 2007 | Cathy Young

Posted on 05/09/2007 6:51:49 AM PDT by Lusis

The resignation of Randall Tobias, the chief of the Bush administration's foreign aid programs, for "personal reasons" following the revelation that he had engaged the services of two escort-service workers has provided rich grist for amusement on the punditry circuit. There was indeed plenty of material for humor in the situation, from Tobias's strong stand in favor of abstinence teaching in AIDS prevention programs to his "I didn't inhale"-style assertion that he never had sex with the women. But the predictable laughs have obscured a much larger issue than hypocrisy in the ranks of social conservatives. The reason Tobias's call-girl adventures became public is that the owner of the Washington, DC-based service, Pamela Martin, is facing prosecution and has turned her records over to news organizations to help pay for her legal defense.

Even those who feel a certain schadenfreude at Tobias's downfall should be asking the question: should there have been a criminal case in the first place?

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amoral; bowtothepeepee; butgodsaysnoooooo; consentingadults; ilovebiggubmint; inprivate; itsjustsex; lawrencevtexas; libertines; othersdonotpay; prostitution; repentsinnerz; somehavetopay; thepeepeeandstate; thepeepeeasgod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-423 next last
To: FormerLib
But the libertarians are wrong when they suggest that there wouldn't be an increase in crimes committed by drug-intoxicated and/or hallucinating individuals.

That remains to be seen. I tend to agree with you in that I *think* there would be, at least initially, but I have no way to prove that.

The balance govt should strike when weighing whether a law is outside the govt's purview (which is securing individual rights) and establishing principle in law is a very hard one to achieve.
61 posted on 05/09/2007 7:44:59 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lusis
The liberal agenda is alive and well. Prostitution is morally wrong and should be illegal.
62 posted on 05/09/2007 7:46:08 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Besides, I DO believe in legislating morality. You know, little things like murder, rape, theft, pedophilia, bestiality, etc

Except maybe for the bestiality part, all of these crimes are far less morality based and far more victim based. One person suffering harm by the direct and unapproved actions of another person.

63 posted on 05/09/2007 7:49:10 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Discrimination against Muslims is acceptable if we are to survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Top issues for Libertarians:

1) Surrendering to al-Quaeda

Fighting a real war on terrorism instead of nation-building

2) Opening our national borders to everyone.

Borders are already open under Bush and the GOP

3) Legalizing drugs

Drugs are still illegal & people are abusing them

4) Legalizing prostitution

None of your business what private citizens do with their lives

64 posted on 05/09/2007 7:49:43 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: psychoknk
One has to view the government as an institution that secures certain rights at the expense of other rights. In an anarchy, you can go around, killing/stealing/raping/burning, etc. You have infinite "rights:" the right to life, the right to kill, the right to your possessions, the right to steal, etc. Many of these "rights" are incompatible with each other, and hence they are tenuous; my right to life would be in conflict with someone else's right to kill. A government is there to secures everyone's right to life at the expense of everyone's "right" to kill, in order to maintain stability.

I have to somewhat disagree with this, as the Founders never insinuated there was ever a 'right to kill' like they did a person's 'right to live'. Our rights are not granted by the Constitution; they exist independent of any human institution, the Constitution merely lists *some* of them. I would suggest that a 'right to kill' doesn't exist, where we define kill as murder. Obviously, a person also has the right to use deadly force to defend themselves, but that's a different matter. In this framework, Anarchy exists when there is no coherent force tasked with preventing the infringement of individual rights; it does not constitute a state in which there is suddenly this 'right to kill, rape, pillage, and burn'. You are, however, absolutely correct in that those things would happen in a state of Anarchy. This is why the Declaration of Independence states that to secure our rights, governments are instituted among men by consent of the governed. This is why government exists, period: to secure individual rights from infringement.
65 posted on 05/09/2007 7:50:16 AM PDT by JamesP81 (Isaiah 10:1 - "Woe to those who enact evil statutes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
The men who wrote that Constitution would never allow legalized prostitution, but the Libertarians don’t care about that truth or the outcome of such an action, preferring the purity of their philosophy over the death and destruction it surely brings.

Typical wide stroke of the brush. Libertarians are no more in favor of legalizing prostitution than Christian conservatives are.

66 posted on 05/09/2007 7:51:09 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
I see you use the big L when not taking Libertarians seriously. Most who consider themselves libertarians dont necessarily follow that party’s line.

They do that all the time. Notice that Libertarians weren't even the topic of the article. The hyper-moralists just have to get their cheap shots in.

67 posted on 05/09/2007 7:52:29 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

t is illegal to pay for sex because our very existence as a nation relies on the Judeo-Christian values that formed us. Using the letter of the Constitution to legalize destructive, immoral activities is suicide and worthy of the Clintons, Reids and Pelosis of this world. The men who wrote that Constitution would never allow legalized prostitution,

Care to comment on the state of Nevada?

68 posted on 05/09/2007 7:53:50 AM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
"Only someone ignorant of history could go down this road this way."

I don't believe the founding fathers addressed slavery in the Constitution (it was not abolished by the Constitution) and I do believe that a few of them were slave owners themselves.

No sir I am not ignorant of history.
69 posted on 05/09/2007 7:54:30 AM PDT by The Louiswu (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
Oh, and how do you explain Billy Priapus Clinton?

The bill (no pun intended) just hasn't come due, in full. Partial payment credit must, in fairness, be given for marriage to her thighness...

70 posted on 05/09/2007 7:55:46 AM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lusis

The author states: “It’s hard to see who benefited from the fact that the authorities in Maryland spent a lot of taxpayer money to investigate and prosecute a woman for discreet and private sexual encounters with men”

No it isn’t if the author had done some research. Since I live in MD, I heard a lot about this case. The people who benefitted were her neighbors, whose complaints sparked the investigation. She was operating in a family-oriented community with men coming and going at all hours. I have no particular complaint about legalizing prostitution, but it should be regulated in such a way that it doesn’t create a public nuisance; call it a zoning matter if you like, but I dont think families trying to raise children should have to be exposed to it.


71 posted on 05/09/2007 7:56:58 AM PDT by NoBullZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
It is illegal to pay for sex because our very existence as a nation relies on the Judeo-Christian values that formed us. Using the letter of the Constitution to legalize destructive, immoral activities is suicide and worthy of the Clintons, Reids and Pelosis of this world. The men who wrote that Constitution would never allow legalized prostitution, but the Libertarians don’t care about that truth or the outcome of such an action, preferring the purity of their philosophy over the death and destruction it surely brings.

Compared to the sleaze going on between politicians, lobbyists, fundraisers, staffers, professional bureaucrats, etc., in Washington, DC., regular ol' garden-variety prostitution is as pure as the driven snow.

72 posted on 05/09/2007 7:57:39 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
And that is the main reason why prostitution was made illegal in the country during the late 19th Century, women were being forced into prostitution against their will. Most of the place in Europe that permit prostitution have numerous laws in place to ensure that this doesn’t happen, yet the reports of women being trafficked as sex slaves in those same countries are commonly reported here on Free Republic.

There just never are easy answers to questions such as this.

73 posted on 05/09/2007 7:58:57 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
The extremely HIGH rate of HIV/AIDS in Africa is largely due to prostitutes... Same is true in SE Asia.

And guess what, prostitution is illegal there too (you haven't specified any countries, but so far, I'! Wow, those laws sure work well, don't they?

Besides, I'm not sure where you are getting your HIV/AIDS data from. I have heard of three things causing the massive spread of HIV in Africa:

Besides, I DO believe in legislating morality. You know, little things like murder, rape, theft, pedophilia, bestiality, etc... ALL laws legislate morality to some degree.

I've already replied to this argument.

74 posted on 05/09/2007 8:00:12 AM PDT by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: psychoknk

I agree that government is a “necessary evil”. It is required to restrain the impulses of a fallen/sinful humanity. Government is an institution of God, given out of his kindness to man, and to preserve something of his crowning achievement in creation:

Genesis 9:6  Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

There is no “right to kill”, it is wrong to kill. This has always been. It is just to punish the guilty. That is why capital punishment is just...and abortion is murder.

Our founders appealed to “self evident truth”. Man inherently knows the difference between right and wrong (in an imperfect, fallible way, but he does have a conscience).

You wrote: “one must pick whose morality to legislate”.

The founders did just that. They chose Moses, and the Bible.

The moral code (law) given in the Ten Commandments were written by the finger of God. The Old Testament laws are largely the basis of our criminal and civil codes to this day.

If one follows the New Testament standard 1) to love God, and 2) to love their neighbor as theirself, then the Ten Commandments are no longer needed as they are contained in the two.

The reason we have a government with the power of justice and defense is to protect us from fallen/sinful humanity within our borders, or without (all enemies foreign and domestic).

And of course, if the Muslims take over, Christian morality won’t be legislated, as Islam has always been a religion of the sword, its devoted followers forcefully subjugating all who oppose it.

But that is no reason to abandon our system of self-government. Rather we must realize the Judeo-Christian foundation of our system and repair it. History and the present governments around the world are graphic examples of the alternative(s).


75 posted on 05/09/2007 8:00:31 AM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

If you don’t think someone suffers harm in “victimless” crimes, you’re either deluded or sociopathic. I’ve seen it.

And, as others pointed out, the disease vector issue isn’t just about HIV/AIDS.


76 posted on 05/09/2007 8:00:56 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

You are just arguing semantics. How would you define a right? Is there some clear test that I can apply that would say if something is or isn’t a right?


77 posted on 05/09/2007 8:02:05 AM PDT by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Lusis

Why should it be a criminal case? Because this behavior - by both parties concerned here - rends the fabric of society. Commandments dealing with this are not in the Bible on a whim of God or by chance.


78 posted on 05/09/2007 8:02:26 AM PDT by twonie (RUDY FOR PRESIDENT '08. THERE - A COMMITMENT OUT LOUD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
Man has always paid for sex. One way or another.

Why do so many people forget this?

Marriage, girlfriends or prostitution .... one way or the other, you're gonna pay.

79 posted on 05/09/2007 8:02:53 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee
It isn’t “victimless”, there is trafficking in sex slaves.

In all seriousness, many illegals come here via coyotes who will ruin the illegal's family if the illegal doesn't pay down the coyote's fee quickly. This applies to busboys and dishwashers as well.

80 posted on 05/09/2007 8:04:41 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-423 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson