Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT Reporting Friday, Sources Say: U.S. Posting of Iraq Nuke Docs on Web Could Have Helped Iran
Drudge Report ^ | November 2, 2006

Posted on 11/02/2006 7:14:31 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

Federal government set up Web site -- Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal -- to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war; detailed accounts of Iraq's secret nuclear research; a 'basic guide to building an atom bomb'... Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency fear the information could help Iran develop nuclear arms... contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that the nuclear experts say go beyond what is available elsewhere on the Internet and in other public forums...

Website now shut... Developing...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; nuclearprogram; nytimes; saddam; wmdprogram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last
To: Mo1

I think Santorum was very instrumental in getting these documents released...with Hoekstra...

I HOPE that Santorum USES this article for the next 4 days!!


161 posted on 11/02/2006 8:42:44 PM PST by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
What's so wrong about Iran having a nuclear program? I thought that it was pure arrogance and hegemony on our part to decide which nations should have nukes and which should not. The president of Iran visited the USA and was treated like a rock star by the New York Times.

Good points.

162 posted on 11/02/2006 8:44:46 PM PST by syriacus (MJ Fox tells the US, "Show me you love ME, baby, by giving up YOUR life for ME.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: darkmatter

Yeah that argument does make sense, I just hope it doesn't get drowned out.


163 posted on 11/02/2006 8:44:49 PM PST by scsscs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: scsscs

If they were referring to right after the Gulf war cease fire was signed, why would Hussein have additional documents up until 2002? Unless of course, his program never ended.


164 posted on 11/02/2006 8:45:31 PM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

BTTT, BOOKMARKING, and LET'S ROLL!


165 posted on 11/02/2006 8:46:51 PM PST by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jess35

I agree that they shouldn't have had them in 2002. I was just trying to figure out what the NYT was trying to say in that paragraph. It's pretty poorly written.


166 posted on 11/02/2006 8:51:32 PM PST by scsscs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: CptRepublican
Here is the rebuttal to the NY Slimes
Clinton Scheme Gave Iran Nuke Blueprints

Oh...my...gosh.

167 posted on 11/02/2006 8:53:25 PM PST by syriacus (MJ Fox tells the US, "Show me you love ME, baby, by giving up YOUR life for ME.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?ei=5094&en=1511d6b3da302d4f&hp=&ex=1162530000&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print

But in recent weeks, the site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves:

Well that shoots down the argument that Iran got their nuke information from these documents

And this part proves that someone over at the UN and been reading these documents and have said nothing about it

Last night, the government shut down the Web site after The New York Times asked about complaints from weapons experts and arms-control officials. A spokesman for the director of national intelligence said access to the site had been suspended “pending a review to ensure its content is appropriate for public viewing.”

168 posted on 11/02/2006 8:54:20 PM PST by Mo1 (Senator Kerry's response to the military ~ Let me make this is crystal clear, I apologize to no one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

My first chance to thank you from all my heart for what you have been doing. It's been invaluable, and will be even more so in 2008!

One reason for posting these documents was that DoD didn't have enough translators to handle all the documents, so they couldn't know what was in most of these documents. Even if they knew and released some of them (like NYT and Dems do) they'd be accused of "selectively leaking" favorable news (like NYT and Dems do) and "manipulating" classified info for political gain (like NYT and Dems do). This article is much more a thinly veiled attack on Republican Congressmen just before elections, as inane as it is, more so than attack on Bush. NYT is trying to blame them for making very important nuclear "secrets" available to Iran. All NYT cares about is to get the "great unwashed" confused enough and angry enough to go the polls and vote against Republicans instead of sitting out.

I questioned if NYT article writers would mention your translations and FR, which apparently they couldn't do lest their "facts" become totally incongruent. As it is, it becomes just another "botched joke".

I hope some other FReepers coordinated and downloaded even more documents, so the great work can continue uninterrupted, and possibly somewhat automated (I am not an expert on Arabic, but maybe there can be some keyword or pattern search of documents in digital format? PDFs? to weed out "relevant" documents)


169 posted on 11/02/2006 9:52:30 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I remember a grad student in the 80's who posted a research paper that in fact laid out how to build a A Bomb. He got all his info from public sources, so no big deal here. What is a big deal is getting the equipment that is needed to build a bomb from scratch. We can thank our Euro friends for what Iran has now. All the NYT is really doing in proving the president was right about Iraq ans WMD's.
170 posted on 11/02/2006 10:08:02 PM PST by Bombard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

Ok. The documents show that Hussein was about a year away from having a nuke before we went in. But we all know how the msm, dems, libs will spin this. "Bush put out information on how to build nukes." Hate to say it, but this will probably be the final nail in the Bush presidency.


171 posted on 11/03/2006 4:19:51 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

If I get this right, the documents show how far along Iraq`s nuke program was in 1991. If thats true, putting info on the internet on how to build a nuke (where anyone or any country could see it) is incredibly stupid. I`ve been with Bush through thick and thin, but what the hell was he thinking when he allowed this?


172 posted on 11/03/2006 5:35:09 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

there may have been some signicant errors planted in there just to misguide someone, though it's hard to believe after Pakistan's Khan's Nukes R US project that there is anyone left in the world without the wherewithal to put a nuke together.

Mum's the word, chum.


173 posted on 11/03/2006 1:14:54 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson